Wealth and welfare: Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices

Jenny G. Olson, Brent McFerran, Andrea Ketcham, Darren W. Dahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines perceptions of low-income consumers receiving government assistance and the choices they make, showing that this group is viewed differently than those with more resources, even when making identical choices. A series of five experiments reveal that ethical purchases polarize moral judgments: whereas individuals receiving government assistance are perceived as less moral when choosing ethical (vs. conventional) products, income earners, particularly high-income individuals, are perceived as more moral for making the identical choice. Price is a central component of this effect because equating the cost of ethical and conventional goods provides those receiving government assistance some protection against harsh moral judgments when choosing ethically. Moreover, earning one's income drives perceptions of deservingness, or the right to spend as one desires. Those who receive assistance via taxpayer dollars are under greater scrutiny (frequently resulting in harsher moral judgments) by others. In addition to influencing perceptions of individual consumers, the results demonstrate that such attributions extend to groups who make ethical choices on others' behalf, and that these attributions have real monetary consequences for nonprofit organizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberucv096
Pages (from-to)879-896
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 19 2016

Fingerprint

moral judgement
assistance
welfare
income
attribution
non-profit-organization
dollar
purchase
low income
Group
Income
Consumer Choice
Wealth
Consumer choice
experiment
costs
resources
Government
Moral Judgment
Moral judgment

Keywords

  • Attribution theory
  • Equity theory
  • Ethical consumption
  • Income
  • Moral psychology
  • Poverty
  • Prosocial behavior
  • Welfare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Wealth and welfare : Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices. / Olson, Jenny G.; McFerran, Brent; Ketcham, Andrea; Dahl, Darren W.

In: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 42, No. 6, ucv096, 19.04.2016, p. 879-896.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olson, Jenny G. ; McFerran, Brent ; Ketcham, Andrea ; Dahl, Darren W. / Wealth and welfare : Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices. In: Journal of Consumer Research. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 879-896.
@article{c6aa21f7499848a08cf615464546ba66,
title = "Wealth and welfare: Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices",
abstract = "This article examines perceptions of low-income consumers receiving government assistance and the choices they make, showing that this group is viewed differently than those with more resources, even when making identical choices. A series of five experiments reveal that ethical purchases polarize moral judgments: whereas individuals receiving government assistance are perceived as less moral when choosing ethical (vs. conventional) products, income earners, particularly high-income individuals, are perceived as more moral for making the identical choice. Price is a central component of this effect because equating the cost of ethical and conventional goods provides those receiving government assistance some protection against harsh moral judgments when choosing ethically. Moreover, earning one's income drives perceptions of deservingness, or the right to spend as one desires. Those who receive assistance via taxpayer dollars are under greater scrutiny (frequently resulting in harsher moral judgments) by others. In addition to influencing perceptions of individual consumers, the results demonstrate that such attributions extend to groups who make ethical choices on others' behalf, and that these attributions have real monetary consequences for nonprofit organizations.",
keywords = "Attribution theory, Equity theory, Ethical consumption, Income, Moral psychology, Poverty, Prosocial behavior, Welfare",
author = "Olson, {Jenny G.} and Brent McFerran and Andrea Ketcham and Dahl, {Darren W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1093/jcr/ucv096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "879--896",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Research",
issn = "0093-5301",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wealth and welfare

T2 - Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices

AU - Olson, Jenny G.

AU - McFerran, Brent

AU - Ketcham, Andrea

AU - Dahl, Darren W.

PY - 2016/4/19

Y1 - 2016/4/19

N2 - This article examines perceptions of low-income consumers receiving government assistance and the choices they make, showing that this group is viewed differently than those with more resources, even when making identical choices. A series of five experiments reveal that ethical purchases polarize moral judgments: whereas individuals receiving government assistance are perceived as less moral when choosing ethical (vs. conventional) products, income earners, particularly high-income individuals, are perceived as more moral for making the identical choice. Price is a central component of this effect because equating the cost of ethical and conventional goods provides those receiving government assistance some protection against harsh moral judgments when choosing ethically. Moreover, earning one's income drives perceptions of deservingness, or the right to spend as one desires. Those who receive assistance via taxpayer dollars are under greater scrutiny (frequently resulting in harsher moral judgments) by others. In addition to influencing perceptions of individual consumers, the results demonstrate that such attributions extend to groups who make ethical choices on others' behalf, and that these attributions have real monetary consequences for nonprofit organizations.

AB - This article examines perceptions of low-income consumers receiving government assistance and the choices they make, showing that this group is viewed differently than those with more resources, even when making identical choices. A series of five experiments reveal that ethical purchases polarize moral judgments: whereas individuals receiving government assistance are perceived as less moral when choosing ethical (vs. conventional) products, income earners, particularly high-income individuals, are perceived as more moral for making the identical choice. Price is a central component of this effect because equating the cost of ethical and conventional goods provides those receiving government assistance some protection against harsh moral judgments when choosing ethically. Moreover, earning one's income drives perceptions of deservingness, or the right to spend as one desires. Those who receive assistance via taxpayer dollars are under greater scrutiny (frequently resulting in harsher moral judgments) by others. In addition to influencing perceptions of individual consumers, the results demonstrate that such attributions extend to groups who make ethical choices on others' behalf, and that these attributions have real monetary consequences for nonprofit organizations.

KW - Attribution theory

KW - Equity theory

KW - Ethical consumption

KW - Income

KW - Moral psychology

KW - Poverty

KW - Prosocial behavior

KW - Welfare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971607461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971607461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jcr/ucv096

DO - 10.1093/jcr/ucv096

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971607461

VL - 42

SP - 879

EP - 896

JO - Journal of Consumer Research

JF - Journal of Consumer Research

SN - 0093-5301

IS - 6

M1 - ucv096

ER -