Warmth and competence on the witness stand: Implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses

Tess Neal, Rosanna E. Guadagno, Cassie A. Eno, Stanley L. Brodsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we examined how manipulations of likeability and knowledge affected mock jurors' perceptions of female and male expert witness credibility (n = 290). Our findings extend the person-perception literature by demonstrating how warmth and competence overlap with existing conceptions of likeability and knowledge in the psycholegal domain. We found that experts high in likeability, knowledge, or both were perceived equally positively, regardless of gender, in a death penalty sentencing context. Gender differences emerged when the expert was low in likeability or knowledge. In these conditions the male expert was perceived more positively than the comparable female expert. Although intermediate judgments (e.g., perceptions of credibility) were affected by our manipulations, ultimate decisions (e.g., sentencing) were not. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-497
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume40
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Expert Testimony
Mental Competency
Capital Punishment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Warmth and competence on the witness stand : Implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses. / Neal, Tess; Guadagno, Rosanna E.; Eno, Cassie A.; Brodsky, Stanley L.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2012, p. 488-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64104643701942cca184ac72691197ce,
title = "Warmth and competence on the witness stand: Implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses",
abstract = "In this study, we examined how manipulations of likeability and knowledge affected mock jurors' perceptions of female and male expert witness credibility (n = 290). Our findings extend the person-perception literature by demonstrating how warmth and competence overlap with existing conceptions of likeability and knowledge in the psycholegal domain. We found that experts high in likeability, knowledge, or both were perceived equally positively, regardless of gender, in a death penalty sentencing context. Gender differences emerged when the expert was low in likeability or knowledge. In these conditions the male expert was perceived more positively than the comparable female expert. Although intermediate judgments (e.g., perceptions of credibility) were affected by our manipulations, ultimate decisions (e.g., sentencing) were not. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.",
author = "Tess Neal and Guadagno, {Rosanna E.} and Eno, {Cassie A.} and Brodsky, {Stanley L.}",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "488--497",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Warmth and competence on the witness stand

T2 - Implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses

AU - Neal, Tess

AU - Guadagno, Rosanna E.

AU - Eno, Cassie A.

AU - Brodsky, Stanley L.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this study, we examined how manipulations of likeability and knowledge affected mock jurors' perceptions of female and male expert witness credibility (n = 290). Our findings extend the person-perception literature by demonstrating how warmth and competence overlap with existing conceptions of likeability and knowledge in the psycholegal domain. We found that experts high in likeability, knowledge, or both were perceived equally positively, regardless of gender, in a death penalty sentencing context. Gender differences emerged when the expert was low in likeability or knowledge. In these conditions the male expert was perceived more positively than the comparable female expert. Although intermediate judgments (e.g., perceptions of credibility) were affected by our manipulations, ultimate decisions (e.g., sentencing) were not. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

AB - In this study, we examined how manipulations of likeability and knowledge affected mock jurors' perceptions of female and male expert witness credibility (n = 290). Our findings extend the person-perception literature by demonstrating how warmth and competence overlap with existing conceptions of likeability and knowledge in the psycholegal domain. We found that experts high in likeability, knowledge, or both were perceived equally positively, regardless of gender, in a death penalty sentencing context. Gender differences emerged when the expert was low in likeability or knowledge. In these conditions the male expert was perceived more positively than the comparable female expert. Although intermediate judgments (e.g., perceptions of credibility) were affected by our manipulations, ultimate decisions (e.g., sentencing) were not. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871440144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871440144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23233470

AN - SCOPUS:84871440144

VL - 40

SP - 488

EP - 497

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 4

ER -