Abstract

Collaboration is central to modern scientific inquiry, and increasingly important to the professional experiences of academic scientists. While the effects of collaboration have been widely studied, much less is understood about the motivations to collaborate and collaboration dynamics that generate scientific outcomes. A particular interest of this study is to understand how collaboration experiences differ between women and men, and the attributions used to explain these differences. We use a multi-method study of university Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics faculty research collaborators. We employ 177 anonymous open-ended responses to a web-based survey, and 60 semi-structured interviews of academic scientists in US research universities. We find similarities and differences in collaborative activity between men and women. Open-ended qualitative textual analysis suggests that some of these differences are attributed to power dynamics – both general ones related to differences in organizational status, and in power dynamics related specifically to gender. In analysis of semi-structured interviews, we find that both status and gender were used as interpretive frames for collaborative behavior, with more emphasis placed on status than gender differences. Overall, the findings support that gender structures some part of the collaborative experience, but that status hierarchy exerts more clear effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-558
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

gender
professional experience
university
interview
attribution
gender-specific factors
experience
mathematics
engineering
Research Collaboration
science
World Wide Web
Collaborators
Textual Analysis
Gender Differences
Attribution
Scientific Inquiry
Mathematics
Research Universities

Keywords

  • Academic rank
  • Gender
  • Scientific collaboration
  • STEM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics. / Gaughan, Monica; Bozeman, Barry.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2016, p. 536-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fdfe0e28af94ebe8fec5a2393fb6efb,
title = "Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics",
abstract = "Collaboration is central to modern scientific inquiry, and increasingly important to the professional experiences of academic scientists. While the effects of collaboration have been widely studied, much less is understood about the motivations to collaborate and collaboration dynamics that generate scientific outcomes. A particular interest of this study is to understand how collaboration experiences differ between women and men, and the attributions used to explain these differences. We use a multi-method study of university Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics faculty research collaborators. We employ 177 anonymous open-ended responses to a web-based survey, and 60 semi-structured interviews of academic scientists in US research universities. We find similarities and differences in collaborative activity between men and women. Open-ended qualitative textual analysis suggests that some of these differences are attributed to power dynamics – both general ones related to differences in organizational status, and in power dynamics related specifically to gender. In analysis of semi-structured interviews, we find that both status and gender were used as interpretive frames for collaborative behavior, with more emphasis placed on status than gender differences. Overall, the findings support that gender structures some part of the collaborative experience, but that status hierarchy exerts more clear effects.",
keywords = "Academic rank, Gender, Scientific collaboration, STEM",
author = "Monica Gaughan and Barry Bozeman",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0306312716652249",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "536--558",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics

AU - Gaughan, Monica

AU - Bozeman, Barry

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Collaboration is central to modern scientific inquiry, and increasingly important to the professional experiences of academic scientists. While the effects of collaboration have been widely studied, much less is understood about the motivations to collaborate and collaboration dynamics that generate scientific outcomes. A particular interest of this study is to understand how collaboration experiences differ between women and men, and the attributions used to explain these differences. We use a multi-method study of university Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics faculty research collaborators. We employ 177 anonymous open-ended responses to a web-based survey, and 60 semi-structured interviews of academic scientists in US research universities. We find similarities and differences in collaborative activity between men and women. Open-ended qualitative textual analysis suggests that some of these differences are attributed to power dynamics – both general ones related to differences in organizational status, and in power dynamics related specifically to gender. In analysis of semi-structured interviews, we find that both status and gender were used as interpretive frames for collaborative behavior, with more emphasis placed on status than gender differences. Overall, the findings support that gender structures some part of the collaborative experience, but that status hierarchy exerts more clear effects.

AB - Collaboration is central to modern scientific inquiry, and increasingly important to the professional experiences of academic scientists. While the effects of collaboration have been widely studied, much less is understood about the motivations to collaborate and collaboration dynamics that generate scientific outcomes. A particular interest of this study is to understand how collaboration experiences differ between women and men, and the attributions used to explain these differences. We use a multi-method study of university Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics faculty research collaborators. We employ 177 anonymous open-ended responses to a web-based survey, and 60 semi-structured interviews of academic scientists in US research universities. We find similarities and differences in collaborative activity between men and women. Open-ended qualitative textual analysis suggests that some of these differences are attributed to power dynamics – both general ones related to differences in organizational status, and in power dynamics related specifically to gender. In analysis of semi-structured interviews, we find that both status and gender were used as interpretive frames for collaborative behavior, with more emphasis placed on status than gender differences. Overall, the findings support that gender structures some part of the collaborative experience, but that status hierarchy exerts more clear effects.

KW - Academic rank

KW - Gender

KW - Scientific collaboration

KW - STEM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986880480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986880480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312716652249

DO - 10.1177/0306312716652249

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 536

EP - 558

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 4

ER -