US national forest policies regarding logging: A case study of citizens and scientists in the Chattahoochee National Forest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores how differences in scientist and citizen mental models regarding logging in a US national forest can lead the two groups to support divergent policies, although they agree about the goals that logging policies should achieve in the forest. A case-study methodology of logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest in the United States is used. The case study is informed by two methods: in-depth interviews and a written questionnaire. The in-depth interviews were conducted with both scientists and citizens to elicit their mental models regarding logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest. Upon completion of the in-depth interviews, respondents were asked to complete a written questionnaire that elicited demographic information, as well as information regarding management goals for the forest. We conclude that scientists and citizens agree about the management goals for the Chattahoochee National Forest, but differences in the mental models of the two groups regarding the scientific effects of logging cause disagreement about the optimal logging policy option required to achieve those goals. The article considers the implications of the case study findings for risk communication and public involvement in environmental decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-120
Number of pages18
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

citizen
interview
risk communication
questionnaire
information management
Group
decision making
cause
methodology
management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{9178a72c4adb48ad80e5be9e0c76c6fb,
title = "US national forest policies regarding logging: A case study of citizens and scientists in the Chattahoochee National Forest",
abstract = "This article explores how differences in scientist and citizen mental models regarding logging in a US national forest can lead the two groups to support divergent policies, although they agree about the goals that logging policies should achieve in the forest. A case-study methodology of logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest in the United States is used. The case study is informed by two methods: in-depth interviews and a written questionnaire. The in-depth interviews were conducted with both scientists and citizens to elicit their mental models regarding logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest. Upon completion of the in-depth interviews, respondents were asked to complete a written questionnaire that elicited demographic information, as well as information regarding management goals for the forest. We conclude that scientists and citizens agree about the management goals for the Chattahoochee National Forest, but differences in the mental models of the two groups regarding the scientific effects of logging cause disagreement about the optimal logging policy option required to achieve those goals. The article considers the implications of the case study findings for risk communication and public involvement in environmental decision-making.",
author = "Elizabeth Corley",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/0144287042000262198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "103--120",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - US national forest policies regarding logging

T2 - A case study of citizens and scientists in the Chattahoochee National Forest

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - This article explores how differences in scientist and citizen mental models regarding logging in a US national forest can lead the two groups to support divergent policies, although they agree about the goals that logging policies should achieve in the forest. A case-study methodology of logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest in the United States is used. The case study is informed by two methods: in-depth interviews and a written questionnaire. The in-depth interviews were conducted with both scientists and citizens to elicit their mental models regarding logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest. Upon completion of the in-depth interviews, respondents were asked to complete a written questionnaire that elicited demographic information, as well as information regarding management goals for the forest. We conclude that scientists and citizens agree about the management goals for the Chattahoochee National Forest, but differences in the mental models of the two groups regarding the scientific effects of logging cause disagreement about the optimal logging policy option required to achieve those goals. The article considers the implications of the case study findings for risk communication and public involvement in environmental decision-making.

AB - This article explores how differences in scientist and citizen mental models regarding logging in a US national forest can lead the two groups to support divergent policies, although they agree about the goals that logging policies should achieve in the forest. A case-study methodology of logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest in the United States is used. The case study is informed by two methods: in-depth interviews and a written questionnaire. The in-depth interviews were conducted with both scientists and citizens to elicit their mental models regarding logging in the Chattahoochee National Forest. Upon completion of the in-depth interviews, respondents were asked to complete a written questionnaire that elicited demographic information, as well as information regarding management goals for the forest. We conclude that scientists and citizens agree about the management goals for the Chattahoochee National Forest, but differences in the mental models of the two groups regarding the scientific effects of logging cause disagreement about the optimal logging policy option required to achieve those goals. The article considers the implications of the case study findings for risk communication and public involvement in environmental decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3543039439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3543039439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0144287042000262198

DO - 10.1080/0144287042000262198

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3543039439

VL - 25

SP - 103

EP - 120

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 2

ER -