Water security

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Climate change, as the dominant paradigm in natural resource policy, is obsolete and should be replaced by the water security paradigm. The climate change paradigm is obsolete because it fails to adequately resonate with the concerns of the general public and fails to integrate fundamental sustainability challenges related to economic development and population growth. The water security paradigm directly addresses the main reasons climate change ultimately matters to most people—droughts, floods, plagues, and wars. Additionally, this new proposed paradigm better integrates climate change concerns with other pressing global sustainability challenges—including that economic development and population growth will require 50% more food and energy and 30% more water by 2030 regardless of climate change. The water security paradigm orients all natural resource policies toward achieving a sustainable quantity and quality of water at acceptable costs and risks. Water security improves upon the climate change paradigm in several ways: it (1) replaces carbon footprints with water footprints as the metric for sustainability monitoring and reporting, (2) restructures natural resource governance at the watershed level with regional, rather than hierarchical, leadership, (3) integrates security and public health concerns into natural resource policies, (4) encourages investment in infrastructure for drought and flood resilience, and (5) facilitates the sustainable implementation of human rights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-200
Number of pages62
JournalNorthwestern University Law Review
Volume112
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

paradigm
climate change
water
natural resources
sustainability
population growth
natural disaster
drought
resilience
economics
human rights
public health
leadership
governance
infrastructure
monitoring
food
energy
costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Water security. / Larson, Rhett.

In: Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 112, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 139-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Larson, R 2017, 'Water security', Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 139-200.
Larson, Rhett. / Water security. In: Northwestern University Law Review. 2017 ; Vol. 112, No. 2. pp. 139-200.
@article{48c67de26767464d916b6dad5fddfde6,
title = "Water security",
abstract = "Climate change, as the dominant paradigm in natural resource policy, is obsolete and should be replaced by the water security paradigm. The climate change paradigm is obsolete because it fails to adequately resonate with the concerns of the general public and fails to integrate fundamental sustainability challenges related to economic development and population growth. The water security paradigm directly addresses the main reasons climate change ultimately matters to most people—droughts, floods, plagues, and wars. Additionally, this new proposed paradigm better integrates climate change concerns with other pressing global sustainability challenges—including that economic development and population growth will require 50{\%} more food and energy and 30{\%} more water by 2030 regardless of climate change. The water security paradigm orients all natural resource policies toward achieving a sustainable quantity and quality of water at acceptable costs and risks. Water security improves upon the climate change paradigm in several ways: it (1) replaces carbon footprints with water footprints as the metric for sustainability monitoring and reporting, (2) restructures natural resource governance at the watershed level with regional, rather than hierarchical, leadership, (3) integrates security and public health concerns into natural resource policies, (4) encourages investment in infrastructure for drought and flood resilience, and (5) facilitates the sustainable implementation of human rights.",
author = "Rhett Larson",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "139--200",
journal = "Northwestern University Law Review",
issn = "0029-3571",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Water security

AU - Larson, Rhett

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Climate change, as the dominant paradigm in natural resource policy, is obsolete and should be replaced by the water security paradigm. The climate change paradigm is obsolete because it fails to adequately resonate with the concerns of the general public and fails to integrate fundamental sustainability challenges related to economic development and population growth. The water security paradigm directly addresses the main reasons climate change ultimately matters to most people—droughts, floods, plagues, and wars. Additionally, this new proposed paradigm better integrates climate change concerns with other pressing global sustainability challenges—including that economic development and population growth will require 50% more food and energy and 30% more water by 2030 regardless of climate change. The water security paradigm orients all natural resource policies toward achieving a sustainable quantity and quality of water at acceptable costs and risks. Water security improves upon the climate change paradigm in several ways: it (1) replaces carbon footprints with water footprints as the metric for sustainability monitoring and reporting, (2) restructures natural resource governance at the watershed level with regional, rather than hierarchical, leadership, (3) integrates security and public health concerns into natural resource policies, (4) encourages investment in infrastructure for drought and flood resilience, and (5) facilitates the sustainable implementation of human rights.

AB - Climate change, as the dominant paradigm in natural resource policy, is obsolete and should be replaced by the water security paradigm. The climate change paradigm is obsolete because it fails to adequately resonate with the concerns of the general public and fails to integrate fundamental sustainability challenges related to economic development and population growth. The water security paradigm directly addresses the main reasons climate change ultimately matters to most people—droughts, floods, plagues, and wars. Additionally, this new proposed paradigm better integrates climate change concerns with other pressing global sustainability challenges—including that economic development and population growth will require 50% more food and energy and 30% more water by 2030 regardless of climate change. The water security paradigm orients all natural resource policies toward achieving a sustainable quantity and quality of water at acceptable costs and risks. Water security improves upon the climate change paradigm in several ways: it (1) replaces carbon footprints with water footprints as the metric for sustainability monitoring and reporting, (2) restructures natural resource governance at the watershed level with regional, rather than hierarchical, leadership, (3) integrates security and public health concerns into natural resource policies, (4) encourages investment in infrastructure for drought and flood resilience, and (5) facilitates the sustainable implementation of human rights.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032966936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032966936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032966936

VL - 112

SP - 139

EP - 200

JO - Northwestern University Law Review

JF - Northwestern University Law Review

SN - 0029-3571

IS - 2

ER -