Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article advances an intersectional perspective in the analysis of racial inequities in special education so that theoretical refinement of this problem will strengthen educational equity research and theory. Racial disproportionality in some disability categories continues to affect a sizable number of students in the United States, with dire long-term consequences for the educational trajectories of these learners. After more than four decades, the problem continues to be debated in research, practice, and policy circles. There is consensus among researchers that the racialization of disability embodies complexities that defy linear explanations. But this debate has overlooked the potential of intersectionality to document complexity and to transcend the individual-structure binary that tends to permeate previous scholarship. Indeed, intersectionality's explicit attention to how the complexity of people's everyday experiences is connected to larger historical processes could offer key insights. I analyze how disproportionality research has addressed the intersections of race and disability (along with other markers of oppression) through a contrapuntal reading of works framed with medical, social, and cultural disability models. I conclude with reflections for future research on racial disparities in special education that is mindful of intersectional complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-347
Number of pages19
JournalDu Bois Review
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

intersectionality
disability
special education
everyday experience
research policy
research practice
oppression
equity
student

Keywords

  • Contrapuntal Analysis
  • Disability
  • Disability Models
  • Intersectionality
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Untangling the racialization of disabilities : An intersectionality critique across disability models. / Artiles, Alfredo.

In: Du Bois Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, 09.2013, p. 329-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0cf9ccdb0a784d3bbf4088cc6bf078eb,
title = "Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models",
abstract = "This article advances an intersectional perspective in the analysis of racial inequities in special education so that theoretical refinement of this problem will strengthen educational equity research and theory. Racial disproportionality in some disability categories continues to affect a sizable number of students in the United States, with dire long-term consequences for the educational trajectories of these learners. After more than four decades, the problem continues to be debated in research, practice, and policy circles. There is consensus among researchers that the racialization of disability embodies complexities that defy linear explanations. But this debate has overlooked the potential of intersectionality to document complexity and to transcend the individual-structure binary that tends to permeate previous scholarship. Indeed, intersectionality's explicit attention to how the complexity of people's everyday experiences is connected to larger historical processes could offer key insights. I analyze how disproportionality research has addressed the intersections of race and disability (along with other markers of oppression) through a contrapuntal reading of works framed with medical, social, and cultural disability models. I conclude with reflections for future research on racial disparities in special education that is mindful of intersectional complexity.",
keywords = "Contrapuntal Analysis, Disability, Disability Models, Intersectionality, Race",
author = "Alfredo Artiles",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S1742058X13000271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "329--347",
journal = "Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race",
issn = "1742-058X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Untangling the racialization of disabilities

T2 - An intersectionality critique across disability models

AU - Artiles, Alfredo

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - This article advances an intersectional perspective in the analysis of racial inequities in special education so that theoretical refinement of this problem will strengthen educational equity research and theory. Racial disproportionality in some disability categories continues to affect a sizable number of students in the United States, with dire long-term consequences for the educational trajectories of these learners. After more than four decades, the problem continues to be debated in research, practice, and policy circles. There is consensus among researchers that the racialization of disability embodies complexities that defy linear explanations. But this debate has overlooked the potential of intersectionality to document complexity and to transcend the individual-structure binary that tends to permeate previous scholarship. Indeed, intersectionality's explicit attention to how the complexity of people's everyday experiences is connected to larger historical processes could offer key insights. I analyze how disproportionality research has addressed the intersections of race and disability (along with other markers of oppression) through a contrapuntal reading of works framed with medical, social, and cultural disability models. I conclude with reflections for future research on racial disparities in special education that is mindful of intersectional complexity.

AB - This article advances an intersectional perspective in the analysis of racial inequities in special education so that theoretical refinement of this problem will strengthen educational equity research and theory. Racial disproportionality in some disability categories continues to affect a sizable number of students in the United States, with dire long-term consequences for the educational trajectories of these learners. After more than four decades, the problem continues to be debated in research, practice, and policy circles. There is consensus among researchers that the racialization of disability embodies complexities that defy linear explanations. But this debate has overlooked the potential of intersectionality to document complexity and to transcend the individual-structure binary that tends to permeate previous scholarship. Indeed, intersectionality's explicit attention to how the complexity of people's everyday experiences is connected to larger historical processes could offer key insights. I analyze how disproportionality research has addressed the intersections of race and disability (along with other markers of oppression) through a contrapuntal reading of works framed with medical, social, and cultural disability models. I conclude with reflections for future research on racial disparities in special education that is mindful of intersectional complexity.

KW - Contrapuntal Analysis

KW - Disability

KW - Disability Models

KW - Intersectionality

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891694938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891694938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1742058X13000271

DO - 10.1017/S1742058X13000271

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84891694938

VL - 10

SP - 329

EP - 347

JO - Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

JF - Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

SN - 1742-058X

IS - 2

ER -