Abstract
Theory and research examining length of acquaintance and consensus among personality judgments have predominantly examined each dimension of personality separately. In L. J. Cronbach's (1955) terminology, this trait-centered approach combines consensus on elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy in personality judgments. The current article extends D. A. Kenny's (1991, 1994) weighted average model (WAM) - a theoretical model of the factors that influence agreement among personality judgments - to separate out two of Cronbach's components of consensus: stereotype accuracy and differential accuracy. Consistent with the predictions based on the WAM, as length of acquaintance increased, self-other agreement and consensus differential accuracy increased, stereotype accuracy decreased, and trait-level or raw profile correlations generally remained unchanged. Discussion focuses on the conditions under which a relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement among personality evaluations emerges and how impressions change over time.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 119-135 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
Volume | 92 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2007 |
Keywords
- Accuracy
- Acquaintance
- Consensus
- Personality
- Stereotype accuracy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science