Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?

Sara Meerow, Joshua P. Newell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In academic and policy discourse, the concept of urban resilience is proliferating. Social theorists, especially human geographers, have rightfully criticized that the underlying politics of resilience have been ignored and stress the importance of asking “resilience of what, to what, and for whom?” This paper calls for careful consideration of not just resilience for whom and what, but also where, when, and why. A three-phase process is introduced to enable these “five Ws” to be negotiated collectively and to engender critical reflection on the politics of urban resilience as plans, initiatives, and projects are conceived, discussed, and implemented. Deployed through the hypothetical case of green infrastructure in Los Angeles, the paper concludes by illustrating how resilience planning trade-offs and decisions affect outcomes over space and time, often with significant implications for equity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalUrban Geography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 14 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

resilience
politics
equity
infrastructure
planning
discourse
decision
policy
project
plan

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • green infrastructure
  • social-ecological systems
  • Urban resilience
  • urban sustainability
  • vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? / Meerow, Sara; Newell, Joshua P.

In: Urban Geography, 14.07.2016, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ddce798e3fd4a2bb82b972a3012dad7,
title = "Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?",
abstract = "In academic and policy discourse, the concept of urban resilience is proliferating. Social theorists, especially human geographers, have rightfully criticized that the underlying politics of resilience have been ignored and stress the importance of asking “resilience of what, to what, and for whom?” This paper calls for careful consideration of not just resilience for whom and what, but also where, when, and why. A three-phase process is introduced to enable these “five Ws” to be negotiated collectively and to engender critical reflection on the politics of urban resilience as plans, initiatives, and projects are conceived, discussed, and implemented. Deployed through the hypothetical case of green infrastructure in Los Angeles, the paper concludes by illustrating how resilience planning trade-offs and decisions affect outcomes over space and time, often with significant implications for equity.",
keywords = "adaptation, green infrastructure, social-ecological systems, Urban resilience, urban sustainability, vulnerability",
author = "Sara Meerow and Newell, {Joshua P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Urban Geography",
issn = "0272-3638",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?

AU - Meerow, Sara

AU - Newell, Joshua P.

PY - 2016/7/14

Y1 - 2016/7/14

N2 - In academic and policy discourse, the concept of urban resilience is proliferating. Social theorists, especially human geographers, have rightfully criticized that the underlying politics of resilience have been ignored and stress the importance of asking “resilience of what, to what, and for whom?” This paper calls for careful consideration of not just resilience for whom and what, but also where, when, and why. A three-phase process is introduced to enable these “five Ws” to be negotiated collectively and to engender critical reflection on the politics of urban resilience as plans, initiatives, and projects are conceived, discussed, and implemented. Deployed through the hypothetical case of green infrastructure in Los Angeles, the paper concludes by illustrating how resilience planning trade-offs and decisions affect outcomes over space and time, often with significant implications for equity.

AB - In academic and policy discourse, the concept of urban resilience is proliferating. Social theorists, especially human geographers, have rightfully criticized that the underlying politics of resilience have been ignored and stress the importance of asking “resilience of what, to what, and for whom?” This paper calls for careful consideration of not just resilience for whom and what, but also where, when, and why. A three-phase process is introduced to enable these “five Ws” to be negotiated collectively and to engender critical reflection on the politics of urban resilience as plans, initiatives, and projects are conceived, discussed, and implemented. Deployed through the hypothetical case of green infrastructure in Los Angeles, the paper concludes by illustrating how resilience planning trade-offs and decisions affect outcomes over space and time, often with significant implications for equity.

KW - adaptation

KW - green infrastructure

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - Urban resilience

KW - urban sustainability

KW - vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978121142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978121142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395

DO - 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Urban Geography

JF - Urban Geography

SN - 0272-3638

ER -