Voluntary service and state honours in twentieth-century britain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The importance of the honours system as an institution in British politics and public life has frequently been underestimated. At the end of the First World War, the British government prioritized voluntary service to the state as an area which the honours system should reward more than others through the newly created Order of the British Empire. However, after the war the Order changed to focus more on civil servants, soldiers, and the broad category of 'local service'. The latter could include volunteers, but more often did not. Various attempts to democratize honours through reforms from the 1960s focused on rewarding a wider range of service. The most successful of these was John Major's honours reform programme in 1993, which returned volunteer service to the forefront of the public image of honours. While these reforms were not as egalitarian as they seemed, they were successful because they integrated an ideology of crown honours with the other functions of the modern monarchy and opened up the honours system to a wider potential set of recipients. At the same time, they maintained a hierarchical structure that meant that elites who had traditionally enjoyed the exclusivity of high honours continued to do so.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-661
Number of pages21
JournalHistorical Journal
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 11 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Volunteers
World War I
1960s
Hierarchical Structure
Monarchy
British Empire
John Major
British Government
Elites
Exclusivity
British Politics
Reward System
Public Life
Soldiers
Recipient
Ideology
Public Image
Servants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History

Cite this

Voluntary service and state honours in twentieth-century britain. / Harper, Tobias.

In: Historical Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2, 11.05.2015, p. 641-661.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{998d3e1f803044c3b828d5b9ad08152f,
title = "Voluntary service and state honours in twentieth-century britain",
abstract = "The importance of the honours system as an institution in British politics and public life has frequently been underestimated. At the end of the First World War, the British government prioritized voluntary service to the state as an area which the honours system should reward more than others through the newly created Order of the British Empire. However, after the war the Order changed to focus more on civil servants, soldiers, and the broad category of 'local service'. The latter could include volunteers, but more often did not. Various attempts to democratize honours through reforms from the 1960s focused on rewarding a wider range of service. The most successful of these was John Major's honours reform programme in 1993, which returned volunteer service to the forefront of the public image of honours. While these reforms were not as egalitarian as they seemed, they were successful because they integrated an ideology of crown honours with the other functions of the modern monarchy and opened up the honours system to a wider potential set of recipients. At the same time, they maintained a hierarchical structure that meant that elites who had traditionally enjoyed the exclusivity of high honours continued to do so.",
author = "Tobias Harper",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1017/S0018246X1400048X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "641--661",
journal = "Historical Journal",
issn = "0018-246X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voluntary service and state honours in twentieth-century britain

AU - Harper, Tobias

PY - 2015/5/11

Y1 - 2015/5/11

N2 - The importance of the honours system as an institution in British politics and public life has frequently been underestimated. At the end of the First World War, the British government prioritized voluntary service to the state as an area which the honours system should reward more than others through the newly created Order of the British Empire. However, after the war the Order changed to focus more on civil servants, soldiers, and the broad category of 'local service'. The latter could include volunteers, but more often did not. Various attempts to democratize honours through reforms from the 1960s focused on rewarding a wider range of service. The most successful of these was John Major's honours reform programme in 1993, which returned volunteer service to the forefront of the public image of honours. While these reforms were not as egalitarian as they seemed, they were successful because they integrated an ideology of crown honours with the other functions of the modern monarchy and opened up the honours system to a wider potential set of recipients. At the same time, they maintained a hierarchical structure that meant that elites who had traditionally enjoyed the exclusivity of high honours continued to do so.

AB - The importance of the honours system as an institution in British politics and public life has frequently been underestimated. At the end of the First World War, the British government prioritized voluntary service to the state as an area which the honours system should reward more than others through the newly created Order of the British Empire. However, after the war the Order changed to focus more on civil servants, soldiers, and the broad category of 'local service'. The latter could include volunteers, but more often did not. Various attempts to democratize honours through reforms from the 1960s focused on rewarding a wider range of service. The most successful of these was John Major's honours reform programme in 1993, which returned volunteer service to the forefront of the public image of honours. While these reforms were not as egalitarian as they seemed, they were successful because they integrated an ideology of crown honours with the other functions of the modern monarchy and opened up the honours system to a wider potential set of recipients. At the same time, they maintained a hierarchical structure that meant that elites who had traditionally enjoyed the exclusivity of high honours continued to do so.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929857064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929857064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0018246X1400048X

DO - 10.1017/S0018246X1400048X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929857064

VL - 58

SP - 641

EP - 661

JO - Historical Journal

JF - Historical Journal

SN - 0018-246X

IS - 2

ER -