Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis

Paul A. Mabe, Stephen West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

581 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviews 55 studies in which self-evaluations of ability were compared with measures of performance to show a low mean validity coefficient (mean r = .29) with high variability (SD = .25). A meta-analysis by the procedures of J. E. Hunter et al (1982) calculated sample-size weighted estimates of - r and SDr and estimated the appropriate adjustments of these values for sampling error and unreliability. Among person variables, high intelligence, high achievement status, and internal locus of control were associated with more accurate evaluations. Much of the variability in the validity coefficients (R = .64) could be accounted for by 9 specific conditions of measurement, notably (a) the rater's expectation that the self-evaluation would be compared with criterion measures, (b) the rater's previous experience with self-evaluation, (c) instructions guaranteeing anonymity of the self-evaluation, and (d) self-evaluation instructions emphasizing comparison with others. It is hypothesized that conditions increasing self-awareness would increase the validity of self-evaluation. (84 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-296
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Aptitude
Meta-Analysis
Social Adjustment
Internal-External Control
Selection Bias
Intelligence
Sample Size

Keywords

  • validity of self evaluation of ability, literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Validity of self-evaluation of ability : A review and meta-analysis. / Mabe, Paul A.; West, Stephen.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 3, 06.1982, p. 280-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d55b2c6e84d0482fb0c747969c6938d6,
title = "Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Reviews 55 studies in which self-evaluations of ability were compared with measures of performance to show a low mean validity coefficient (mean r = .29) with high variability (SD = .25). A meta-analysis by the procedures of J. E. Hunter et al (1982) calculated sample-size weighted estimates of - r and SDr and estimated the appropriate adjustments of these values for sampling error and unreliability. Among person variables, high intelligence, high achievement status, and internal locus of control were associated with more accurate evaluations. Much of the variability in the validity coefficients (R = .64) could be accounted for by 9 specific conditions of measurement, notably (a) the rater's expectation that the self-evaluation would be compared with criterion measures, (b) the rater's previous experience with self-evaluation, (c) instructions guaranteeing anonymity of the self-evaluation, and (d) self-evaluation instructions emphasizing comparison with others. It is hypothesized that conditions increasing self-awareness would increase the validity of self-evaluation. (84 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "validity of self evaluation of ability, literature review",
author = "Mabe, {Paul A.} and Stephen West",
year = "1982",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "280--296",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of self-evaluation of ability

T2 - A review and meta-analysis

AU - Mabe, Paul A.

AU - West, Stephen

PY - 1982/6

Y1 - 1982/6

N2 - Reviews 55 studies in which self-evaluations of ability were compared with measures of performance to show a low mean validity coefficient (mean r = .29) with high variability (SD = .25). A meta-analysis by the procedures of J. E. Hunter et al (1982) calculated sample-size weighted estimates of - r and SDr and estimated the appropriate adjustments of these values for sampling error and unreliability. Among person variables, high intelligence, high achievement status, and internal locus of control were associated with more accurate evaluations. Much of the variability in the validity coefficients (R = .64) could be accounted for by 9 specific conditions of measurement, notably (a) the rater's expectation that the self-evaluation would be compared with criterion measures, (b) the rater's previous experience with self-evaluation, (c) instructions guaranteeing anonymity of the self-evaluation, and (d) self-evaluation instructions emphasizing comparison with others. It is hypothesized that conditions increasing self-awareness would increase the validity of self-evaluation. (84 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Reviews 55 studies in which self-evaluations of ability were compared with measures of performance to show a low mean validity coefficient (mean r = .29) with high variability (SD = .25). A meta-analysis by the procedures of J. E. Hunter et al (1982) calculated sample-size weighted estimates of - r and SDr and estimated the appropriate adjustments of these values for sampling error and unreliability. Among person variables, high intelligence, high achievement status, and internal locus of control were associated with more accurate evaluations. Much of the variability in the validity coefficients (R = .64) could be accounted for by 9 specific conditions of measurement, notably (a) the rater's expectation that the self-evaluation would be compared with criterion measures, (b) the rater's previous experience with self-evaluation, (c) instructions guaranteeing anonymity of the self-evaluation, and (d) self-evaluation instructions emphasizing comparison with others. It is hypothesized that conditions increasing self-awareness would increase the validity of self-evaluation. (84 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - validity of self evaluation of ability, literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248452761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248452761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248452761

VL - 67

SP - 280

EP - 296

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 3

ER -