Warning Signal Efficacy: Assessing the Effects of Color, Iridescence, and Time of Day in the Field

Kimberly V. Pegram, Hanh A. Han, Ronald L. Rutowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Warning coloration deters predators from attacking distasteful or toxic prey. Signal features that influence warning color effectiveness are not well understood, and in particular, we know very little about how effective short-wavelength and iridescent colors are as warning color elements in nature and how warning signal effectiveness changes throughout the day. We tested the effect of these factors on predation risk in nature using specimens of the distasteful pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor. B. philenor adults display both iridescent blue and diffusely reflecting orange components in their warning signal. We painted B. philenor wings to create five different model types: all-black, only-iridescent-blue, only-orange, iridescent-blue-and-orange (intact signal), and matte-blue-and-orange. We placed 25 models in each of 14 replicate field sites for 72 h and checked for attacks three times each day. Model type affected the likelihood of attack; only-orange models were, the only model attacked significantly less than the all-black model. Iridescence did not enhance or decrease warning signal effectiveness in our experiment because matte-blue-and-orange models were attacked at the same rate as iridescent-blue-and-orange models. Time of day did not differentially affect model type. Video recordings of attacks revealed that insectivorous birds were responsible. The results of this experiment, when taken with previous work, indicate that the response to blue warning coloration is likely dependent on predator experience and context, but that iridescence per se does not affect warning signals in a natural context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)861-873
Number of pages13
JournalEthology
Volume121
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Battus philenor
color
predator
predators
effect
Papilionidae
predation risk
butterfly
wavelengths
experiment
predation
bird
wavelength
birds

Keywords

  • Battus philenor
  • Ambient light
  • Aposematism
  • Predation
  • Visual ecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Warning Signal Efficacy : Assessing the Effects of Color, Iridescence, and Time of Day in the Field. / Pegram, Kimberly V.; Han, Hanh A.; Rutowski, Ronald L.

In: Ethology, Vol. 121, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 861-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pegram, Kimberly V. ; Han, Hanh A. ; Rutowski, Ronald L. / Warning Signal Efficacy : Assessing the Effects of Color, Iridescence, and Time of Day in the Field. In: Ethology. 2015 ; Vol. 121, No. 9. pp. 861-873.
@article{1bddb632055443788fea51f5574b915d,
title = "Warning Signal Efficacy: Assessing the Effects of Color, Iridescence, and Time of Day in the Field",
abstract = "Warning coloration deters predators from attacking distasteful or toxic prey. Signal features that influence warning color effectiveness are not well understood, and in particular, we know very little about how effective short-wavelength and iridescent colors are as warning color elements in nature and how warning signal effectiveness changes throughout the day. We tested the effect of these factors on predation risk in nature using specimens of the distasteful pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor. B. philenor adults display both iridescent blue and diffusely reflecting orange components in their warning signal. We painted B. philenor wings to create five different model types: all-black, only-iridescent-blue, only-orange, iridescent-blue-and-orange (intact signal), and matte-blue-and-orange. We placed 25 models in each of 14 replicate field sites for 72 h and checked for attacks three times each day. Model type affected the likelihood of attack; only-orange models were, the only model attacked significantly less than the all-black model. Iridescence did not enhance or decrease warning signal effectiveness in our experiment because matte-blue-and-orange models were attacked at the same rate as iridescent-blue-and-orange models. Time of day did not differentially affect model type. Video recordings of attacks revealed that insectivorous birds were responsible. The results of this experiment, when taken with previous work, indicate that the response to blue warning coloration is likely dependent on predator experience and context, but that iridescence per se does not affect warning signals in a natural context.",
keywords = "Battus philenor, Ambient light, Aposematism, Predation, Visual ecology",
author = "Pegram, {Kimberly V.} and Han, {Hanh A.} and Rutowski, {Ronald L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/eth.12403",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "861--873",
journal = "Ethology",
issn = "0179-1613",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Warning Signal Efficacy

T2 - Assessing the Effects of Color, Iridescence, and Time of Day in the Field

AU - Pegram, Kimberly V.

AU - Han, Hanh A.

AU - Rutowski, Ronald L.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Warning coloration deters predators from attacking distasteful or toxic prey. Signal features that influence warning color effectiveness are not well understood, and in particular, we know very little about how effective short-wavelength and iridescent colors are as warning color elements in nature and how warning signal effectiveness changes throughout the day. We tested the effect of these factors on predation risk in nature using specimens of the distasteful pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor. B. philenor adults display both iridescent blue and diffusely reflecting orange components in their warning signal. We painted B. philenor wings to create five different model types: all-black, only-iridescent-blue, only-orange, iridescent-blue-and-orange (intact signal), and matte-blue-and-orange. We placed 25 models in each of 14 replicate field sites for 72 h and checked for attacks three times each day. Model type affected the likelihood of attack; only-orange models were, the only model attacked significantly less than the all-black model. Iridescence did not enhance or decrease warning signal effectiveness in our experiment because matte-blue-and-orange models were attacked at the same rate as iridescent-blue-and-orange models. Time of day did not differentially affect model type. Video recordings of attacks revealed that insectivorous birds were responsible. The results of this experiment, when taken with previous work, indicate that the response to blue warning coloration is likely dependent on predator experience and context, but that iridescence per se does not affect warning signals in a natural context.

AB - Warning coloration deters predators from attacking distasteful or toxic prey. Signal features that influence warning color effectiveness are not well understood, and in particular, we know very little about how effective short-wavelength and iridescent colors are as warning color elements in nature and how warning signal effectiveness changes throughout the day. We tested the effect of these factors on predation risk in nature using specimens of the distasteful pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor. B. philenor adults display both iridescent blue and diffusely reflecting orange components in their warning signal. We painted B. philenor wings to create five different model types: all-black, only-iridescent-blue, only-orange, iridescent-blue-and-orange (intact signal), and matte-blue-and-orange. We placed 25 models in each of 14 replicate field sites for 72 h and checked for attacks three times each day. Model type affected the likelihood of attack; only-orange models were, the only model attacked significantly less than the all-black model. Iridescence did not enhance or decrease warning signal effectiveness in our experiment because matte-blue-and-orange models were attacked at the same rate as iridescent-blue-and-orange models. Time of day did not differentially affect model type. Video recordings of attacks revealed that insectivorous birds were responsible. The results of this experiment, when taken with previous work, indicate that the response to blue warning coloration is likely dependent on predator experience and context, but that iridescence per se does not affect warning signals in a natural context.

KW - Battus philenor

KW - Ambient light

KW - Aposematism

KW - Predation

KW - Visual ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938745585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938745585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/eth.12403

DO - 10.1111/eth.12403

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938745585

VL - 121

SP - 861

EP - 873

JO - Ethology

JF - Ethology

SN - 0179-1613

IS - 9

ER -