Visualizing 3D Objects From 2D Cross Sectional Images Displayed In-Situ Versus Ex-Situ

Bing Wu, Roberta L. Klatzky, George Stetten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present research investigates how mental visualization of a 3D object from 2D cross sectional images is influenced by displacing the images from the source object, as is customary in medical imaging. Three experiments were conducted to assess people's ability to integrate spatial information over a series of cross sectional images in order to visualize an object posed in 3D space. Participants used a hand-held tool to reveal a virtual rod as a sequence of cross-sectional images, which were displayed either directly in the space of exploration (in-situ) or displaced to a remote screen (ex-situ). They manipulated a response stylus to match the virtual rod's pitch (vertical slant), yaw (horizontal slant), or both. Consistent with the hypothesis that spatial colocation of image and source object facilitates mental visualization, we found that although single dimensions of slant were judged accurately with both displays, judging pitch and yaw simultaneously produced differences in systematic error between in-situ and ex-situ displays. Ex-situ imaging also exhibited errors such that the magnitude of the response was approximately correct but the direction was reversed. Regression analysis indicated that the in-situ judgments were primarily based on spatiotemporal visualization, while the ex-situ judgments relied on an ad hoc, screen-based heuristic. These findings suggest that in-situ displays may be useful in clinical practice by reducing error and facilitating the ability of radiologists to visualize 3D anatomy from cross sectional images.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-59
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Yaws
Aptitude
Cross-Sectional Anatomy
Space Flight
Diagnostic Imaging
Hand
Regression Analysis
Research
Radiologists
Direction compound
Heuristics

Keywords

  • anorthoscopic
  • cross sections
  • integration
  • spatiotemporal
  • visualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Visualizing 3D Objects From 2D Cross Sectional Images Displayed In-Situ Versus Ex-Situ. / Wu, Bing; Klatzky, Roberta L.; Stetten, George.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 16, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 45-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Bing ; Klatzky, Roberta L. ; Stetten, George. / Visualizing 3D Objects From 2D Cross Sectional Images Displayed In-Situ Versus Ex-Situ. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 45-59.
@article{ccac4c66dcd94b7f9a1786ff391e639f,
title = "Visualizing 3D Objects From 2D Cross Sectional Images Displayed In-Situ Versus Ex-Situ",
abstract = "The present research investigates how mental visualization of a 3D object from 2D cross sectional images is influenced by displacing the images from the source object, as is customary in medical imaging. Three experiments were conducted to assess people's ability to integrate spatial information over a series of cross sectional images in order to visualize an object posed in 3D space. Participants used a hand-held tool to reveal a virtual rod as a sequence of cross-sectional images, which were displayed either directly in the space of exploration (in-situ) or displaced to a remote screen (ex-situ). They manipulated a response stylus to match the virtual rod's pitch (vertical slant), yaw (horizontal slant), or both. Consistent with the hypothesis that spatial colocation of image and source object facilitates mental visualization, we found that although single dimensions of slant were judged accurately with both displays, judging pitch and yaw simultaneously produced differences in systematic error between in-situ and ex-situ displays. Ex-situ imaging also exhibited errors such that the magnitude of the response was approximately correct but the direction was reversed. Regression analysis indicated that the in-situ judgments were primarily based on spatiotemporal visualization, while the ex-situ judgments relied on an ad hoc, screen-based heuristic. These findings suggest that in-situ displays may be useful in clinical practice by reducing error and facilitating the ability of radiologists to visualize 3D anatomy from cross sectional images.",
keywords = "anorthoscopic, cross sections, integration, spatiotemporal, visualization",
author = "Bing Wu and Klatzky, {Roberta L.} and George Stetten",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/a0018373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "45--59",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied",
issn = "1076-898X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visualizing 3D Objects From 2D Cross Sectional Images Displayed In-Situ Versus Ex-Situ

AU - Wu, Bing

AU - Klatzky, Roberta L.

AU - Stetten, George

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - The present research investigates how mental visualization of a 3D object from 2D cross sectional images is influenced by displacing the images from the source object, as is customary in medical imaging. Three experiments were conducted to assess people's ability to integrate spatial information over a series of cross sectional images in order to visualize an object posed in 3D space. Participants used a hand-held tool to reveal a virtual rod as a sequence of cross-sectional images, which were displayed either directly in the space of exploration (in-situ) or displaced to a remote screen (ex-situ). They manipulated a response stylus to match the virtual rod's pitch (vertical slant), yaw (horizontal slant), or both. Consistent with the hypothesis that spatial colocation of image and source object facilitates mental visualization, we found that although single dimensions of slant were judged accurately with both displays, judging pitch and yaw simultaneously produced differences in systematic error between in-situ and ex-situ displays. Ex-situ imaging also exhibited errors such that the magnitude of the response was approximately correct but the direction was reversed. Regression analysis indicated that the in-situ judgments were primarily based on spatiotemporal visualization, while the ex-situ judgments relied on an ad hoc, screen-based heuristic. These findings suggest that in-situ displays may be useful in clinical practice by reducing error and facilitating the ability of radiologists to visualize 3D anatomy from cross sectional images.

AB - The present research investigates how mental visualization of a 3D object from 2D cross sectional images is influenced by displacing the images from the source object, as is customary in medical imaging. Three experiments were conducted to assess people's ability to integrate spatial information over a series of cross sectional images in order to visualize an object posed in 3D space. Participants used a hand-held tool to reveal a virtual rod as a sequence of cross-sectional images, which were displayed either directly in the space of exploration (in-situ) or displaced to a remote screen (ex-situ). They manipulated a response stylus to match the virtual rod's pitch (vertical slant), yaw (horizontal slant), or both. Consistent with the hypothesis that spatial colocation of image and source object facilitates mental visualization, we found that although single dimensions of slant were judged accurately with both displays, judging pitch and yaw simultaneously produced differences in systematic error between in-situ and ex-situ displays. Ex-situ imaging also exhibited errors such that the magnitude of the response was approximately correct but the direction was reversed. Regression analysis indicated that the in-situ judgments were primarily based on spatiotemporal visualization, while the ex-situ judgments relied on an ad hoc, screen-based heuristic. These findings suggest that in-situ displays may be useful in clinical practice by reducing error and facilitating the ability of radiologists to visualize 3D anatomy from cross sectional images.

KW - anorthoscopic

KW - cross sections

KW - integration

KW - spatiotemporal

KW - visualization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950506607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950506607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0018373

DO - 10.1037/a0018373

M3 - Article

C2 - 20350043

AN - SCOPUS:77950506607

VL - 16

SP - 45

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

SN - 1076-898X

IS - 1

ER -