Variational basis of nonlinear flexibility methods for structural analysis of frames

Keith Hjelmstad, E. Taciroglu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There have been a number of contributions to the literature on a class of structural analysis methods referred to as nonlinear flexibility methods. These methods appear to perform very well compared to classical stiffness approaches for problems with constitutive nonlinearities. Although most of these methods appeal to variational principles, the exact variational basis of these methods has not been entirely clear. Some of them even seem not to be variationally consistent. We show in this paper that, because the equations of equilibrium and kinematics are directly integrable, a nonlinear flexibility method (in the spirit of those presented in the literature) can be derived without appeal to variational principles. The method does not involve interpolation of the displacement field and the accuracy of the method is limited only by the numerical scheme used to perform element integrals. There is no need for h refinement to improve accuracy. Further, we show that this nonlinear flexibility method is essentially identical, with some subtle algorithmic differences, to a two-field (Hellinger-Reissner) variational principle when the stress interpolation is exact (which is possible for this class of problems). We demonstrate the utility of the nonlinear flexibility method by applying it to a problem involving cyclic inelastic loading wherein the strain fields evolve into functions that are difficult to capture through interpolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1157-1169
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume131
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Structural analysis
Interpolation
Mechanics
Kinematics
Stiffness

Keywords

  • Beams
  • Finite elements
  • Frames
  • Structural analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Variational basis of nonlinear flexibility methods for structural analysis of frames. / Hjelmstad, Keith; Taciroglu, E.

In: Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 131, No. 11, 11.2005, p. 1157-1169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{afda01499b4a4336bf024c618e76207d,
title = "Variational basis of nonlinear flexibility methods for structural analysis of frames",
abstract = "There have been a number of contributions to the literature on a class of structural analysis methods referred to as nonlinear flexibility methods. These methods appear to perform very well compared to classical stiffness approaches for problems with constitutive nonlinearities. Although most of these methods appeal to variational principles, the exact variational basis of these methods has not been entirely clear. Some of them even seem not to be variationally consistent. We show in this paper that, because the equations of equilibrium and kinematics are directly integrable, a nonlinear flexibility method (in the spirit of those presented in the literature) can be derived without appeal to variational principles. The method does not involve interpolation of the displacement field and the accuracy of the method is limited only by the numerical scheme used to perform element integrals. There is no need for h refinement to improve accuracy. Further, we show that this nonlinear flexibility method is essentially identical, with some subtle algorithmic differences, to a two-field (Hellinger-Reissner) variational principle when the stress interpolation is exact (which is possible for this class of problems). We demonstrate the utility of the nonlinear flexibility method by applying it to a problem involving cyclic inelastic loading wherein the strain fields evolve into functions that are difficult to capture through interpolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics",
keywords = "Beams, Finite elements, Frames, Structural analysis",
author = "Keith Hjelmstad and E. Taciroglu",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:11(1157)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "1157--1169",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9399",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variational basis of nonlinear flexibility methods for structural analysis of frames

AU - Hjelmstad, Keith

AU - Taciroglu, E.

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - There have been a number of contributions to the literature on a class of structural analysis methods referred to as nonlinear flexibility methods. These methods appear to perform very well compared to classical stiffness approaches for problems with constitutive nonlinearities. Although most of these methods appeal to variational principles, the exact variational basis of these methods has not been entirely clear. Some of them even seem not to be variationally consistent. We show in this paper that, because the equations of equilibrium and kinematics are directly integrable, a nonlinear flexibility method (in the spirit of those presented in the literature) can be derived without appeal to variational principles. The method does not involve interpolation of the displacement field and the accuracy of the method is limited only by the numerical scheme used to perform element integrals. There is no need for h refinement to improve accuracy. Further, we show that this nonlinear flexibility method is essentially identical, with some subtle algorithmic differences, to a two-field (Hellinger-Reissner) variational principle when the stress interpolation is exact (which is possible for this class of problems). We demonstrate the utility of the nonlinear flexibility method by applying it to a problem involving cyclic inelastic loading wherein the strain fields evolve into functions that are difficult to capture through interpolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics

AB - There have been a number of contributions to the literature on a class of structural analysis methods referred to as nonlinear flexibility methods. These methods appear to perform very well compared to classical stiffness approaches for problems with constitutive nonlinearities. Although most of these methods appeal to variational principles, the exact variational basis of these methods has not been entirely clear. Some of them even seem not to be variationally consistent. We show in this paper that, because the equations of equilibrium and kinematics are directly integrable, a nonlinear flexibility method (in the spirit of those presented in the literature) can be derived without appeal to variational principles. The method does not involve interpolation of the displacement field and the accuracy of the method is limited only by the numerical scheme used to perform element integrals. There is no need for h refinement to improve accuracy. Further, we show that this nonlinear flexibility method is essentially identical, with some subtle algorithmic differences, to a two-field (Hellinger-Reissner) variational principle when the stress interpolation is exact (which is possible for this class of problems). We demonstrate the utility of the nonlinear flexibility method by applying it to a problem involving cyclic inelastic loading wherein the strain fields evolve into functions that are difficult to capture through interpolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics

KW - Beams

KW - Finite elements

KW - Frames

KW - Structural analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644548950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644548950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:11(1157)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:11(1157)

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 1157

EP - 1169

JO - Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE

JF - Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE

SN - 0733-9399

IS - 11

ER -