Wearable monitors criterion validity for energy expenditure in sedentary and light activities

Florez Pregonero Alberto, Meckes Nathanael, Buman Mathew, Barbara Ainsworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Wearable monitors (WMs) are used to estimate the time spent in sedentary behaviors (SBs) and light-intensity physical activities (LPAs) and their associated energy cost; however, the accuracy of WMs in measuring behaviors on the lower end of the intensity spectrum is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of 3 WMs (ActiGraph GT3X+; activPAL, and SenseWear 2) in estimating the intensity of SB and LPA in adults as compared with the criterion measure of oxygen uptake (VO2) measured by indirect calorimetry. Methods Sixteen participants (age: 25.38 ± 8.58 years) wore the ActiGraph GT3X+, activPAL, and SenseWear 2 devices during 7 sedentary-to-light activities. VO2 (mL/kg/min) was estimated by means of a portable gas analyzer, Oxycon Mobile (Carefusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA). All data were transformed into metabolic equivalents and analyzed using mean percentage error, equivalence plots, Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistics, and sensitivity/specificity. Results Mean percentage error was lowest for the activPAL for SB (14.9%) and LPA (9.3%) compared with other WMs, which were >21.2%. None of the WMs fell within the equivalency range of ±10% of the criterion mean value. Bland-Altman plots revealed narrower levels of agreement with all WMs for SB than for LPA. Kappa statistics were low for all WMs, and sensitivity and specificity varied by WM type. Conclusion None of the WMs tested in this study were equivalent with the criterion measure (VO2) in estimating sedentary-to-light activities; however, the activPAL had greater overall accuracy in measuring SB and LPA than did the ActiGraph and SenseWear 2 monitors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-110
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sport and Health Science
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Energy Metabolism
Light
Metabolic Equivalent
Sensitivity and Specificity
Indirect Calorimetry
Gases
Oxygen
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Accelerometers
  • Accuracy
  • Low intensity
  • Metabolic estimations
  • Objective measurement
  • Sedentary behaviors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Wearable monitors criterion validity for energy expenditure in sedentary and light activities. / Alberto, Florez Pregonero; Nathanael, Meckes; Mathew, Buman; Ainsworth, Barbara.

In: Journal of Sport and Health Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 103-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alberto, Florez Pregonero ; Nathanael, Meckes ; Mathew, Buman ; Ainsworth, Barbara. / Wearable monitors criterion validity for energy expenditure in sedentary and light activities. In: Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 103-110.
@article{e71a08f6ca2540d3ab90517b8fb05207,
title = "Wearable monitors criterion validity for energy expenditure in sedentary and light activities",
abstract = "Background Wearable monitors (WMs) are used to estimate the time spent in sedentary behaviors (SBs) and light-intensity physical activities (LPAs) and their associated energy cost; however, the accuracy of WMs in measuring behaviors on the lower end of the intensity spectrum is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of 3 WMs (ActiGraph GT3X+; activPAL, and SenseWear 2) in estimating the intensity of SB and LPA in adults as compared with the criterion measure of oxygen uptake (VO2) measured by indirect calorimetry. Methods Sixteen participants (age: 25.38 ± 8.58 years) wore the ActiGraph GT3X+, activPAL, and SenseWear 2 devices during 7 sedentary-to-light activities. VO2 (mL/kg/min) was estimated by means of a portable gas analyzer, Oxycon Mobile (Carefusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA). All data were transformed into metabolic equivalents and analyzed using mean percentage error, equivalence plots, Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistics, and sensitivity/specificity. Results Mean percentage error was lowest for the activPAL for SB (14.9{\%}) and LPA (9.3{\%}) compared with other WMs, which were >21.2{\%}. None of the WMs fell within the equivalency range of ±10{\%} of the criterion mean value. Bland-Altman plots revealed narrower levels of agreement with all WMs for SB than for LPA. Kappa statistics were low for all WMs, and sensitivity and specificity varied by WM type. Conclusion None of the WMs tested in this study were equivalent with the criterion measure (VO2) in estimating sedentary-to-light activities; however, the activPAL had greater overall accuracy in measuring SB and LPA than did the ActiGraph and SenseWear 2 monitors.",
keywords = "Accelerometers, Accuracy, Low intensity, Metabolic estimations, Objective measurement, Sedentary behaviors",
author = "Alberto, {Florez Pregonero} and Meckes Nathanael and Buman Mathew and Barbara Ainsworth",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jshs.2016.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "103--110",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Health Science",
issn = "2095-2546",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wearable monitors criterion validity for energy expenditure in sedentary and light activities

