Validation of a method to assess ADHD-related impulsivity in animal models

Elizabeth Watterson, Gabriel J. Mazur, Federico Sanabria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Response inhibition capacity (RIC), the ability to withhold instrumentally reinforced responses, is compromised in ADHD. Most standard methods for assessing RIC in rodents potentially confound motivational, motor, learning, and inhibitory processes, lack sensitivity to pharmacological treatment, and have unknown reliability. New method: The fixed minimum interval (FMI) schedule of reinforcement and its associated analytical techniques are designed to dissociate inhibitory processes from incentive-motivational and timing processes. This study is aimed at validating the FMI as a method for assessing RIC in animal models. FMI performance was compared across different withholding requirements (0.5, 3, 6 and 21. s), deprivation levels, reinforcement rates, and reinforcer magnitudes. Results and comparison with existing methods: Motivational manipulations differentially affected estimates of incentive motivation but not the FMI-derived index of RIC, θ. Changes in the withholding requirement influenced timed IRTs in a manner consistent with extant timing theories. Individual estimates of RIC were resilient to prolonged changes in motivation but not to changes in FMI schedule. Results indicate that the FMI schedule is not vulnerable to the same limitations associated with existing methods for assessing RIC. Conclusions: These results support the use of the FMI schedule and associated analytic techniques as tools for assessing RIC in animal models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-47
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume252
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2014

Fingerprint

Impulsive Behavior
Animal Models
Motivation
Appointments and Schedules
Reinforcement Schedule
Aptitude
Inhibition (Psychology)
Rodentia
Learning
Pharmacology

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • Fixed minimum interval schedule
  • Impulsivity
  • Incentive motivation
  • Response inhibition capacity
  • Temporal Regulation model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Validation of a method to assess ADHD-related impulsivity in animal models. / Watterson, Elizabeth; Mazur, Gabriel J.; Sanabria, Federico.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 252, 03.09.2014, p. 36-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e74b50ebbb704e0780f2ceedf101937d,
title = "Validation of a method to assess ADHD-related impulsivity in animal models",
abstract = "Background: Response inhibition capacity (RIC), the ability to withhold instrumentally reinforced responses, is compromised in ADHD. Most standard methods for assessing RIC in rodents potentially confound motivational, motor, learning, and inhibitory processes, lack sensitivity to pharmacological treatment, and have unknown reliability. New method: The fixed minimum interval (FMI) schedule of reinforcement and its associated analytical techniques are designed to dissociate inhibitory processes from incentive-motivational and timing processes. This study is aimed at validating the FMI as a method for assessing RIC in animal models. FMI performance was compared across different withholding requirements (0.5, 3, 6 and 21. s), deprivation levels, reinforcement rates, and reinforcer magnitudes. Results and comparison with existing methods: Motivational manipulations differentially affected estimates of incentive motivation but not the FMI-derived index of RIC, θ. Changes in the withholding requirement influenced timed IRTs in a manner consistent with extant timing theories. Individual estimates of RIC were resilient to prolonged changes in motivation but not to changes in FMI schedule. Results indicate that the FMI schedule is not vulnerable to the same limitations associated with existing methods for assessing RIC. Conclusions: These results support the use of the FMI schedule and associated analytic techniques as tools for assessing RIC in animal models.",
keywords = "ADHD, Fixed minimum interval schedule, Impulsivity, Incentive motivation, Response inhibition capacity, Temporal Regulation model",
author = "Elizabeth Watterson and Mazur, {Gabriel J.} and Federico Sanabria",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "252",
pages = "36--47",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a method to assess ADHD-related impulsivity in animal models

AU - Watterson, Elizabeth

AU - Mazur, Gabriel J.

AU - Sanabria, Federico

PY - 2014/9/3

Y1 - 2014/9/3

N2 - Background: Response inhibition capacity (RIC), the ability to withhold instrumentally reinforced responses, is compromised in ADHD. Most standard methods for assessing RIC in rodents potentially confound motivational, motor, learning, and inhibitory processes, lack sensitivity to pharmacological treatment, and have unknown reliability. New method: The fixed minimum interval (FMI) schedule of reinforcement and its associated analytical techniques are designed to dissociate inhibitory processes from incentive-motivational and timing processes. This study is aimed at validating the FMI as a method for assessing RIC in animal models. FMI performance was compared across different withholding requirements (0.5, 3, 6 and 21. s), deprivation levels, reinforcement rates, and reinforcer magnitudes. Results and comparison with existing methods: Motivational manipulations differentially affected estimates of incentive motivation but not the FMI-derived index of RIC, θ. Changes in the withholding requirement influenced timed IRTs in a manner consistent with extant timing theories. Individual estimates of RIC were resilient to prolonged changes in motivation but not to changes in FMI schedule. Results indicate that the FMI schedule is not vulnerable to the same limitations associated with existing methods for assessing RIC. Conclusions: These results support the use of the FMI schedule and associated analytic techniques as tools for assessing RIC in animal models.

AB - Background: Response inhibition capacity (RIC), the ability to withhold instrumentally reinforced responses, is compromised in ADHD. Most standard methods for assessing RIC in rodents potentially confound motivational, motor, learning, and inhibitory processes, lack sensitivity to pharmacological treatment, and have unknown reliability. New method: The fixed minimum interval (FMI) schedule of reinforcement and its associated analytical techniques are designed to dissociate inhibitory processes from incentive-motivational and timing processes. This study is aimed at validating the FMI as a method for assessing RIC in animal models. FMI performance was compared across different withholding requirements (0.5, 3, 6 and 21. s), deprivation levels, reinforcement rates, and reinforcer magnitudes. Results and comparison with existing methods: Motivational manipulations differentially affected estimates of incentive motivation but not the FMI-derived index of RIC, θ. Changes in the withholding requirement influenced timed IRTs in a manner consistent with extant timing theories. Individual estimates of RIC were resilient to prolonged changes in motivation but not to changes in FMI schedule. Results indicate that the FMI schedule is not vulnerable to the same limitations associated with existing methods for assessing RIC. Conclusions: These results support the use of the FMI schedule and associated analytic techniques as tools for assessing RIC in animal models.

KW - ADHD

KW - Fixed minimum interval schedule

KW - Impulsivity

KW - Incentive motivation

KW - Response inhibition capacity

KW - Temporal Regulation model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953638220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953638220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.020

M3 - Article

VL - 252

SP - 36

EP - 47

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

ER -