What Influences Consumer Evaluation of Genetically Modified Foods?

Nguyen Pham, Naomi Mandel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) foods have attracted a great deal of controversy. While some consumers and organizations regard GM foods as safe, many other consumers and organizations remain concerned about their potential health risks. The results of three studies suggest that consumers respond differently to persuasive messages regarding GM foods on the basis of their preexisting attitudes. Weak anti-GM consumers tend to comply with a variety of pro-GM messages. In contrast, strong anti-GM consumers exhibit message-opposing behavior. Moreover, they respond just as negatively to a safety message (claiming that GM foods are safe) as to a risk message (claiming that GM foods are unsafe). The mechanism underlying these effects is consumers’ perceived health risk. A benefit message claiming that GM foods are beneficial (e.g., more nutritious than their conventional counterparts) is a better alternative for strong anti-GM consumers. Finally, the results suggest that persuasive messages do not significantly change pro-GM consumers’ evaluations of these foods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-279
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Public Policy and Marketing
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Consumer evaluation
Genetically modified food
Genetically modified
Health risk
Food
Safety
Perceived health

Keywords

  • genetically modified foods
  • health messages
  • memory accessibility
  • risk perceptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

What Influences Consumer Evaluation of Genetically Modified Foods? / Pham, Nguyen; Mandel, Naomi.

In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 263-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c44e483375414c048f5403f6ea6cddb0,
title = "What Influences Consumer Evaluation of Genetically Modified Foods?",
abstract = "Genetically modified (GM) foods have attracted a great deal of controversy. While some consumers and organizations regard GM foods as safe, many other consumers and organizations remain concerned about their potential health risks. The results of three studies suggest that consumers respond differently to persuasive messages regarding GM foods on the basis of their preexisting attitudes. Weak anti-GM consumers tend to comply with a variety of pro-GM messages. In contrast, strong anti-GM consumers exhibit message-opposing behavior. Moreover, they respond just as negatively to a safety message (claiming that GM foods are safe) as to a risk message (claiming that GM foods are unsafe). The mechanism underlying these effects is consumers’ perceived health risk. A benefit message claiming that GM foods are beneficial (e.g., more nutritious than their conventional counterparts) is a better alternative for strong anti-GM consumers. Finally, the results suggest that persuasive messages do not significantly change pro-GM consumers’ evaluations of these foods.",
keywords = "genetically modified foods, health messages, memory accessibility, risk perceptions",
author = "Nguyen Pham and Naomi Mandel",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0743915618818168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "263--279",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy and Marketing",
issn = "0743-9156",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Influences Consumer Evaluation of Genetically Modified Foods?

AU - Pham, Nguyen

AU - Mandel, Naomi

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Genetically modified (GM) foods have attracted a great deal of controversy. While some consumers and organizations regard GM foods as safe, many other consumers and organizations remain concerned about their potential health risks. The results of three studies suggest that consumers respond differently to persuasive messages regarding GM foods on the basis of their preexisting attitudes. Weak anti-GM consumers tend to comply with a variety of pro-GM messages. In contrast, strong anti-GM consumers exhibit message-opposing behavior. Moreover, they respond just as negatively to a safety message (claiming that GM foods are safe) as to a risk message (claiming that GM foods are unsafe). The mechanism underlying these effects is consumers’ perceived health risk. A benefit message claiming that GM foods are beneficial (e.g., more nutritious than their conventional counterparts) is a better alternative for strong anti-GM consumers. Finally, the results suggest that persuasive messages do not significantly change pro-GM consumers’ evaluations of these foods.

AB - Genetically modified (GM) foods have attracted a great deal of controversy. While some consumers and organizations regard GM foods as safe, many other consumers and organizations remain concerned about their potential health risks. The results of three studies suggest that consumers respond differently to persuasive messages regarding GM foods on the basis of their preexisting attitudes. Weak anti-GM consumers tend to comply with a variety of pro-GM messages. In contrast, strong anti-GM consumers exhibit message-opposing behavior. Moreover, they respond just as negatively to a safety message (claiming that GM foods are safe) as to a risk message (claiming that GM foods are unsafe). The mechanism underlying these effects is consumers’ perceived health risk. A benefit message claiming that GM foods are beneficial (e.g., more nutritious than their conventional counterparts) is a better alternative for strong anti-GM consumers. Finally, the results suggest that persuasive messages do not significantly change pro-GM consumers’ evaluations of these foods.

KW - genetically modified foods

KW - health messages

KW - memory accessibility

KW - risk perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070350020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070350020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0743915618818168

DO - 10.1177/0743915618818168

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070350020

VL - 38

SP - 263

EP - 279

JO - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

JF - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

SN - 0743-9156

IS - 2

ER -