TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of a brief screening tool for medication-related problems
AU - Snyder, Margie E.
AU - Pater, Karen S.
AU - Frail, Caitlin K.
AU - Hudmon, Karen Suchanek
AU - Doebbeling, Brad N.
AU - Smith, Randall B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Background: Medication therapy management (MTM) services position pharmacists to prevent, detect, and resolve medication-related problems (MRPs.) However, selecting patients for MTM who are most at risk for MRPs is a challenge. Using self-administered scales that are practical for use in clinical practice are one approach. Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the psychometric properties of a brief self-administered scale as a screening tool for MRPs. Methods: This was a non-randomized study utilizing questionnaires administered cross-sectionally. In Phase 1, patients (n=394) at community pharmacies and outpatient clinics completed 78 items, provided to the study team by item authors, assessing perceived MRPs. These data were used to select items for further investigation as a brief, self-administered scale, and estimate the reliability and construct validity of the resulting instrument. In Phase 2, a convenience sample of patients (n=200) at community pharmacies completed a nine-item, self-administered scale. After completion, they were engaged in a comprehensive medication review by their pharmacist who was blinded to questionnaire responses. The main outcome measure for estimating the criterion-related validity of the scale was the number of pharmacist-identified medication-related problems (MRPs.) Item statistics were computed as well as bivariate associations between scale scores and other variables with MRPs. A multivariate model was constructed to examine the influence of scale scores on MRPs after controlling for other significant variables. Results: Higher scores on the questionnaire were positively correlated with more pharmacist-identified MRPs (r=0.24; P=0.001) and scores remained as a significant predictor (P=0.031) when controlling for other relevant variables in a multivariate regression model (R2=0.21; P<0.001). Conclusions: Patient responses on the scale may have a modest role in predicting MRPs. The use of self-administered questionnaires such as this may supplement other available patient data in developing patient eligibility criteria for MTM, however, additional research is warranted.
AB - Background: Medication therapy management (MTM) services position pharmacists to prevent, detect, and resolve medication-related problems (MRPs.) However, selecting patients for MTM who are most at risk for MRPs is a challenge. Using self-administered scales that are practical for use in clinical practice are one approach. Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the psychometric properties of a brief self-administered scale as a screening tool for MRPs. Methods: This was a non-randomized study utilizing questionnaires administered cross-sectionally. In Phase 1, patients (n=394) at community pharmacies and outpatient clinics completed 78 items, provided to the study team by item authors, assessing perceived MRPs. These data were used to select items for further investigation as a brief, self-administered scale, and estimate the reliability and construct validity of the resulting instrument. In Phase 2, a convenience sample of patients (n=200) at community pharmacies completed a nine-item, self-administered scale. After completion, they were engaged in a comprehensive medication review by their pharmacist who was blinded to questionnaire responses. The main outcome measure for estimating the criterion-related validity of the scale was the number of pharmacist-identified medication-related problems (MRPs.) Item statistics were computed as well as bivariate associations between scale scores and other variables with MRPs. A multivariate model was constructed to examine the influence of scale scores on MRPs after controlling for other significant variables. Results: Higher scores on the questionnaire were positively correlated with more pharmacist-identified MRPs (r=0.24; P=0.001) and scores remained as a significant predictor (P=0.031) when controlling for other relevant variables in a multivariate regression model (R2=0.21; P<0.001). Conclusions: Patient responses on the scale may have a modest role in predicting MRPs. The use of self-administered questionnaires such as this may supplement other available patient data in developing patient eligibility criteria for MTM, however, additional research is warranted.
KW - Administration
KW - Medication therapy management
KW - Outcomes
KW - Pharmaceutical care
KW - Pharmacy practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922434657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922434657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 25443640
AN - SCOPUS:84922434657
SN - 1551-7411
VL - 11
SP - 253
EP - 264
JO - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
JF - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
IS - 2
ER -