TY - JOUR
T1 - Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond
AU - Hout, Michael C.
AU - Godwin, Hayward J.
AU - Fitzsimmons, Gemma
AU - Robbins, Arryn
AU - Menneer, Tamaryn
AU - Goldinger, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
H. G. and T. M. were supported by funding from the Economic and Social Sciences Research Council (grant ref. ES/I032398/1). SDG was supported by NIH / NICHD grant R01 HD075800-02. The authors would like to thank Greg Zelinsky, Justin Maxfield, and Carrick Williams for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Visual search is one of the most widely studied topics in vision science, both as an independent topic of interest, and as a tool for studying attention and visual cognition. A wide literature exists that seeks to understand how people find things under varying conditions of difficulty and complexity, and in situations ranging from the mundane (e.g., looking for one’s keys) to those with significant societal importance (e.g., baggage or medical screening). A primary determinant of the ease and probability of success during search are the similarity relationships that exist in the search environment, such as the similarity between the background and the target, or the likeness of the non-targets to one another. A sense of similarity is often intuitive, but it is seldom quantified directly. This presents a problem in that similarity relationships are imprecisely specified, limiting the capacity of the researcher to examine adequately their influence. In this article, we present a novel approach to overcoming this problem that combines multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analyses with behavioral and eye-tracking measurements. We propose a method whereby MDS can be repurposed to successfully quantify the similarity of experimental stimuli, thereby opening up theoretical questions in visual search and attention that cannot currently be addressed. These quantifications, in conjunction with behavioral and oculomotor measures, allow for critical observations about how similarity affects performance, information selection, and information processing. We provide a demonstration and tutorial of the approach, identify documented examples of its use, discuss how complementary computer vision methods could also be adopted, and close with a discussion of potential avenues for future application of this technique.
AB - Visual search is one of the most widely studied topics in vision science, both as an independent topic of interest, and as a tool for studying attention and visual cognition. A wide literature exists that seeks to understand how people find things under varying conditions of difficulty and complexity, and in situations ranging from the mundane (e.g., looking for one’s keys) to those with significant societal importance (e.g., baggage or medical screening). A primary determinant of the ease and probability of success during search are the similarity relationships that exist in the search environment, such as the similarity between the background and the target, or the likeness of the non-targets to one another. A sense of similarity is often intuitive, but it is seldom quantified directly. This presents a problem in that similarity relationships are imprecisely specified, limiting the capacity of the researcher to examine adequately their influence. In this article, we present a novel approach to overcoming this problem that combines multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analyses with behavioral and eye-tracking measurements. We propose a method whereby MDS can be repurposed to successfully quantify the similarity of experimental stimuli, thereby opening up theoretical questions in visual search and attention that cannot currently be addressed. These quantifications, in conjunction with behavioral and oculomotor measures, allow for critical observations about how similarity affects performance, information selection, and information processing. We provide a demonstration and tutorial of the approach, identify documented examples of its use, discuss how complementary computer vision methods could also be adopted, and close with a discussion of potential avenues for future application of this technique.
KW - Eye-movements
KW - Methods
KW - Multi-dimensional scaling
KW - Similarity
KW - Visual search
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953638645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953638645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13414-015-1010-6
DO - 10.3758/s13414-015-1010-6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26494381
AN - SCOPUS:84953638645
SN - 1943-3921
VL - 78
SP - 3
EP - 20
JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
IS - 1
ER -