What counts as response and intervention in RTI? a sociocultural analysis

Alfredo J. Artiles, Elizabeth B. Kozleski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 13 Citations

Abstract

Response to Intervention (RTI) is being used in districts and states around the United States (U.S.) as a means to enhance learning opportunities and address the needs of struggling learners. Increasing attention to RTI in the research community and the recent creation of a large national technical assistance center reflect its growing visibility. Because equity issues for ethnic and linguistically diverse students are purportedly addressed in RTI models, we conduct a sociocultural analysis of its building blocks, namely the definitions and assumptions embedded in the notions of «response» and «intervention». We used interdisciplinary theoretical and empirical insights about the cultural nature of learning and development to inform our analysis. We discuss how the assumptions of RTI might unintentionally create blind spots for researchers and practitioners about how to design, conduct, and assess learning environments, particularly for diverse students. We conclude with reflections about future directions in this research area.

Translated title of the contributionWhat counts as response and intervention in RTI? a sociocultural analysis :
LanguageSpanish
Pages949-954
Number of pages6
JournalPsicothema
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Learning
Students
Optic Disk
Research
Research Personnel
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

¿Qué se considera como Respuesta e Intervención en RTI? Una perspectiva sociocultural. / Artiles, Alfredo J.; Kozleski, Elizabeth B.

In: Psicothema, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2010, p. 949-954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{daaad15da43447d1be3f68bd39a0a7c6,
title = "¿Qu{\'e} se considera como Respuesta e Intervenci{\'o}n en RTI? Una perspectiva sociocultural",
abstract = "Response to Intervention (RTI) is being used in districts and states around the United States (U.S.) as a means to enhance learning opportunities and address the needs of struggling learners. Increasing attention to RTI in the research community and the recent creation of a large national technical assistance center reflect its growing visibility. Because equity issues for ethnic and linguistically diverse students are purportedly addressed in RTI models, we conduct a sociocultural analysis of its building blocks, namely the definitions and assumptions embedded in the notions of «response» and «intervention». We used interdisciplinary theoretical and empirical insights about the cultural nature of learning and development to inform our analysis. We discuss how the assumptions of RTI might unintentionally create blind spots for researchers and practitioners about how to design, conduct, and assess learning environments, particularly for diverse students. We conclude with reflections about future directions in this research area.",
author = "Artiles, {Alfredo J.} and Kozleski, {Elizabeth B.}",
year = "2010",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "22",
pages = "949--954",
journal = "Psicothema",
issn = "0214-9915",
publisher = "Colegio Oficial de Psicologos Asturias",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ¿Qué se considera como Respuesta e Intervención en RTI? Una perspectiva sociocultural

AU - Artiles,Alfredo J.

AU - Kozleski,Elizabeth B.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Response to Intervention (RTI) is being used in districts and states around the United States (U.S.) as a means to enhance learning opportunities and address the needs of struggling learners. Increasing attention to RTI in the research community and the recent creation of a large national technical assistance center reflect its growing visibility. Because equity issues for ethnic and linguistically diverse students are purportedly addressed in RTI models, we conduct a sociocultural analysis of its building blocks, namely the definitions and assumptions embedded in the notions of «response» and «intervention». We used interdisciplinary theoretical and empirical insights about the cultural nature of learning and development to inform our analysis. We discuss how the assumptions of RTI might unintentionally create blind spots for researchers and practitioners about how to design, conduct, and assess learning environments, particularly for diverse students. We conclude with reflections about future directions in this research area.

AB - Response to Intervention (RTI) is being used in districts and states around the United States (U.S.) as a means to enhance learning opportunities and address the needs of struggling learners. Increasing attention to RTI in the research community and the recent creation of a large national technical assistance center reflect its growing visibility. Because equity issues for ethnic and linguistically diverse students are purportedly addressed in RTI models, we conduct a sociocultural analysis of its building blocks, namely the definitions and assumptions embedded in the notions of «response» and «intervention». We used interdisciplinary theoretical and empirical insights about the cultural nature of learning and development to inform our analysis. We discuss how the assumptions of RTI might unintentionally create blind spots for researchers and practitioners about how to design, conduct, and assess learning environments, particularly for diverse students. We conclude with reflections about future directions in this research area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78549265123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78549265123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 949

EP - 954

JO - Psicothema

T2 - Psicothema

JF - Psicothema

SN - 0214-9915

IS - 4

ER -