US weight guidelines: Is it also important to consider cardiorespiratory fitness?

Chong Lee, A. S. Jackson, S. N. Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The health consequences of weight ranges across low to moderate and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the 1995 US weight guidelines, while considering cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS: We followed 21,856 men, aged 30-83 y, who had a complete preventive medical examination, including a maximal treadmill exercise test and body composition assessment. There were 427 deaths (144 cardiovascular disease (CVD); 143 cancer; 140 others) during an average of 8.1 y of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the relations among cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and all-cause and CVD mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, examination year, cigarette smoking and alcohol intake, we observed that men with a BMI of 19.0 to < 25.0 and who were unfit had 2.3 times the risk of all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59-3.17, P < 0.001) compared with fit men in this BMI group (reference category). Unfit men with a BMI of 25.0 to < 27.8 also had a greater risk of all-cause mortality than fit men in the same BMI category. Fit but overweight men (BMI ≤ 27.8) had a similar rate of all-cause mortality as physically fit men of normal weight (BMI 19.0 to < 25.0) and had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than unfit and normal weight men. Fit men of normal weight had the lowest CVD mortality, while unfit and overweight men experienced the highest CVD mortality. Unfit men had substantially higher CVD mortality than fit men in each BMI group. CONCLUSIONS: Unfit men had higher all-cause and CVD mortality than fit men. The health benefits of normal weights appear to be limited to men who have moderate or high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. These data suggest the 1995 US weight guidelines may be misleading unless cardiorespiratory fitness is taken into account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Obesity
Volume22
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Weights and Measures
cardiovascular diseases
Mortality
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Exercise Test
exercise test
smoking (habit)
exercise equipment
Insurance Benefits
Body Composition
body composition
body mass index
confidence interval
Body Mass Index
Smoking
Alcohols
Confidence Intervals
death

Keywords

  • BMI
  • Cardiorespiratory fitness
  • Mortality
  • Obesity
  • Weight standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Endocrinology
  • Food Science
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

US weight guidelines : Is it also important to consider cardiorespiratory fitness? / Lee, Chong; Jackson, A. S.; Blair, S. N.

In: International Journal of Obesity, Vol. 22, No. SUPPL. 2, 1998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d21242d112f14b3daa07087513c5cae2,
title = "US weight guidelines: Is it also important to consider cardiorespiratory fitness?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The health consequences of weight ranges across low to moderate and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the 1995 US weight guidelines, while considering cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS: We followed 21,856 men, aged 30-83 y, who had a complete preventive medical examination, including a maximal treadmill exercise test and body composition assessment. There were 427 deaths (144 cardiovascular disease (CVD); 143 cancer; 140 others) during an average of 8.1 y of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the relations among cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and all-cause and CVD mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, examination year, cigarette smoking and alcohol intake, we observed that men with a BMI of 19.0 to < 25.0 and who were unfit had 2.3 times the risk of all-cause mortality (95{\%} confidence interval (95{\%} CI), 1.59-3.17, P < 0.001) compared with fit men in this BMI group (reference category). Unfit men with a BMI of 25.0 to < 27.8 also had a greater risk of all-cause mortality than fit men in the same BMI category. Fit but overweight men (BMI ≤ 27.8) had a similar rate of all-cause mortality as physically fit men of normal weight (BMI 19.0 to < 25.0) and had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than unfit and normal weight men. Fit men of normal weight had the lowest CVD mortality, while unfit and overweight men experienced the highest CVD mortality. Unfit men had substantially higher CVD mortality than fit men in each BMI group. CONCLUSIONS: Unfit men had higher all-cause and CVD mortality than fit men. The health benefits of normal weights appear to be limited to men who have moderate or high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. These data suggest the 1995 US weight guidelines may be misleading unless cardiorespiratory fitness is taken into account.",
keywords = "BMI, Cardiorespiratory fitness, Mortality, Obesity, Weight standards",
author = "Chong Lee and Jackson, {A. S.} and Blair, {S. N.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
journal = "International Journal of Obesity",
issn = "0307-0565",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - US weight guidelines

T2 - Is it also important to consider cardiorespiratory fitness?

AU - Lee, Chong

AU - Jackson, A. S.

AU - Blair, S. N.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - BACKGROUND: The health consequences of weight ranges across low to moderate and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the 1995 US weight guidelines, while considering cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS: We followed 21,856 men, aged 30-83 y, who had a complete preventive medical examination, including a maximal treadmill exercise test and body composition assessment. There were 427 deaths (144 cardiovascular disease (CVD); 143 cancer; 140 others) during an average of 8.1 y of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the relations among cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and all-cause and CVD mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, examination year, cigarette smoking and alcohol intake, we observed that men with a BMI of 19.0 to < 25.0 and who were unfit had 2.3 times the risk of all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59-3.17, P < 0.001) compared with fit men in this BMI group (reference category). Unfit men with a BMI of 25.0 to < 27.8 also had a greater risk of all-cause mortality than fit men in the same BMI category. Fit but overweight men (BMI ≤ 27.8) had a similar rate of all-cause mortality as physically fit men of normal weight (BMI 19.0 to < 25.0) and had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than unfit and normal weight men. Fit men of normal weight had the lowest CVD mortality, while unfit and overweight men experienced the highest CVD mortality. Unfit men had substantially higher CVD mortality than fit men in each BMI group. CONCLUSIONS: Unfit men had higher all-cause and CVD mortality than fit men. The health benefits of normal weights appear to be limited to men who have moderate or high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. These data suggest the 1995 US weight guidelines may be misleading unless cardiorespiratory fitness is taken into account.

AB - BACKGROUND: The health consequences of weight ranges across low to moderate and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the 1995 US weight guidelines, while considering cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS: We followed 21,856 men, aged 30-83 y, who had a complete preventive medical examination, including a maximal treadmill exercise test and body composition assessment. There were 427 deaths (144 cardiovascular disease (CVD); 143 cancer; 140 others) during an average of 8.1 y of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the relations among cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and all-cause and CVD mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, examination year, cigarette smoking and alcohol intake, we observed that men with a BMI of 19.0 to < 25.0 and who were unfit had 2.3 times the risk of all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59-3.17, P < 0.001) compared with fit men in this BMI group (reference category). Unfit men with a BMI of 25.0 to < 27.8 also had a greater risk of all-cause mortality than fit men in the same BMI category. Fit but overweight men (BMI ≤ 27.8) had a similar rate of all-cause mortality as physically fit men of normal weight (BMI 19.0 to < 25.0) and had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than unfit and normal weight men. Fit men of normal weight had the lowest CVD mortality, while unfit and overweight men experienced the highest CVD mortality. Unfit men had substantially higher CVD mortality than fit men in each BMI group. CONCLUSIONS: Unfit men had higher all-cause and CVD mortality than fit men. The health benefits of normal weights appear to be limited to men who have moderate or high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. These data suggest the 1995 US weight guidelines may be misleading unless cardiorespiratory fitness is taken into account.

KW - BMI

KW - Cardiorespiratory fitness

KW - Mortality

KW - Obesity

KW - Weight standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031662408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031662408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9778090

AN - SCOPUS:0031662408

VL - 22

JO - International Journal of Obesity

JF - International Journal of Obesity

SN - 0307-0565

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -