Variability in atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons (CCl3F and CCl2F2) near a large urban area: Implications for groundwater dating

David T. Ho, Peter Schlosser, William M. Smethie, H. James Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are frequently used as tracers for age dating of young groundwaters. However, in urban environments with many CFC point sources, uncertainties in the delivery of CFCs to groundwater (input function) complicate quantitative interpretation of observed CFC distributions. To assess the potential impact of elevated atmospheric CFC mixing ratios on CFC-based groundwater ages near a large coastal urban center, we measured atmospheric mixing ratios of CFCs in Palisades, NY, 25 km north, of New York City. We present and discuss a 16-month record of atmospheric CCl3F (CFC-11) and CCl2F2 (CFC-12) obtained from gas chromatographic analyses taken at intervals of approximately 10 min. Nearly all measured values are in excess of remote Northern Hemisphere (NH) atmospheric mixing ratios. The mean mixing ratios of CFC-11 and CFC-12 are 6 and 13% higher, respectively, than those measured at a remote NH location during the same time period. The temporal trends of CFC-11 and CFC-12 differ from those of the remote atmosphere. Diurnal, weekly, and seasonal patterns are evident in the measured CFC distributions, in addition to variations resulting from regional meteorological conditions. These observations indicate that, to effectively use CFCs as groundwater dating tools near local or regional sources, their local atmospheric input functions must be explicitly defined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2377-2382
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume32
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Variability in atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons (CCl<sub>3</sub>F and CCl<sub>2</sub>F<sub>2</sub>) near a large urban area: Implications for groundwater dating'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this