Warning color changes in response to food deprivation in the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor

Kimberly V. Pegram, Alexandra C. Nahm, Ronald L. Rutowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Predation on distasteful animals should favor warning coloration that is relatively conspicuous and phenotypically invariable. However, even among similarly colored individuals there can be variation in their warning signals. In butterflies, individual differences in larval feeding history could cause this variation. The warning signal of the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) consists of both a blue iridescent patch and pigmentbased orange spots on the ventral hindwing. B. philenor males also display a dorsal surface iridescent patch that functions as a sexual indicator signal. A previous study of iridescence in B. philenor found that the iridescent blue on both the dorsal and ventral hind wings is variable and significantly different between lab-reared and field-caught individuals. These differences could be the result of larval food deprivation in the field. Through experimental manipulation of larval diet, larval food deprivation was evaluated as a potential cause of the differences observed between lab and field individuals, and if food deprivation is a source of inter-individual variation in warning signals. B. philenor larvae were food restricted starting at two points in the last larval instar, and one group was fed through pupation. Adult coloration was then compared. Food deprivation led to poorer adult condition, as indicated by lower adult body mass, forewing length, and fat content of stressed individuals. As the level of food deprivation increased, the hue of the iridescent patches on both the dorsal and ventral hind wing shifted to shorter wavelengths, and the chroma of the orange spots decreased. The shifts in iridescent color did not match the differences previously found between lab and field individuals. However, the treatment differences indicate that food deprivation may be a significant source of warning color variation. The differences between the treatment groups are likely detectable by predators, but the effect of the variation on signal effectiveness and function remains to be empirically explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number110
JournalJournal of Insect Science
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Battus philenor
Food Deprivation
Papilionidae
Butterflies
food deprivation
Color
color
Lepidoptera
pupation
Individuality
butterflies
Larva
wavelengths
instars
History
Fats
lipid content
predation
Diet
predators

Keywords

  • aposematic
  • coloration
  • food restriction
  • iridescence
  • pigment-based coloration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Insect Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Warning color changes in response to food deprivation in the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor. / Pegram, Kimberly V.; Nahm, Alexandra C.; Rutowski, Ronald L.

In: Journal of Insect Science, Vol. 13, 110, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bc8c87a0d014aea9fa986a2a3ad9ec9,
title = "Warning color changes in response to food deprivation in the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor",
abstract = "Predation on distasteful animals should favor warning coloration that is relatively conspicuous and phenotypically invariable. However, even among similarly colored individuals there can be variation in their warning signals. In butterflies, individual differences in larval feeding history could cause this variation. The warning signal of the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) consists of both a blue iridescent patch and pigmentbased orange spots on the ventral hindwing. B. philenor males also display a dorsal surface iridescent patch that functions as a sexual indicator signal. A previous study of iridescence in B. philenor found that the iridescent blue on both the dorsal and ventral hind wings is variable and significantly different between lab-reared and field-caught individuals. These differences could be the result of larval food deprivation in the field. Through experimental manipulation of larval diet, larval food deprivation was evaluated as a potential cause of the differences observed between lab and field individuals, and if food deprivation is a source of inter-individual variation in warning signals. B. philenor larvae were food restricted starting at two points in the last larval instar, and one group was fed through pupation. Adult coloration was then compared. Food deprivation led to poorer adult condition, as indicated by lower adult body mass, forewing length, and fat content of stressed individuals. As the level of food deprivation increased, the hue of the iridescent patches on both the dorsal and ventral hind wing shifted to shorter wavelengths, and the chroma of the orange spots decreased. The shifts in iridescent color did not match the differences previously found between lab and field individuals. However, the treatment differences indicate that food deprivation may be a significant source of warning color variation. The differences between the treatment groups are likely detectable by predators, but the effect of the variation on signal effectiveness and function remains to be empirically explored.",
keywords = "aposematic, coloration, food restriction, iridescence, pigment-based coloration",
author = "Pegram, {Kimberly V.} and Nahm, {Alexandra C.} and Rutowski, {Ronald L.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1673/031.013.11001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Insect Science",
issn = "1536-2442",
publisher = "Library of the University of Arizona",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Warning color changes in response to food deprivation in the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor

AU - Pegram, Kimberly V.

AU - Nahm, Alexandra C.

AU - Rutowski, Ronald L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Predation on distasteful animals should favor warning coloration that is relatively conspicuous and phenotypically invariable. However, even among similarly colored individuals there can be variation in their warning signals. In butterflies, individual differences in larval feeding history could cause this variation. The warning signal of the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) consists of both a blue iridescent patch and pigmentbased orange spots on the ventral hindwing. B. philenor males also display a dorsal surface iridescent patch that functions as a sexual indicator signal. A previous study of iridescence in B. philenor found that the iridescent blue on both the dorsal and ventral hind wings is variable and significantly different between lab-reared and field-caught individuals. These differences could be the result of larval food deprivation in the field. Through experimental manipulation of larval diet, larval food deprivation was evaluated as a potential cause of the differences observed between lab and field individuals, and if food deprivation is a source of inter-individual variation in warning signals. B. philenor larvae were food restricted starting at two points in the last larval instar, and one group was fed through pupation. Adult coloration was then compared. Food deprivation led to poorer adult condition, as indicated by lower adult body mass, forewing length, and fat content of stressed individuals. As the level of food deprivation increased, the hue of the iridescent patches on both the dorsal and ventral hind wing shifted to shorter wavelengths, and the chroma of the orange spots decreased. The shifts in iridescent color did not match the differences previously found between lab and field individuals. However, the treatment differences indicate that food deprivation may be a significant source of warning color variation. The differences between the treatment groups are likely detectable by predators, but the effect of the variation on signal effectiveness and function remains to be empirically explored.

AB - Predation on distasteful animals should favor warning coloration that is relatively conspicuous and phenotypically invariable. However, even among similarly colored individuals there can be variation in their warning signals. In butterflies, individual differences in larval feeding history could cause this variation. The warning signal of the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) consists of both a blue iridescent patch and pigmentbased orange spots on the ventral hindwing. B. philenor males also display a dorsal surface iridescent patch that functions as a sexual indicator signal. A previous study of iridescence in B. philenor found that the iridescent blue on both the dorsal and ventral hind wings is variable and significantly different between lab-reared and field-caught individuals. These differences could be the result of larval food deprivation in the field. Through experimental manipulation of larval diet, larval food deprivation was evaluated as a potential cause of the differences observed between lab and field individuals, and if food deprivation is a source of inter-individual variation in warning signals. B. philenor larvae were food restricted starting at two points in the last larval instar, and one group was fed through pupation. Adult coloration was then compared. Food deprivation led to poorer adult condition, as indicated by lower adult body mass, forewing length, and fat content of stressed individuals. As the level of food deprivation increased, the hue of the iridescent patches on both the dorsal and ventral hind wing shifted to shorter wavelengths, and the chroma of the orange spots decreased. The shifts in iridescent color did not match the differences previously found between lab and field individuals. However, the treatment differences indicate that food deprivation may be a significant source of warning color variation. The differences between the treatment groups are likely detectable by predators, but the effect of the variation on signal effectiveness and function remains to be empirically explored.

KW - aposematic

KW - coloration

KW - food restriction

KW - iridescence

KW - pigment-based coloration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898905506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898905506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1673/031.013.11001

DO - 10.1673/031.013.11001

M3 - Article

C2 - 24735188

AN - SCOPUS:84898905506

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Insect Science

JF - Journal of Insect Science

SN - 1536-2442

M1 - 110

ER -