(Un)Tangled: Exploring the Asymmetric Coevolution of New Venture Capital Firms’ Reputation and Status

Timothy G. Pollock, Peggy M. Lee, Kyuho Jin, Kisha Lashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 13 Citations

Abstract

We explore the relationship between status and reputation, examining how its dynamics change over time as these two intangible assets coevolve and how reputation and status are influenced by participation in highly visible events. Using a sample of more than 400 newly founded venture capital (VC) firms, we find that reputation and status positively influence each other but that reputation has a greater effect on status, particularly when firms are older. We also find that the effect of past status on current status weakens as VC firms age, but the relationship between past and current reputation remains consistent with age. Furthermore, our findings show that participating in big hits—blockbuster initial public offerings—has a positive relationship with status when firms are young and a positive relationship with reputation when firms are older, and it helps low-status and low-reputation firms more than it helps high-status and high-reputation firms. This study helps differentiate status and reputation, shows how they coevolve, and provides insight into how new firms build these important intangible assets.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages482-517
Number of pages36
JournalAdministrative Science Quarterly
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 7 2015

Fingerprint

venture capital
reputation
firm
assets
Coevolution
participation

Keywords

  • initial public offerings
  • intangible assets
  • new firms
  • reputation
  • status
  • underpricing
  • venture capital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Public Administration
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

(Un)Tangled : Exploring the Asymmetric Coevolution of New Venture Capital Firms’ Reputation and Status. / Pollock, Timothy G.; Lee, Peggy M.; Jin, Kyuho; Lashley, Kisha.

In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 3, 07.09.2015, p. 482-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aaaec491ffd54bfab2fb377f421b58b8,
title = "(Un)Tangled: Exploring the Asymmetric Coevolution of New Venture Capital Firms’ Reputation and Status",
abstract = "We explore the relationship between status and reputation, examining how its dynamics change over time as these two intangible assets coevolve and how reputation and status are influenced by participation in highly visible events. Using a sample of more than 400 newly founded venture capital (VC) firms, we find that reputation and status positively influence each other but that reputation has a greater effect on status, particularly when firms are older. We also find that the effect of past status on current status weakens as VC firms age, but the relationship between past and current reputation remains consistent with age. Furthermore, our findings show that participating in big hits—blockbuster initial public offerings—has a positive relationship with status when firms are young and a positive relationship with reputation when firms are older, and it helps low-status and low-reputation firms more than it helps high-status and high-reputation firms. This study helps differentiate status and reputation, shows how they coevolve, and provides insight into how new firms build these important intangible assets.",
keywords = "initial public offerings, intangible assets, new firms, reputation, status, underpricing, venture capital",
author = "Pollock, {Timothy G.} and Lee, {Peggy M.} and Kyuho Jin and Kisha Lashley",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0001839215585602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "482--517",
journal = "Administrative Science Quarterly",
issn = "0001-8392",
publisher = "Johnson School at Cornell University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Un)Tangled

T2 - Administrative Science Quarterly

AU - Pollock,Timothy G.

AU - Lee,Peggy M.

AU - Jin,Kyuho

AU - Lashley,Kisha

PY - 2015/9/7

Y1 - 2015/9/7

N2 - We explore the relationship between status and reputation, examining how its dynamics change over time as these two intangible assets coevolve and how reputation and status are influenced by participation in highly visible events. Using a sample of more than 400 newly founded venture capital (VC) firms, we find that reputation and status positively influence each other but that reputation has a greater effect on status, particularly when firms are older. We also find that the effect of past status on current status weakens as VC firms age, but the relationship between past and current reputation remains consistent with age. Furthermore, our findings show that participating in big hits—blockbuster initial public offerings—has a positive relationship with status when firms are young and a positive relationship with reputation when firms are older, and it helps low-status and low-reputation firms more than it helps high-status and high-reputation firms. This study helps differentiate status and reputation, shows how they coevolve, and provides insight into how new firms build these important intangible assets.

AB - We explore the relationship between status and reputation, examining how its dynamics change over time as these two intangible assets coevolve and how reputation and status are influenced by participation in highly visible events. Using a sample of more than 400 newly founded venture capital (VC) firms, we find that reputation and status positively influence each other but that reputation has a greater effect on status, particularly when firms are older. We also find that the effect of past status on current status weakens as VC firms age, but the relationship between past and current reputation remains consistent with age. Furthermore, our findings show that participating in big hits—blockbuster initial public offerings—has a positive relationship with status when firms are young and a positive relationship with reputation when firms are older, and it helps low-status and low-reputation firms more than it helps high-status and high-reputation firms. This study helps differentiate status and reputation, shows how they coevolve, and provides insight into how new firms build these important intangible assets.

KW - initial public offerings

KW - intangible assets

KW - new firms

KW - reputation

KW - status

KW - underpricing

KW - venture capital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938562594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938562594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0001839215585602

DO - 10.1177/0001839215585602

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 482

EP - 517

JO - Administrative Science Quarterly

JF - Administrative Science Quarterly

SN - 0001-8392

IS - 3

ER -