What is the "right" inventory management approach for a purchased item?

Cynthia Wallin, M. Johnny Rungtusanatham, Elliot Rabinovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - How should a firm decide which of four choices - i.e. inventory speculation, inventory postponement, inventory consignment, and reverse inventory consignment - is most appropriate to adopt for a given purchased item in a particular context? This paper seeks to identify and explain the critical factors that drive this decision. Design/methodology/approach - By conducting a review of relevant literature and deriving anecdotal observations from four case studies. Findings - This decision is influenced by three factors - customer demand or usage requirements, nature of the supply line and bargaining power of a firm relative to the supplier. Research limitations/implications - From the perspective of science, the conduct of both empirical research to augment the reported anecdotal evidence and conceptual research along a number of directions (e.g. to juxtapose the research findings in existing theories, to examine variations of the four "pure" inventory management approaches, or to consider the vantage point of the supplying firm rather than that of the buying firm) is encouraged. Practical implications - As for the perspective of practice, the critical factors serve as the basis for the articulation of a decision framework - one that should help firms not only pin-point the most relevant issues concerning a particular purchased item but also to avoid the costly mistake of selecting a less-than-ideal inventory management approach. Originality/value - These critical factors, along with the proposed decision framework, extend prior research which has focused only on choosing between the inventory speculation approach and the inventory postponement approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-68
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Inventory management
Critical factors
Speculation
Consignment
Postponement
Factors
Empirical research
Bargaining power
Articulation
Design methodology
Suppliers

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Inventory management
  • Purchasing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Decision Sciences(all)

Cite this

What is the "right" inventory management approach for a purchased item? / Wallin, Cynthia; Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny; Rabinovich, Elliot.

In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006, p. 50-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7280e14b47e489b9bb8a99f6f7f3a79,
title = "What is the {"}right{"} inventory management approach for a purchased item?",
abstract = "Purpose - How should a firm decide which of four choices - i.e. inventory speculation, inventory postponement, inventory consignment, and reverse inventory consignment - is most appropriate to adopt for a given purchased item in a particular context? This paper seeks to identify and explain the critical factors that drive this decision. Design/methodology/approach - By conducting a review of relevant literature and deriving anecdotal observations from four case studies. Findings - This decision is influenced by three factors - customer demand or usage requirements, nature of the supply line and bargaining power of a firm relative to the supplier. Research limitations/implications - From the perspective of science, the conduct of both empirical research to augment the reported anecdotal evidence and conceptual research along a number of directions (e.g. to juxtapose the research findings in existing theories, to examine variations of the four {"}pure{"} inventory management approaches, or to consider the vantage point of the supplying firm rather than that of the buying firm) is encouraged. Practical implications - As for the perspective of practice, the critical factors serve as the basis for the articulation of a decision framework - one that should help firms not only pin-point the most relevant issues concerning a particular purchased item but also to avoid the costly mistake of selecting a less-than-ideal inventory management approach. Originality/value - These critical factors, along with the proposed decision framework, extend prior research which has focused only on choosing between the inventory speculation approach and the inventory postponement approach.",
keywords = "Decision making, Inventory management, Purchasing",
author = "Cynthia Wallin and Rungtusanatham, {M. Johnny} and Elliot Rabinovich",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1108/01443570610637012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "50--68",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the "right" inventory management approach for a purchased item?

AU - Wallin, Cynthia

AU - Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny

AU - Rabinovich, Elliot

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose - How should a firm decide which of four choices - i.e. inventory speculation, inventory postponement, inventory consignment, and reverse inventory consignment - is most appropriate to adopt for a given purchased item in a particular context? This paper seeks to identify and explain the critical factors that drive this decision. Design/methodology/approach - By conducting a review of relevant literature and deriving anecdotal observations from four case studies. Findings - This decision is influenced by three factors - customer demand or usage requirements, nature of the supply line and bargaining power of a firm relative to the supplier. Research limitations/implications - From the perspective of science, the conduct of both empirical research to augment the reported anecdotal evidence and conceptual research along a number of directions (e.g. to juxtapose the research findings in existing theories, to examine variations of the four "pure" inventory management approaches, or to consider the vantage point of the supplying firm rather than that of the buying firm) is encouraged. Practical implications - As for the perspective of practice, the critical factors serve as the basis for the articulation of a decision framework - one that should help firms not only pin-point the most relevant issues concerning a particular purchased item but also to avoid the costly mistake of selecting a less-than-ideal inventory management approach. Originality/value - These critical factors, along with the proposed decision framework, extend prior research which has focused only on choosing between the inventory speculation approach and the inventory postponement approach.

AB - Purpose - How should a firm decide which of four choices - i.e. inventory speculation, inventory postponement, inventory consignment, and reverse inventory consignment - is most appropriate to adopt for a given purchased item in a particular context? This paper seeks to identify and explain the critical factors that drive this decision. Design/methodology/approach - By conducting a review of relevant literature and deriving anecdotal observations from four case studies. Findings - This decision is influenced by three factors - customer demand or usage requirements, nature of the supply line and bargaining power of a firm relative to the supplier. Research limitations/implications - From the perspective of science, the conduct of both empirical research to augment the reported anecdotal evidence and conceptual research along a number of directions (e.g. to juxtapose the research findings in existing theories, to examine variations of the four "pure" inventory management approaches, or to consider the vantage point of the supplying firm rather than that of the buying firm) is encouraged. Practical implications - As for the perspective of practice, the critical factors serve as the basis for the articulation of a decision framework - one that should help firms not only pin-point the most relevant issues concerning a particular purchased item but also to avoid the costly mistake of selecting a less-than-ideal inventory management approach. Originality/value - These critical factors, along with the proposed decision framework, extend prior research which has focused only on choosing between the inventory speculation approach and the inventory postponement approach.

KW - Decision making

KW - Inventory management

KW - Purchasing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31644442137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31644442137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/01443570610637012

DO - 10.1108/01443570610637012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:31644442137

VL - 26

SP - 50

EP - 68

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 1

ER -