Validity of SenseWear® Armband v5.2 and v2.2 for estimating energy expenditure

Dharini M. Bhammar, Brandon J. Sawyer, Wesley J. Tucker, Jung Min Lee, Glenn Gaesser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared SenseWear Armband versions (v) 2.2 and 5.2 for estimating energy expenditure in healthy adults. Thirty-four adults (26 women), 30.1 ± 8.7 years old, performed two trials that included light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities: (1) structured routine: seven activities performed for 8-min each, with 4-min of rest between activities; (2) semi-structured routine: 12 activities performed for 5-min each, with no rest between activities. Energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry and predicted using SenseWear v2.2 and v5.2. Compared to indirect calorimetry (297.8 ± 54.2 kcal), the total energy expenditure was overestimated (P 

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 8 2016

Fingerprint

Energy Metabolism
Indirect Calorimetry
Light

Keywords

  • accelerometer
  • Activity monitor
  • assessment
  • calorimetry
  • physical activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Validity of SenseWear® Armband v5.2 and v2.2 for estimating energy expenditure. / Bhammar, Dharini M.; Sawyer, Brandon J.; Tucker, Wesley J.; Lee, Jung Min; Gaesser, Glenn.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, 08.02.2016, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bhammar, Dharini M. ; Sawyer, Brandon J. ; Tucker, Wesley J. ; Lee, Jung Min ; Gaesser, Glenn. / Validity of SenseWear® Armband v5.2 and v2.2 for estimating energy expenditure. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2016 ; pp. 1-9.
@article{19fa3e19531e446da433ae0d1a3f127a,
title = "Validity of SenseWear{\circledR} Armband v5.2 and v2.2 for estimating energy expenditure",
abstract = "We compared SenseWear Armband versions (v) 2.2 and 5.2 for estimating energy expenditure in healthy adults. Thirty-four adults (26 women), 30.1 ± 8.7 years old, performed two trials that included light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities: (1) structured routine: seven activities performed for 8-min each, with 4-min of rest between activities; (2) semi-structured routine: 12 activities performed for 5-min each, with no rest between activities. Energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry and predicted using SenseWear v2.2 and v5.2. Compared to indirect calorimetry (297.8 ± 54.2 kcal), the total energy expenditure was overestimated (P ",
keywords = "accelerometer, Activity monitor, assessment, calorimetry, physical activity",
author = "Bhammar, {Dharini M.} and Sawyer, {Brandon J.} and Tucker, {Wesley J.} and Lee, {Jung Min} and Glenn Gaesser",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2016.1140220",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of SenseWear® Armband v5.2 and v2.2 for estimating energy expenditure

AU - Bhammar, Dharini M.

AU - Sawyer, Brandon J.

AU - Tucker, Wesley J.

AU - Lee, Jung Min

AU - Gaesser, Glenn

PY - 2016/2/8

Y1 - 2016/2/8

N2 - We compared SenseWear Armband versions (v) 2.2 and 5.2 for estimating energy expenditure in healthy adults. Thirty-four adults (26 women), 30.1 ± 8.7 years old, performed two trials that included light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities: (1) structured routine: seven activities performed for 8-min each, with 4-min of rest between activities; (2) semi-structured routine: 12 activities performed for 5-min each, with no rest between activities. Energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry and predicted using SenseWear v2.2 and v5.2. Compared to indirect calorimetry (297.8 ± 54.2 kcal), the total energy expenditure was overestimated (P 

AB - We compared SenseWear Armband versions (v) 2.2 and 5.2 for estimating energy expenditure in healthy adults. Thirty-four adults (26 women), 30.1 ± 8.7 years old, performed two trials that included light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities: (1) structured routine: seven activities performed for 8-min each, with 4-min of rest between activities; (2) semi-structured routine: 12 activities performed for 5-min each, with no rest between activities. Energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry and predicted using SenseWear v2.2 and v5.2. Compared to indirect calorimetry (297.8 ± 54.2 kcal), the total energy expenditure was overestimated (P 

KW - accelerometer

KW - Activity monitor

KW - assessment

KW - calorimetry

KW - physical activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958037432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958037432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1140220

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1140220

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

ER -