TY - JOUR
T1 - Using students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource to develop knowledge in argumentation
AU - Chen, Ying Chih
AU - Qiao, Xue
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - This longitudinal case study explores how students’ epistemic uncertainty in argumentation can be adapted as a resource to develop knowledge in a fifth-grade classroom. Major data sources include 12 videotaped whole-class discussions focused on group presentation of arguments to obtain peers’ critiques across two course units, the ecosystem and the human body systems, over a 16-week period. Grounded in a qualitative, interpretative approach, the results show that when students' epistemic uncertainty was leveraged as a resource, students were able to construct a more coherent and consistent knowledge system by integrating their prior and target scientific knowledge. We argue that to effectively use students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource in managing uncertainty, teachers need to consider the status of students’ knowledge of the target concept, if they are aware of uncertainty, and how uncertainty is resolved through critique that leads to knowledge construction. As students had opportunities to practice managing uncertainty, they developed skills necessary to attend to each other’s utterances and use them as collaborative epistemic resources to develop, with their peers, acceptable knowledge. Conceptualising argumentation as an enterprise to manage uncertainty can help instructors to design a productive and authentic environment to facilitate the learning of science.
AB - This longitudinal case study explores how students’ epistemic uncertainty in argumentation can be adapted as a resource to develop knowledge in a fifth-grade classroom. Major data sources include 12 videotaped whole-class discussions focused on group presentation of arguments to obtain peers’ critiques across two course units, the ecosystem and the human body systems, over a 16-week period. Grounded in a qualitative, interpretative approach, the results show that when students' epistemic uncertainty was leveraged as a resource, students were able to construct a more coherent and consistent knowledge system by integrating their prior and target scientific knowledge. We argue that to effectively use students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource in managing uncertainty, teachers need to consider the status of students’ knowledge of the target concept, if they are aware of uncertainty, and how uncertainty is resolved through critique that leads to knowledge construction. As students had opportunities to practice managing uncertainty, they developed skills necessary to attend to each other’s utterances and use them as collaborative epistemic resources to develop, with their peers, acceptable knowledge. Conceptualising argumentation as an enterprise to manage uncertainty can help instructors to design a productive and authentic environment to facilitate the learning of science.
KW - Uncertainty management
KW - dialogue
KW - epistemic knowledge
KW - epistemic uncertainty
KW - knowledge development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090302249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090302249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2020.1813349
DO - 10.1080/09500693.2020.1813349
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090302249
SN - 0950-0693
VL - 42
SP - 2145
EP - 2180
JO - International Journal of Science Education
JF - International Journal of Science Education
IS - 13
ER -