Visual misperception in aviation: Glide path performance in a black hole environment

Randy Gibb, Roger Schvaneveldt, Robert Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We sought to improve understanding of visual perception in aviation to mitigate mishaps in approaches to landing. Background: Research has attempted to identify the most salient visual cues for glide path performance in impoverished visual conditions. Numerous aviation accidents caused by glide path overestimation (GPO) have occurred when a low glide path was induced by a black hole illusion (BHI) in featureless terrain during night approaches. Method: Twenty pilots flew simulated approaches under various visual cues of random terrain objects and approach lighting system (ALS) configurations. Performance was assessed relative to the desired 3° glide path in terms of precision, bias, and stability. Results: With the high-ratio (long, narrow) runway, the overall performance between 8.3 and 0.9 km from the runway depicted a concave approach shape found in BHI mishaps. The addition of random terrain objects failed to improve glide path performance, and an ALS commonly used at airports induced GPO and the resulting low glide path. The worst performance, however, resulted from a combination ALS consisting of both side and approach lights. Surprisingly, novice pilots flew more stable approaches than did experienced pilots. Conclusions: Low, unsafe approaches occur frequently in conditions with limited global and local visual cues. Approach lights lateral of the runway may counter the bias of the BHI. The variability suggested a proactive, cue-seeking behavior among experienced pilots as compared with novice pilots. Application: Visual spatial disorientation training in flight simulators should be used to demonstrate visual misperceptions in black hole environments and reduce pilots' confidence in their limited visual capabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)699-711
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Factors
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Aviation
air traffic
Lighting
Cues
work environment
Aircraft accidents
performance
Flight simulators
Landing
Airports
Aviation Accidents
disorientation
visual perception
Light
Confusion
trend
Visual Perception
airport
flight
accident

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Visual misperception in aviation : Glide path performance in a black hole environment. / Gibb, Randy; Schvaneveldt, Roger; Gray, Robert.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 50, No. 4, 08.2008, p. 699-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gibb, Randy ; Schvaneveldt, Roger ; Gray, Robert. / Visual misperception in aviation : Glide path performance in a black hole environment. In: Human Factors. 2008 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 699-711.
@article{ed1b55ed83df4282b0de4a6650ed7cae,
title = "Visual misperception in aviation: Glide path performance in a black hole environment",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to improve understanding of visual perception in aviation to mitigate mishaps in approaches to landing. Background: Research has attempted to identify the most salient visual cues for glide path performance in impoverished visual conditions. Numerous aviation accidents caused by glide path overestimation (GPO) have occurred when a low glide path was induced by a black hole illusion (BHI) in featureless terrain during night approaches. Method: Twenty pilots flew simulated approaches under various visual cues of random terrain objects and approach lighting system (ALS) configurations. Performance was assessed relative to the desired 3° glide path in terms of precision, bias, and stability. Results: With the high-ratio (long, narrow) runway, the overall performance between 8.3 and 0.9 km from the runway depicted a concave approach shape found in BHI mishaps. The addition of random terrain objects failed to improve glide path performance, and an ALS commonly used at airports induced GPO and the resulting low glide path. The worst performance, however, resulted from a combination ALS consisting of both side and approach lights. Surprisingly, novice pilots flew more stable approaches than did experienced pilots. Conclusions: Low, unsafe approaches occur frequently in conditions with limited global and local visual cues. Approach lights lateral of the runway may counter the bias of the BHI. The variability suggested a proactive, cue-seeking behavior among experienced pilots as compared with novice pilots. Application: Visual spatial disorientation training in flight simulators should be used to demonstrate visual misperceptions in black hole environments and reduce pilots' confidence in their limited visual capabilities.",
author = "Randy Gibb and Roger Schvaneveldt and Robert Gray",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1518/001872008X288619",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "699--711",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual misperception in aviation

T2 - Glide path performance in a black hole environment

AU - Gibb, Randy

AU - Schvaneveldt, Roger

AU - Gray, Robert

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Objective: We sought to improve understanding of visual perception in aviation to mitigate mishaps in approaches to landing. Background: Research has attempted to identify the most salient visual cues for glide path performance in impoverished visual conditions. Numerous aviation accidents caused by glide path overestimation (GPO) have occurred when a low glide path was induced by a black hole illusion (BHI) in featureless terrain during night approaches. Method: Twenty pilots flew simulated approaches under various visual cues of random terrain objects and approach lighting system (ALS) configurations. Performance was assessed relative to the desired 3° glide path in terms of precision, bias, and stability. Results: With the high-ratio (long, narrow) runway, the overall performance between 8.3 and 0.9 km from the runway depicted a concave approach shape found in BHI mishaps. The addition of random terrain objects failed to improve glide path performance, and an ALS commonly used at airports induced GPO and the resulting low glide path. The worst performance, however, resulted from a combination ALS consisting of both side and approach lights. Surprisingly, novice pilots flew more stable approaches than did experienced pilots. Conclusions: Low, unsafe approaches occur frequently in conditions with limited global and local visual cues. Approach lights lateral of the runway may counter the bias of the BHI. The variability suggested a proactive, cue-seeking behavior among experienced pilots as compared with novice pilots. Application: Visual spatial disorientation training in flight simulators should be used to demonstrate visual misperceptions in black hole environments and reduce pilots' confidence in their limited visual capabilities.

AB - Objective: We sought to improve understanding of visual perception in aviation to mitigate mishaps in approaches to landing. Background: Research has attempted to identify the most salient visual cues for glide path performance in impoverished visual conditions. Numerous aviation accidents caused by glide path overestimation (GPO) have occurred when a low glide path was induced by a black hole illusion (BHI) in featureless terrain during night approaches. Method: Twenty pilots flew simulated approaches under various visual cues of random terrain objects and approach lighting system (ALS) configurations. Performance was assessed relative to the desired 3° glide path in terms of precision, bias, and stability. Results: With the high-ratio (long, narrow) runway, the overall performance between 8.3 and 0.9 km from the runway depicted a concave approach shape found in BHI mishaps. The addition of random terrain objects failed to improve glide path performance, and an ALS commonly used at airports induced GPO and the resulting low glide path. The worst performance, however, resulted from a combination ALS consisting of both side and approach lights. Surprisingly, novice pilots flew more stable approaches than did experienced pilots. Conclusions: Low, unsafe approaches occur frequently in conditions with limited global and local visual cues. Approach lights lateral of the runway may counter the bias of the BHI. The variability suggested a proactive, cue-seeking behavior among experienced pilots as compared with novice pilots. Application: Visual spatial disorientation training in flight simulators should be used to demonstrate visual misperceptions in black hole environments and reduce pilots' confidence in their limited visual capabilities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52049096190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52049096190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1518/001872008X288619

DO - 10.1518/001872008X288619

M3 - Article

C2 - 18767527

AN - SCOPUS:52049096190

VL - 50

SP - 699

EP - 711

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 4

ER -