Unpacking Territorial Disputes: Domestic Political Influences and War

Thorin Wright, Paul F. Diehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What distinguishes the militarized territorial disputes that escalate to war from those that do not? Although research has clearly established that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone, the understanding as to why this is the case is less developed when compared to domestic factors such as joint democracy. We explain that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone when democratic and autocratic states are engaged in conflict against one another. Because of domestic concerns, democracies and autocracies value territory differently, generating a smaller bargaining space. Democracies will tend to be more resistant to settlement when territory is of a “public,” symbolic, or intangible value. Autocracies, on the other hand, are more likely to value the tangible qualities of territory, such as its resource value. This disparity in territorial goals makes mixed regime dyads more war-prone when territory is disputed. We further believe that the smaller the winning coalition in autocracies, the more war-prone they are against democracies. We test these propositions among all dyads as well as interstate rivals and find support for our theoretical framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-669
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

political influence
democracy
dyad
Values
coalition
Dispute
Political influence
regime
Democracy
resources
Dyads

Keywords

  • militarized disputes
  • rivalry
  • territory
  • war

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Unpacking Territorial Disputes : Domestic Political Influences and War. / Wright, Thorin; Diehl, Paul F.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2014, p. 645-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{670ae39b66c942f29a036463b9af3ec9,
title = "Unpacking Territorial Disputes: Domestic Political Influences and War",
abstract = "What distinguishes the militarized territorial disputes that escalate to war from those that do not? Although research has clearly established that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone, the understanding as to why this is the case is less developed when compared to domestic factors such as joint democracy. We explain that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone when democratic and autocratic states are engaged in conflict against one another. Because of domestic concerns, democracies and autocracies value territory differently, generating a smaller bargaining space. Democracies will tend to be more resistant to settlement when territory is of a “public,” symbolic, or intangible value. Autocracies, on the other hand, are more likely to value the tangible qualities of territory, such as its resource value. This disparity in territorial goals makes mixed regime dyads more war-prone when territory is disputed. We further believe that the smaller the winning coalition in autocracies, the more war-prone they are against democracies. We test these propositions among all dyads as well as interstate rivals and find support for our theoretical framework.",
keywords = "militarized disputes, rivalry, territory, war",
author = "Thorin Wright and Diehl, {Paul F.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0022002714553105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "645--669",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking Territorial Disputes

T2 - Domestic Political Influences and War

AU - Wright, Thorin

AU - Diehl, Paul F.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - What distinguishes the militarized territorial disputes that escalate to war from those that do not? Although research has clearly established that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone, the understanding as to why this is the case is less developed when compared to domestic factors such as joint democracy. We explain that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone when democratic and autocratic states are engaged in conflict against one another. Because of domestic concerns, democracies and autocracies value territory differently, generating a smaller bargaining space. Democracies will tend to be more resistant to settlement when territory is of a “public,” symbolic, or intangible value. Autocracies, on the other hand, are more likely to value the tangible qualities of territory, such as its resource value. This disparity in territorial goals makes mixed regime dyads more war-prone when territory is disputed. We further believe that the smaller the winning coalition in autocracies, the more war-prone they are against democracies. We test these propositions among all dyads as well as interstate rivals and find support for our theoretical framework.

AB - What distinguishes the militarized territorial disputes that escalate to war from those that do not? Although research has clearly established that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone, the understanding as to why this is the case is less developed when compared to domestic factors such as joint democracy. We explain that territorial conflicts are especially war-prone when democratic and autocratic states are engaged in conflict against one another. Because of domestic concerns, democracies and autocracies value territory differently, generating a smaller bargaining space. Democracies will tend to be more resistant to settlement when territory is of a “public,” symbolic, or intangible value. Autocracies, on the other hand, are more likely to value the tangible qualities of territory, such as its resource value. This disparity in territorial goals makes mixed regime dyads more war-prone when territory is disputed. We further believe that the smaller the winning coalition in autocracies, the more war-prone they are against democracies. We test these propositions among all dyads as well as interstate rivals and find support for our theoretical framework.

KW - militarized disputes

KW - rivalry

KW - territory

KW - war

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966714683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966714683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002714553105

DO - 10.1177/0022002714553105

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84966714683

VL - 60

SP - 645

EP - 669

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 4

ER -