Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability: Commonsense Assumptions

Audrey Beardsley, Jessica Holloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the concerns regarding value-added models (VAMs), advocates hold strong to VAMs’ theoretical strengths and potentials, while adopting a set of agreed-upon albeit “heroic” set of assumptions, without research in support. These assumptions transcend promotional, policy, media, and research-based pieces, but they have never been made explicit as analyzed as a set or whole. The purpose of this study was to make unambiguous the assumptions that have been made within the VAM narrative that have often been accepted without challenge, and situate these assumptions within the research. Sources for analyses included 470 pieces, published within traditional and nontraditional outlets, from which we derived 27 prevailing assumptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)516-542
Number of pages27
JournalEducational Policy
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

value added
responsibility
teacher
evaluation
media policy
research policy
narrative

Keywords

  • educational measurement
  • educational reform
  • teacher accountability
  • teacher evaluation
  • validity
  • value-added models (VAMs)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability : Commonsense Assumptions. / Beardsley, Audrey; Holloway, Jessica.

In: Educational Policy, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 516-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4f9018a4f8b432f9ff6f55669f65d30,
title = "Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability: Commonsense Assumptions",
abstract = "Despite the concerns regarding value-added models (VAMs), advocates hold strong to VAMs’ theoretical strengths and potentials, while adopting a set of agreed-upon albeit “heroic” set of assumptions, without research in support. These assumptions transcend promotional, policy, media, and research-based pieces, but they have never been made explicit as analyzed as a set or whole. The purpose of this study was to make unambiguous the assumptions that have been made within the VAM narrative that have often been accepted without challenge, and situate these assumptions within the research. Sources for analyses included 470 pieces, published within traditional and nontraditional outlets, from which we derived 27 prevailing assumptions.",
keywords = "educational measurement, educational reform, teacher accountability, teacher evaluation, validity, value-added models (VAMs)",
author = "Audrey Beardsley and Jessica Holloway",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0895904817719519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "516--542",
journal = "Educational Policy",
issn = "0895-9048",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability

T2 - Commonsense Assumptions

AU - Beardsley, Audrey

AU - Holloway, Jessica

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Despite the concerns regarding value-added models (VAMs), advocates hold strong to VAMs’ theoretical strengths and potentials, while adopting a set of agreed-upon albeit “heroic” set of assumptions, without research in support. These assumptions transcend promotional, policy, media, and research-based pieces, but they have never been made explicit as analyzed as a set or whole. The purpose of this study was to make unambiguous the assumptions that have been made within the VAM narrative that have often been accepted without challenge, and situate these assumptions within the research. Sources for analyses included 470 pieces, published within traditional and nontraditional outlets, from which we derived 27 prevailing assumptions.

AB - Despite the concerns regarding value-added models (VAMs), advocates hold strong to VAMs’ theoretical strengths and potentials, while adopting a set of agreed-upon albeit “heroic” set of assumptions, without research in support. These assumptions transcend promotional, policy, media, and research-based pieces, but they have never been made explicit as analyzed as a set or whole. The purpose of this study was to make unambiguous the assumptions that have been made within the VAM narrative that have often been accepted without challenge, and situate these assumptions within the research. Sources for analyses included 470 pieces, published within traditional and nontraditional outlets, from which we derived 27 prevailing assumptions.

KW - educational measurement

KW - educational reform

KW - teacher accountability

KW - teacher evaluation

KW - validity

KW - value-added models (VAMs)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063948916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063948916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0895904817719519

DO - 10.1177/0895904817719519

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 516

EP - 542

JO - Educational Policy

JF - Educational Policy

SN - 0895-9048

IS - 3

ER -