Abstract

Nuclear power plant siting provided the first significant public opportunity to examine nuclear safety and to affect nuclear policy. These discussions were prompted and fueled by perceptions of nuclear risk. Now, as we begin the process of nuclear decommissioning, we are finding that power plant removal - unsiting - is also likely to attract public interest. This paper presents a preliminary survey of how we are likely to react to this emerging theme, applying these findings within a land use context to see if it is likely to produce issues salient to the public. In so doing it also examines how these issues could affect decommissioning timing and type. It suggests that the most likely prospect is that power plants will remain on the landscape long after they are closed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-69
Number of pages13
JournalProfessional Geographer
Volume48
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1996

Fingerprint

nuclear power plant
decommissioning
power plant
land use
nuclear policy
public interest
public

Keywords

  • Decommissioning
  • Derelict
  • Land use
  • Nuclear
  • Risk
  • Siting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Unsiting nuclear power plants : Decommissioning risks and their land use context. / Pasqualetti, Martin; Pijawka, David.

In: Professional Geographer, Vol. 48, No. 1, 02.1996, p. 57-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0acb3b4c1774235a0d959615cfbee83,
title = "Unsiting nuclear power plants: Decommissioning risks and their land use context",
abstract = "Nuclear power plant siting provided the first significant public opportunity to examine nuclear safety and to affect nuclear policy. These discussions were prompted and fueled by perceptions of nuclear risk. Now, as we begin the process of nuclear decommissioning, we are finding that power plant removal - unsiting - is also likely to attract public interest. This paper presents a preliminary survey of how we are likely to react to this emerging theme, applying these findings within a land use context to see if it is likely to produce issues salient to the public. In so doing it also examines how these issues could affect decommissioning timing and type. It suggests that the most likely prospect is that power plants will remain on the landscape long after they are closed.",
keywords = "Decommissioning, Derelict, Land use, Nuclear, Risk, Siting",
author = "Martin Pasqualetti and David Pijawka",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "57--69",
journal = "Professional Geographer",
issn = "0033-0124",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unsiting nuclear power plants

T2 - Decommissioning risks and their land use context

AU - Pasqualetti, Martin

AU - Pijawka, David

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - Nuclear power plant siting provided the first significant public opportunity to examine nuclear safety and to affect nuclear policy. These discussions were prompted and fueled by perceptions of nuclear risk. Now, as we begin the process of nuclear decommissioning, we are finding that power plant removal - unsiting - is also likely to attract public interest. This paper presents a preliminary survey of how we are likely to react to this emerging theme, applying these findings within a land use context to see if it is likely to produce issues salient to the public. In so doing it also examines how these issues could affect decommissioning timing and type. It suggests that the most likely prospect is that power plants will remain on the landscape long after they are closed.

AB - Nuclear power plant siting provided the first significant public opportunity to examine nuclear safety and to affect nuclear policy. These discussions were prompted and fueled by perceptions of nuclear risk. Now, as we begin the process of nuclear decommissioning, we are finding that power plant removal - unsiting - is also likely to attract public interest. This paper presents a preliminary survey of how we are likely to react to this emerging theme, applying these findings within a land use context to see if it is likely to produce issues salient to the public. In so doing it also examines how these issues could affect decommissioning timing and type. It suggests that the most likely prospect is that power plants will remain on the landscape long after they are closed.

KW - Decommissioning

KW - Derelict

KW - Land use

KW - Nuclear

KW - Risk

KW - Siting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029774454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029774454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 57

EP - 69

JO - Professional Geographer

JF - Professional Geographer

SN - 0033-0124

IS - 1

ER -