Voter turnout in presidential primaries: A cross-sectional examination

Patrick J. Kenney, Tom W. Rice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decades of individual and aggregate level research suggest that three sets of factors influence voter turnout: the socioeconomic makeup of the potential voter; legal restrictions on voting; and the political context of each election. In this brief study, we use state-level data to test whether these factors combine to account for variations in turnout rates in the electoral arena of presidential primaries. As expected, high turnout is associated with states which have high median levels of education, lenient legal restrictions on voting, and a history of competitive two-party elections. Also congruent with our expectations, but at odds with research of other electoral arenas, high turnout in presidential primaries is unrelated to high campaign spending or close elections. We contend that spending in presidential primaries may be simply too low to stimulate turnout and that close primaries do not enhance turnout because voters are often unaware that the pending election will be close.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-112
Number of pages12
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

voter turnout
election
examination
voting
level of education
voter
campaign
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Voter turnout in presidential primaries : A cross-sectional examination. / Kenney, Patrick J.; Rice, Tom W.

In: Political Behavior, Vol. 7, No. 1, 03.1985, p. 101-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65d9ed83b696472e81dcc81b33d14232,
title = "Voter turnout in presidential primaries: A cross-sectional examination",
abstract = "Decades of individual and aggregate level research suggest that three sets of factors influence voter turnout: the socioeconomic makeup of the potential voter; legal restrictions on voting; and the political context of each election. In this brief study, we use state-level data to test whether these factors combine to account for variations in turnout rates in the electoral arena of presidential primaries. As expected, high turnout is associated with states which have high median levels of education, lenient legal restrictions on voting, and a history of competitive two-party elections. Also congruent with our expectations, but at odds with research of other electoral arenas, high turnout in presidential primaries is unrelated to high campaign spending or close elections. We contend that spending in presidential primaries may be simply too low to stimulate turnout and that close primaries do not enhance turnout because voters are often unaware that the pending election will be close.",
author = "Kenney, {Patrick J.} and Rice, {Tom W.}",
year = "1985",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF00987264",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "101--112",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voter turnout in presidential primaries

T2 - A cross-sectional examination

AU - Kenney, Patrick J.

AU - Rice, Tom W.

PY - 1985/3

Y1 - 1985/3

N2 - Decades of individual and aggregate level research suggest that three sets of factors influence voter turnout: the socioeconomic makeup of the potential voter; legal restrictions on voting; and the political context of each election. In this brief study, we use state-level data to test whether these factors combine to account for variations in turnout rates in the electoral arena of presidential primaries. As expected, high turnout is associated with states which have high median levels of education, lenient legal restrictions on voting, and a history of competitive two-party elections. Also congruent with our expectations, but at odds with research of other electoral arenas, high turnout in presidential primaries is unrelated to high campaign spending or close elections. We contend that spending in presidential primaries may be simply too low to stimulate turnout and that close primaries do not enhance turnout because voters are often unaware that the pending election will be close.

AB - Decades of individual and aggregate level research suggest that three sets of factors influence voter turnout: the socioeconomic makeup of the potential voter; legal restrictions on voting; and the political context of each election. In this brief study, we use state-level data to test whether these factors combine to account for variations in turnout rates in the electoral arena of presidential primaries. As expected, high turnout is associated with states which have high median levels of education, lenient legal restrictions on voting, and a history of competitive two-party elections. Also congruent with our expectations, but at odds with research of other electoral arenas, high turnout in presidential primaries is unrelated to high campaign spending or close elections. We contend that spending in presidential primaries may be simply too low to stimulate turnout and that close primaries do not enhance turnout because voters are often unaware that the pending election will be close.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001462507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001462507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00987264

DO - 10.1007/BF00987264

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001462507

VL - 7

SP - 101

EP - 112

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 1

ER -