Vowel acoustics in dysarthria

Speech disorder diagnosis and classification

Kaitlin L. Lansforda, Julie Liss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which vowel metrics are capable of distinguishing healthy from dysarthric speech and among different forms of dysarthria. Method: A variety of vowel metrics were derived from spectral and temporal measurements of vowel tokens embedded in phrases produced by 45 speakers with dysarthria and 12 speakers with no history of neurological disease. Via means testing and discriminant function analysis (DFA), the acoustic metrics were used to (a) detect the presence of dysarthria and (b) classify the dysarthria subtype. Results: Significant differences between dysarthric and healthy control speakers were revealed for all vowel metrics. However, the results of the DFA demonstrated some metrics (particularly metrics that capture vowel distinctiveness) to be more sensitive and specific predictors of dysarthria. Only the vowel metrics that captured slope of the second formant (F2) demonstrated between-group differences across the dysarthrias. However, when subjected to DFA, these metrics proved unreliable classifiers of dysarthria subtype. Conclusion: The results of these analyses suggest that some vowel metrics may be useful clinically for the detection of dysarthria but may not be reliable indicators of dysarthria subtype using the current dysarthria classification scheme.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-67
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Speech Disorders
Dysarthria
speech disorder
Acoustics
acoustics
Discriminant Analysis
Disease
history
Group

Keywords

  • Acoustics
  • Diagnostics
  • Dysarthria
  • Speech production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Vowel acoustics in dysarthria : Speech disorder diagnosis and classification. / Lansforda, Kaitlin L.; Liss, Julie.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 57, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 57-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bce32c58c684e139f8e6d4e21cfbc6b,
title = "Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: Speech disorder diagnosis and classification",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which vowel metrics are capable of distinguishing healthy from dysarthric speech and among different forms of dysarthria. Method: A variety of vowel metrics were derived from spectral and temporal measurements of vowel tokens embedded in phrases produced by 45 speakers with dysarthria and 12 speakers with no history of neurological disease. Via means testing and discriminant function analysis (DFA), the acoustic metrics were used to (a) detect the presence of dysarthria and (b) classify the dysarthria subtype. Results: Significant differences between dysarthric and healthy control speakers were revealed for all vowel metrics. However, the results of the DFA demonstrated some metrics (particularly metrics that capture vowel distinctiveness) to be more sensitive and specific predictors of dysarthria. Only the vowel metrics that captured slope of the second formant (F2) demonstrated between-group differences across the dysarthrias. However, when subjected to DFA, these metrics proved unreliable classifiers of dysarthria subtype. Conclusion: The results of these analyses suggest that some vowel metrics may be useful clinically for the detection of dysarthria but may not be reliable indicators of dysarthria subtype using the current dysarthria classification scheme.",
keywords = "Acoustics, Diagnostics, Dysarthria, Speech production",
author = "Lansforda, {Kaitlin L.} and Julie Liss",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0262)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "57--67",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vowel acoustics in dysarthria

T2 - Speech disorder diagnosis and classification

AU - Lansforda, Kaitlin L.

AU - Liss, Julie

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which vowel metrics are capable of distinguishing healthy from dysarthric speech and among different forms of dysarthria. Method: A variety of vowel metrics were derived from spectral and temporal measurements of vowel tokens embedded in phrases produced by 45 speakers with dysarthria and 12 speakers with no history of neurological disease. Via means testing and discriminant function analysis (DFA), the acoustic metrics were used to (a) detect the presence of dysarthria and (b) classify the dysarthria subtype. Results: Significant differences between dysarthric and healthy control speakers were revealed for all vowel metrics. However, the results of the DFA demonstrated some metrics (particularly metrics that capture vowel distinctiveness) to be more sensitive and specific predictors of dysarthria. Only the vowel metrics that captured slope of the second formant (F2) demonstrated between-group differences across the dysarthrias. However, when subjected to DFA, these metrics proved unreliable classifiers of dysarthria subtype. Conclusion: The results of these analyses suggest that some vowel metrics may be useful clinically for the detection of dysarthria but may not be reliable indicators of dysarthria subtype using the current dysarthria classification scheme.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which vowel metrics are capable of distinguishing healthy from dysarthric speech and among different forms of dysarthria. Method: A variety of vowel metrics were derived from spectral and temporal measurements of vowel tokens embedded in phrases produced by 45 speakers with dysarthria and 12 speakers with no history of neurological disease. Via means testing and discriminant function analysis (DFA), the acoustic metrics were used to (a) detect the presence of dysarthria and (b) classify the dysarthria subtype. Results: Significant differences between dysarthric and healthy control speakers were revealed for all vowel metrics. However, the results of the DFA demonstrated some metrics (particularly metrics that capture vowel distinctiveness) to be more sensitive and specific predictors of dysarthria. Only the vowel metrics that captured slope of the second formant (F2) demonstrated between-group differences across the dysarthrias. However, when subjected to DFA, these metrics proved unreliable classifiers of dysarthria subtype. Conclusion: The results of these analyses suggest that some vowel metrics may be useful clinically for the detection of dysarthria but may not be reliable indicators of dysarthria subtype using the current dysarthria classification scheme.

KW - Acoustics

KW - Diagnostics

KW - Dysarthria

KW - Speech production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897695961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897695961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0262)

DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0262)

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 57

EP - 67

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 1

ER -