Visitors to cultural heritage attractions

An activity-based integrated typology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to broaden understanding of cultural heritage tourists through an activity based a priori segmentation approach. Data were collected from a survey conducted with 1,938 tourists visiting cultural heritage sites and events in Arizona (USA). This study suggests that tourists visiting cultural heritage attractions can be divided into two groups: 'true cultural heritage tourists' and 'spurious cultural heritage tourists.' Furthermore, true cultural tourists can be subgrouped into two types: 'tangible heritage' and 'intangible heritage' tourists. Similarly, spurious cultural heritage tourists are divided into three subgroups: 'nature,' 'sport,' and 'business' tourists. These groups are compared in terms of demographics, importance of attractions, and motivations, and it is found that these typologies are distinct. The implications for cultural tourism attraction managers and marketers are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-26
Number of pages10
JournalTourism, Culture and Communication
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

cultural heritage
Sports
typology
tourist
Managers
Industry
heritage tourism
sport
segmentation
cultural event
Attraction
Integrated
Cultural heritage
Tourists
Group
Tourism
manager

Keywords

  • Cultural heritage
  • Intangible heritage
  • Segmentation
  • Tangible heritage
  • Tourist typology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{02b243f3940d41ce9cc8a68a711fa0fd,
title = "Visitors to cultural heritage attractions: An activity-based integrated typology",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to broaden understanding of cultural heritage tourists through an activity based a priori segmentation approach. Data were collected from a survey conducted with 1,938 tourists visiting cultural heritage sites and events in Arizona (USA). This study suggests that tourists visiting cultural heritage attractions can be divided into two groups: 'true cultural heritage tourists' and 'spurious cultural heritage tourists.' Furthermore, true cultural tourists can be subgrouped into two types: 'tangible heritage' and 'intangible heritage' tourists. Similarly, spurious cultural heritage tourists are divided into three subgroups: 'nature,' 'sport,' and 'business' tourists. These groups are compared in terms of demographics, importance of attractions, and motivations, and it is found that these typologies are distinct. The implications for cultural tourism attraction managers and marketers are discussed.",
keywords = "Cultural heritage, Intangible heritage, Segmentation, Tangible heritage, Tourist typology",
author = "Gyan Nyaupane and Kathleen Andereck",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3727/109830414X14038917832824",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "17--26",
journal = "Tourism, Culture and Communication",
issn = "1098-304X",
publisher = "Cognizant Communication Corporation",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visitors to cultural heritage attractions

T2 - An activity-based integrated typology

AU - Nyaupane, Gyan

AU - Andereck, Kathleen

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The purpose of this article is to broaden understanding of cultural heritage tourists through an activity based a priori segmentation approach. Data were collected from a survey conducted with 1,938 tourists visiting cultural heritage sites and events in Arizona (USA). This study suggests that tourists visiting cultural heritage attractions can be divided into two groups: 'true cultural heritage tourists' and 'spurious cultural heritage tourists.' Furthermore, true cultural tourists can be subgrouped into two types: 'tangible heritage' and 'intangible heritage' tourists. Similarly, spurious cultural heritage tourists are divided into three subgroups: 'nature,' 'sport,' and 'business' tourists. These groups are compared in terms of demographics, importance of attractions, and motivations, and it is found that these typologies are distinct. The implications for cultural tourism attraction managers and marketers are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this article is to broaden understanding of cultural heritage tourists through an activity based a priori segmentation approach. Data were collected from a survey conducted with 1,938 tourists visiting cultural heritage sites and events in Arizona (USA). This study suggests that tourists visiting cultural heritage attractions can be divided into two groups: 'true cultural heritage tourists' and 'spurious cultural heritage tourists.' Furthermore, true cultural tourists can be subgrouped into two types: 'tangible heritage' and 'intangible heritage' tourists. Similarly, spurious cultural heritage tourists are divided into three subgroups: 'nature,' 'sport,' and 'business' tourists. These groups are compared in terms of demographics, importance of attractions, and motivations, and it is found that these typologies are distinct. The implications for cultural tourism attraction managers and marketers are discussed.

KW - Cultural heritage

KW - Intangible heritage

KW - Segmentation

KW - Tangible heritage

KW - Tourist typology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941056914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941056914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3727/109830414X14038917832824

DO - 10.3727/109830414X14038917832824

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 17

EP - 26

JO - Tourism, Culture and Communication

JF - Tourism, Culture and Communication

SN - 1098-304X

IS - 1

ER -