Viewpoint: Food insecurity among college students: A case for consistent and comparable measurement

Brenna Ellison, Meg Bruening, Daniel J. Hruschka, Cassandra J. Nikolaus, Irene van Woerden, Matthew P. Rabbitt, Sharon M. Nickols-Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A growing body of research among college students has estimated remarkably high levels of food insecurity when compared to food insecurity estimates from the general population over the past decade, with recent literature reviews reporting average prevalence rates of 33–51% compared to 9.8% among U.S. adults. Given these high rates of food insecurity, policymakers at the state- and federal-levels are considering legislation to better understand and ultimately alleviate food insecurity in the college student population. Further, the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study will soon collect national surveillance data on college student food insecurity. However, emerging research suggests that existing food insecurity measurement tools may not perform as expected when used with college students. Indeed, there is no food insecurity measure that has been validated for use with college students. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the current state of food insecurity measurement among college students and set a course for more meaningful measurement in the college-student population that produces consistent and comparable estimates of food insecurity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102031
JournalFood Policy
Volume101
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • College students
  • Food insecurity
  • Measurement
  • University students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Viewpoint: Food insecurity among college students: A case for consistent and comparable measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this