Valuing a homeland security policy: Countermeasures for the threats from shoulder mounted missiles

V. Kerry Smith, Carol Mansfield, Laurel Clayton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports estimates for the ex ante tradeoffs for three specific homeland security policies that all address a terrorist attack on commercial aircraft with shoulder mounted missiles. Our analysis focuses on the willingness to pay for anti-missile laser jamming countermeasures mounted on commercial aircraft compared with two other policies as well as the prospect of remaining with the status quo. Our findings are based a stated preference conjoint survey conducted in 2006 and administered to a sample from Knowledge Networks' national internet panel. The estimates range from 100 to 220 annually per household. Von Winterfeldt and O'Sullivan's (2006) analysis of the same laser jamming plan suggests that the countermeasures would be preferred if economic losses are above 74 billion, the probability of attack is larger than 0.37 in 10 years, and if the cost of the measures is less than about 14 billion. Our results imply that, using the most conservative of our estimates, a program with a cost consistent with their thresholds would yield significant aggregate net benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-243
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Threat
Countermeasures
Homeland security
Security policy
Laser
Aircraft
Costs
Status quo
Attack
Household
Terrorist attack
Trade-offs
Stated preference
World Wide Web
Knowledge networks
Willingness-to-pay
Economic loss

Keywords

  • Economic value of homeland security
  • Shoulder mounted missiles
  • Terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Valuing a homeland security policy : Countermeasures for the threats from shoulder mounted missiles. / Smith, V. Kerry; Mansfield, Carol; Clayton, Laurel.

In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 38, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 215-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, V. Kerry ; Mansfield, Carol ; Clayton, Laurel. / Valuing a homeland security policy : Countermeasures for the threats from shoulder mounted missiles. In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2009 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 215-243.
@article{a75579fa520d434f98ec8e96348c68cb,
title = "Valuing a homeland security policy: Countermeasures for the threats from shoulder mounted missiles",
abstract = "This paper reports estimates for the ex ante tradeoffs for three specific homeland security policies that all address a terrorist attack on commercial aircraft with shoulder mounted missiles. Our analysis focuses on the willingness to pay for anti-missile laser jamming countermeasures mounted on commercial aircraft compared with two other policies as well as the prospect of remaining with the status quo. Our findings are based a stated preference conjoint survey conducted in 2006 and administered to a sample from Knowledge Networks' national internet panel. The estimates range from 100 to 220 annually per household. Von Winterfeldt and O'Sullivan's (2006) analysis of the same laser jamming plan suggests that the countermeasures would be preferred if economic losses are above 74 billion, the probability of attack is larger than 0.37 in 10 years, and if the cost of the measures is less than about 14 billion. Our results imply that, using the most conservative of our estimates, a program with a cost consistent with their thresholds would yield significant aggregate net benefits.",
keywords = "Economic value of homeland security, Shoulder mounted missiles, Terrorism",
author = "Smith, {V. Kerry} and Carol Mansfield and Laurel Clayton",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11166-009-9069-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "215--243",
journal = "Journal of Risk and Uncertainty",
issn = "0895-5646",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing a homeland security policy

T2 - Countermeasures for the threats from shoulder mounted missiles

AU - Smith, V. Kerry

AU - Mansfield, Carol

AU - Clayton, Laurel

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - This paper reports estimates for the ex ante tradeoffs for three specific homeland security policies that all address a terrorist attack on commercial aircraft with shoulder mounted missiles. Our analysis focuses on the willingness to pay for anti-missile laser jamming countermeasures mounted on commercial aircraft compared with two other policies as well as the prospect of remaining with the status quo. Our findings are based a stated preference conjoint survey conducted in 2006 and administered to a sample from Knowledge Networks' national internet panel. The estimates range from 100 to 220 annually per household. Von Winterfeldt and O'Sullivan's (2006) analysis of the same laser jamming plan suggests that the countermeasures would be preferred if economic losses are above 74 billion, the probability of attack is larger than 0.37 in 10 years, and if the cost of the measures is less than about 14 billion. Our results imply that, using the most conservative of our estimates, a program with a cost consistent with their thresholds would yield significant aggregate net benefits.

AB - This paper reports estimates for the ex ante tradeoffs for three specific homeland security policies that all address a terrorist attack on commercial aircraft with shoulder mounted missiles. Our analysis focuses on the willingness to pay for anti-missile laser jamming countermeasures mounted on commercial aircraft compared with two other policies as well as the prospect of remaining with the status quo. Our findings are based a stated preference conjoint survey conducted in 2006 and administered to a sample from Knowledge Networks' national internet panel. The estimates range from 100 to 220 annually per household. Von Winterfeldt and O'Sullivan's (2006) analysis of the same laser jamming plan suggests that the countermeasures would be preferred if economic losses are above 74 billion, the probability of attack is larger than 0.37 in 10 years, and if the cost of the measures is less than about 14 billion. Our results imply that, using the most conservative of our estimates, a program with a cost consistent with their thresholds would yield significant aggregate net benefits.

KW - Economic value of homeland security

KW - Shoulder mounted missiles

KW - Terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349124744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349124744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11166-009-9069-x

DO - 10.1007/s11166-009-9069-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67349124744

VL - 38

SP - 215

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

JF - Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

SN - 0895-5646

IS - 3

ER -