Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance

Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions

Jacob T N Young, Cesar J. Rebellon, J. C. Barnes, Frank M. Weerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The strong correlation between measures of personal and peer deviance occurs with near "law-like" regularity. Yet, as with other manifestations of peer similarity (often referred to as homophily), the mechanisms generating this relationship are widely debated. Specific to the deviance literature, most studies have failed to examine, simultaneously, the degree to which similarity is the consequence of multiple causes. The current study addresses this gap by using longitudinal network data for 1,151 individuals from the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR) School Project. Structural equation modeling is used to address these issues by adapting Jussim and Osgood's (1989) model of deviant attitudes in dyadic pairs to the current data. Across two separate behavioral domains (substance use and property offending), the results provide strong support for the prediction that individuals project their own deviant tendencies inaccurately onto their peers. Conversely, the results provide little or no support for the predictions that respondents accurately perceive their peers' deviance or that their perceptions of peer deviance influence their own behavior. Implications for understanding the role of peer behavior in the etiology of adolescent deviance are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-86
Number of pages27
JournalCriminology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

deviant behavior
Law Enforcement
Crime
Netherlands
data network
regularity
etiology
law enforcement
offense
adolescent
cause
Law
school
Surveys and Questionnaires
Peer Influence

Keywords

  • Deviant peers
  • Influence
  • Mechanism
  • Social networks
  • Theory testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance : Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. / Young, Jacob T N; Rebellon, Cesar J.; Barnes, J. C.; Weerman, Frank M.

In: Criminology, Vol. 52, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 60-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89a8159850c947c58a26d3719f51bf9b,
title = "Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions",
abstract = "The strong correlation between measures of personal and peer deviance occurs with near {"}law-like{"} regularity. Yet, as with other manifestations of peer similarity (often referred to as homophily), the mechanisms generating this relationship are widely debated. Specific to the deviance literature, most studies have failed to examine, simultaneously, the degree to which similarity is the consequence of multiple causes. The current study addresses this gap by using longitudinal network data for 1,151 individuals from the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR) School Project. Structural equation modeling is used to address these issues by adapting Jussim and Osgood's (1989) model of deviant attitudes in dyadic pairs to the current data. Across two separate behavioral domains (substance use and property offending), the results provide strong support for the prediction that individuals project their own deviant tendencies inaccurately onto their peers. Conversely, the results provide little or no support for the predictions that respondents accurately perceive their peers' deviance or that their perceptions of peer deviance influence their own behavior. Implications for understanding the role of peer behavior in the etiology of adolescent deviance are discussed.",
keywords = "Deviant peers, Influence, Mechanism, Social networks, Theory testing",
author = "Young, {Jacob T N} and Rebellon, {Cesar J.} and Barnes, {J. C.} and Weerman, {Frank M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9125.12029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "60--86",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance

T2 - Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions

AU - Young, Jacob T N

AU - Rebellon, Cesar J.

AU - Barnes, J. C.

AU - Weerman, Frank M.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - The strong correlation between measures of personal and peer deviance occurs with near "law-like" regularity. Yet, as with other manifestations of peer similarity (often referred to as homophily), the mechanisms generating this relationship are widely debated. Specific to the deviance literature, most studies have failed to examine, simultaneously, the degree to which similarity is the consequence of multiple causes. The current study addresses this gap by using longitudinal network data for 1,151 individuals from the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR) School Project. Structural equation modeling is used to address these issues by adapting Jussim and Osgood's (1989) model of deviant attitudes in dyadic pairs to the current data. Across two separate behavioral domains (substance use and property offending), the results provide strong support for the prediction that individuals project their own deviant tendencies inaccurately onto their peers. Conversely, the results provide little or no support for the predictions that respondents accurately perceive their peers' deviance or that their perceptions of peer deviance influence their own behavior. Implications for understanding the role of peer behavior in the etiology of adolescent deviance are discussed.

AB - The strong correlation between measures of personal and peer deviance occurs with near "law-like" regularity. Yet, as with other manifestations of peer similarity (often referred to as homophily), the mechanisms generating this relationship are widely debated. Specific to the deviance literature, most studies have failed to examine, simultaneously, the degree to which similarity is the consequence of multiple causes. The current study addresses this gap by using longitudinal network data for 1,151 individuals from the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR) School Project. Structural equation modeling is used to address these issues by adapting Jussim and Osgood's (1989) model of deviant attitudes in dyadic pairs to the current data. Across two separate behavioral domains (substance use and property offending), the results provide strong support for the prediction that individuals project their own deviant tendencies inaccurately onto their peers. Conversely, the results provide little or no support for the predictions that respondents accurately perceive their peers' deviance or that their perceptions of peer deviance influence their own behavior. Implications for understanding the role of peer behavior in the etiology of adolescent deviance are discussed.

KW - Deviant peers

KW - Influence

KW - Mechanism

KW - Social networks

KW - Theory testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892485200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892485200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9125.12029

DO - 10.1111/1745-9125.12029

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 60

EP - 86

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 1

ER -