AU - Alberto, Florez Pregonero

AU - Nathanael, Meckes

AU - Mathew, Buman

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Wearable monitors (WMs) are used to estimate the time spent in sedentary behaviors (SBs) and light-intensity physical activities (LPAs) and their associated energy cost; however, the accuracy of WMs in measuring behaviors on the lower end of the intensity spectrum is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of 3 WMs (ActiGraph GT3X+; activPAL, and SenseWear 2) in estimating the intensity of SB and LPA in adults as compared with the criterion measure of oxygen uptake (VO2) measured by indirect calorimetry. Methods Sixteen participants (age: 25.38 ± 8.58 years) wore the ActiGraph GT3X+, activPAL, and SenseWear 2 devices during 7 sedentary-to-light activities. VO2 (mL/kg/min) was estimated by means of a portable gas analyzer, Oxycon Mobile (Carefusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA). All data were transformed into metabolic equivalents and analyzed using mean percentage error, equivalence plots, Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistics, and sensitivity/specificity. Results Mean percentage error was lowest for the activPAL for SB (14.9%) and LPA (9.3%) compared with other WMs, which were >21.2%. None of the WMs fell within the equivalency range of ±10% of the criterion mean value. Bland-Altman plots revealed narrower levels of agreement with all WMs for SB than for LPA. Kappa statistics were low for all WMs, and sensitivity and specificity varied by WM type. Conclusion None of the WMs tested in this study were equivalent with the criterion measure (VO2) in estimating sedentary-to-light activities; however, the activPAL had greater overall accuracy in measuring SB and LPA than did the ActiGraph and SenseWear 2 monitors.

AB - Background Wearable monitors (WMs) are used to estimate the time spent in sedentary behaviors (SBs) and light-intensity physical activities (LPAs) and their associated energy cost; however, the accuracy of WMs in measuring behaviors on the lower end of the intensity spectrum is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of 3 WMs (ActiGraph GT3X+; activPAL, and SenseWear 2) in estimating the intensity of SB and LPA in adults as compared with the criterion measure of oxygen uptake (VO2) measured by indirect calorimetry. Methods Sixteen participants (age: 25.38 ± 8.58 years) wore the ActiGraph GT3X+, activPAL, and SenseWear 2 devices during 7 sedentary-to-light activities. VO2 (mL/kg/min) was estimated by means of a portable gas analyzer, Oxycon Mobile (Carefusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA). All data were transformed into metabolic equivalents and analyzed using mean percentage error, equivalence plots, Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistics, and sensitivity/specificity. Results Mean percentage error was lowest for the activPAL for SB (14.9%) and LPA (9.3%) compared with other WMs, which were >21.2%. None of the WMs fell within the equivalency range of ±10% of the criterion mean value. Bland-Altman plots revealed narrower levels of agreement with all WMs for SB than for LPA. Kappa statistics were low for all WMs, and sensitivity and specificity varied by WM type. Conclusion None of the WMs tested in this study were equivalent with the criterion measure (VO2) in estimating sedentary-to-light activities; however, the activPAL had greater overall accuracy in measuring SB and LPA than did the ActiGraph and SenseWear 2 monitors.

KW - Accelerometers

KW - Accuracy

KW - Low intensity

KW - Metabolic estimations

KW - Objective measurement

KW - Sedentary behaviors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010552488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010552488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.10.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010552488

VL - 6

SP - 103

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Sport and Health Science

JF - Journal of Sport and Health Science

SN - 2095-2546

IS - 1

ER -