Weekly Cycles in Daily Report Data

An Overlooked Issue

Yu Liu, Stephen West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Daily diaries and other everyday experience methods are increasingly used to study relationships between two time-varying variables X and Y. Although daily data potentially often have weekly cyclical patterns (e.g., stress may be higher on weekdays and lower on weekends), the majority of daily diary studies have ignored this possibility. In this study, we investigated the effect of ignoring existing weekly cycles. We reanalyzed an empirical dataset (stress and alcohol consumption) and performed Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the impact of omitting weekly cycles. In the empirical dataset, ignoring cycles led to the inference of a significant within-person X–Y relation whereas modeling cycles suggested that this relationship did not exist. Simulation results indicated that ignoring cycles that existed in both X and Y led to bias in the estimated within-person X–Y relationship. The amount and direction of bias depended on the magnitude of the cycles, magnitude of the true within-person X–Y relation, and synchronization of the cycles. We encourage researchers conducting daily diary studies to address potential weekly cycles in their data. We provide guidelines for detecting and modeling cycles to remove their influence and discuss challenges of causal inference in daily experience studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)560-579
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Alcohol Drinking
Research Personnel
Guidelines
Datasets
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Weekly Cycles in Daily Report Data : An Overlooked Issue. / Liu, Yu; West, Stephen.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 84, No. 5, 01.10.2016, p. 560-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97b78589c22a42aba584271685b04fab,
title = "Weekly Cycles in Daily Report Data: An Overlooked Issue",
abstract = "Daily diaries and other everyday experience methods are increasingly used to study relationships between two time-varying variables X and Y. Although daily data potentially often have weekly cyclical patterns (e.g., stress may be higher on weekdays and lower on weekends), the majority of daily diary studies have ignored this possibility. In this study, we investigated the effect of ignoring existing weekly cycles. We reanalyzed an empirical dataset (stress and alcohol consumption) and performed Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the impact of omitting weekly cycles. In the empirical dataset, ignoring cycles led to the inference of a significant within-person X–Y relation whereas modeling cycles suggested that this relationship did not exist. Simulation results indicated that ignoring cycles that existed in both X and Y led to bias in the estimated within-person X–Y relationship. The amount and direction of bias depended on the magnitude of the cycles, magnitude of the true within-person X–Y relation, and synchronization of the cycles. We encourage researchers conducting daily diary studies to address potential weekly cycles in their data. We provide guidelines for detecting and modeling cycles to remove their influence and discuss challenges of causal inference in daily experience studies.",
author = "Yu Liu and Stephen West",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jopy.12182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "560--579",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weekly Cycles in Daily Report Data

T2 - An Overlooked Issue

AU - Liu, Yu

AU - West, Stephen

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Daily diaries and other everyday experience methods are increasingly used to study relationships between two time-varying variables X and Y. Although daily data potentially often have weekly cyclical patterns (e.g., stress may be higher on weekdays and lower on weekends), the majority of daily diary studies have ignored this possibility. In this study, we investigated the effect of ignoring existing weekly cycles. We reanalyzed an empirical dataset (stress and alcohol consumption) and performed Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the impact of omitting weekly cycles. In the empirical dataset, ignoring cycles led to the inference of a significant within-person X–Y relation whereas modeling cycles suggested that this relationship did not exist. Simulation results indicated that ignoring cycles that existed in both X and Y led to bias in the estimated within-person X–Y relationship. The amount and direction of bias depended on the magnitude of the cycles, magnitude of the true within-person X–Y relation, and synchronization of the cycles. We encourage researchers conducting daily diary studies to address potential weekly cycles in their data. We provide guidelines for detecting and modeling cycles to remove their influence and discuss challenges of causal inference in daily experience studies.

AB - Daily diaries and other everyday experience methods are increasingly used to study relationships between two time-varying variables X and Y. Although daily data potentially often have weekly cyclical patterns (e.g., stress may be higher on weekdays and lower on weekends), the majority of daily diary studies have ignored this possibility. In this study, we investigated the effect of ignoring existing weekly cycles. We reanalyzed an empirical dataset (stress and alcohol consumption) and performed Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the impact of omitting weekly cycles. In the empirical dataset, ignoring cycles led to the inference of a significant within-person X–Y relation whereas modeling cycles suggested that this relationship did not exist. Simulation results indicated that ignoring cycles that existed in both X and Y led to bias in the estimated within-person X–Y relationship. The amount and direction of bias depended on the magnitude of the cycles, magnitude of the true within-person X–Y relation, and synchronization of the cycles. We encourage researchers conducting daily diary studies to address potential weekly cycles in their data. We provide guidelines for detecting and modeling cycles to remove their influence and discuss challenges of causal inference in daily experience studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985961239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985961239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopy.12182

DO - 10.1111/jopy.12182

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 560

EP - 579

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 5

ER -