Abstract

Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that people do cooperate in commons dilemmas. There are alternative theories that are proposed to explain the data. We will use agent-based models to compare alternative behavioral theories on a series of experimental data of irrigation games. The irrigation dilemma captures situations of asymmetric access to common resources while contributions of all participants are needed to maintain the physical infrastructure.In our model analysis we compare various alternative theories, including naïve simple ones like selfish rational actors and altruistic actors. We contrast these with various alternative behavioral models for collective action as well as inclusion of other-regarding preferences. The systematic comparison of alternative models on experimental data from 44 groups enables us to test which behavioral theories best explain the observed effects of communication. We do not find that one theory clearly outperform others in explaining the data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)106-115
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume46
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • Agent-based models
  • Calibration
  • Common pool resources
  • Experimental data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Using agent-based models to compare behavioral theories on experimental data : Application for irrigation games. / Janssen, Marcus; Baggio, Jacopo A.

In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 46, 01.06.2016, p. 106-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{651e437966c94bd18244efa93fc61c75,
title = "Using agent-based models to compare behavioral theories on experimental data: Application for irrigation games",
abstract = "Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that people do cooperate in commons dilemmas. There are alternative theories that are proposed to explain the data. We will use agent-based models to compare alternative behavioral theories on a series of experimental data of irrigation games. The irrigation dilemma captures situations of asymmetric access to common resources while contributions of all participants are needed to maintain the physical infrastructure.In our model analysis we compare various alternative theories, including na{\"i}ve simple ones like selfish rational actors and altruistic actors. We contrast these with various alternative behavioral models for collective action as well as inclusion of other-regarding preferences. The systematic comparison of alternative models on experimental data from 44 groups enables us to test which behavioral theories best explain the observed effects of communication. We do not find that one theory clearly outperform others in explaining the data.",
keywords = "Agent-based models, Calibration, Common pool resources, Experimental data",
author = "Marcus Janssen and Baggio, {Jacopo A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "106--115",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4944",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using agent-based models to compare behavioral theories on experimental data

T2 - Application for irrigation games

AU - Janssen, Marcus

AU - Baggio, Jacopo A.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that people do cooperate in commons dilemmas. There are alternative theories that are proposed to explain the data. We will use agent-based models to compare alternative behavioral theories on a series of experimental data of irrigation games. The irrigation dilemma captures situations of asymmetric access to common resources while contributions of all participants are needed to maintain the physical infrastructure.In our model analysis we compare various alternative theories, including naïve simple ones like selfish rational actors and altruistic actors. We contrast these with various alternative behavioral models for collective action as well as inclusion of other-regarding preferences. The systematic comparison of alternative models on experimental data from 44 groups enables us to test which behavioral theories best explain the observed effects of communication. We do not find that one theory clearly outperform others in explaining the data.

AB - Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that people do cooperate in commons dilemmas. There are alternative theories that are proposed to explain the data. We will use agent-based models to compare alternative behavioral theories on a series of experimental data of irrigation games. The irrigation dilemma captures situations of asymmetric access to common resources while contributions of all participants are needed to maintain the physical infrastructure.In our model analysis we compare various alternative theories, including naïve simple ones like selfish rational actors and altruistic actors. We contrast these with various alternative behavioral models for collective action as well as inclusion of other-regarding preferences. The systematic comparison of alternative models on experimental data from 44 groups enables us to test which behavioral theories best explain the observed effects of communication. We do not find that one theory clearly outperform others in explaining the data.

KW - Agent-based models

KW - Calibration

KW - Common pool resources

KW - Experimental data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027934485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027934485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027934485

VL - 46

SP - 106

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology

SN - 0272-4944

ER -