Waging War on Climate Change: Mapping Energy Policies to Their Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Levels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The emergence of climate change and energy security as increasingly important issues has amplified the need for energy policies that manage these issues. While policy-makers adopt energy policies that address climate change and energy security, these policies often include broad strategy statements and may not include specific implementation plans. Accordingly, effectiveness of these energy policies is also evaluated at the strategic level, which may not appropriately evaluate the policies beyond how the policy met its strategic goal(s). This paper assesses the feasibility of mapping energy policies to their strategic, tactical, and operational (STO) levels through two case studies. The first case study assesses the European Union (EU) 2020 energy and climate policy known as EU 20-20-20 as well as the United States' Executive Orders 13514 and 13423 that mandate energy and greenhouse gas reductions for federal buildings. Results of this paper illuminate potential advantages and limitations of using STO as an energy policy assessment tool and the mapping effort described in this paper suggests that strategic, tactical and operational levels should be addressed explicitly in future energy policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-17
Number of pages7
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume145
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Energy policy
Climate Change
Climate change
Energy security
European Union
Greenhouse gases
Warfare
Administrative Personnel
Climate
Gases

Keywords

  • Climate Change
  • Energy Policy
  • EO 13514
  • EU 20-20 20
  • Operational
  • Strategic
  • Tactical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{42619e7611aa4daba5852ae9c5381cad,
title = "Waging War on Climate Change: Mapping Energy Policies to Their Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Levels",
abstract = "The emergence of climate change and energy security as increasingly important issues has amplified the need for energy policies that manage these issues. While policy-makers adopt energy policies that address climate change and energy security, these policies often include broad strategy statements and may not include specific implementation plans. Accordingly, effectiveness of these energy policies is also evaluated at the strategic level, which may not appropriately evaluate the policies beyond how the policy met its strategic goal(s). This paper assesses the feasibility of mapping energy policies to their strategic, tactical, and operational (STO) levels through two case studies. The first case study assesses the European Union (EU) 2020 energy and climate policy known as EU 20-20-20 as well as the United States' Executive Orders 13514 and 13423 that mandate energy and greenhouse gas reductions for federal buildings. Results of this paper illuminate potential advantages and limitations of using STO as an energy policy assessment tool and the mapping effort described in this paper suggests that strategic, tactical and operational levels should be addressed explicitly in future energy policies.",
keywords = "Climate Change, Energy Policy, EO 13514, EU 20-20 20, Operational, Strategic, Tactical",
author = "R. Arababadi and Kristen Parrish and {El Asmar}, Mounir",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "11--17",
journal = "Scanning Electron Microscopy",
issn = "0586-5581",
publisher = "Scanning Microscopy International",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waging War on Climate Change

T2 - Mapping Energy Policies to Their Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Levels

AU - Arababadi, R.

AU - Parrish, Kristen

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The emergence of climate change and energy security as increasingly important issues has amplified the need for energy policies that manage these issues. While policy-makers adopt energy policies that address climate change and energy security, these policies often include broad strategy statements and may not include specific implementation plans. Accordingly, effectiveness of these energy policies is also evaluated at the strategic level, which may not appropriately evaluate the policies beyond how the policy met its strategic goal(s). This paper assesses the feasibility of mapping energy policies to their strategic, tactical, and operational (STO) levels through two case studies. The first case study assesses the European Union (EU) 2020 energy and climate policy known as EU 20-20-20 as well as the United States' Executive Orders 13514 and 13423 that mandate energy and greenhouse gas reductions for federal buildings. Results of this paper illuminate potential advantages and limitations of using STO as an energy policy assessment tool and the mapping effort described in this paper suggests that strategic, tactical and operational levels should be addressed explicitly in future energy policies.

AB - The emergence of climate change and energy security as increasingly important issues has amplified the need for energy policies that manage these issues. While policy-makers adopt energy policies that address climate change and energy security, these policies often include broad strategy statements and may not include specific implementation plans. Accordingly, effectiveness of these energy policies is also evaluated at the strategic level, which may not appropriately evaluate the policies beyond how the policy met its strategic goal(s). This paper assesses the feasibility of mapping energy policies to their strategic, tactical, and operational (STO) levels through two case studies. The first case study assesses the European Union (EU) 2020 energy and climate policy known as EU 20-20-20 as well as the United States' Executive Orders 13514 and 13423 that mandate energy and greenhouse gas reductions for federal buildings. Results of this paper illuminate potential advantages and limitations of using STO as an energy policy assessment tool and the mapping effort described in this paper suggests that strategic, tactical and operational levels should be addressed explicitly in future energy policies.

KW - Climate Change

KW - Energy Policy

KW - EO 13514

KW - EU 20-20 20

KW - Operational

KW - Strategic

KW - Tactical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999861946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999861946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84999861946

VL - 145

SP - 11

EP - 17

JO - Scanning Electron Microscopy

JF - Scanning Electron Microscopy

SN - 0586-5581

ER -