University Rankings

Evidence and a Conceptual Framework

Jacob Fowles, H. George Frederickson, Jonathan Koppell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

University ranking has high public visibility, the ranking business has flourished, and institutions of higher education have not been able to ignore it. This study of university ranking presents general considerations of ranking and institutional responses to it, particularly considering reactions to ranking, ranking as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and ranking as a means of transforming qualities into quantities. The authors present a conceptual framework of university ranking based on three propositions and carry out a descriptive statistical analysis of U.S. and international ranking data to evaluate those propositions. The first proposition of university ranking is that ranking systems are demarcated by a high degree of stability, equilibrium, and path dependence. The second proposition links ranking to institutional identity. The third proposition posits that rankings function as a catalyst for institutional isomorphism. The conclusion reviews some important new developments in university ranking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)790-803
Number of pages14
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

university ranking
ranking
evidence
self-fulfilling prophecy
Ranking
Conceptual framework
University rankings
path dependence
statistical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

University Rankings : Evidence and a Conceptual Framework. / Fowles, Jacob; Frederickson, H. George; Koppell, Jonathan.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, 01.09.2016, p. 790-803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fowles, Jacob ; Frederickson, H. George ; Koppell, Jonathan. / University Rankings : Evidence and a Conceptual Framework. In: Public Administration Review. 2016 ; Vol. 76, No. 5. pp. 790-803.
@article{8fcafa6d35ac4f1a931137ebcb61a82e,
title = "University Rankings: Evidence and a Conceptual Framework",
abstract = "University ranking has high public visibility, the ranking business has flourished, and institutions of higher education have not been able to ignore it. This study of university ranking presents general considerations of ranking and institutional responses to it, particularly considering reactions to ranking, ranking as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and ranking as a means of transforming qualities into quantities. The authors present a conceptual framework of university ranking based on three propositions and carry out a descriptive statistical analysis of U.S. and international ranking data to evaluate those propositions. The first proposition of university ranking is that ranking systems are demarcated by a high degree of stability, equilibrium, and path dependence. The second proposition links ranking to institutional identity. The third proposition posits that rankings function as a catalyst for institutional isomorphism. The conclusion reviews some important new developments in university ranking.",
author = "Jacob Fowles and Frederickson, {H. George} and Jonathan Koppell",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/puar.12610",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "790--803",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - University Rankings

T2 - Evidence and a Conceptual Framework

AU - Fowles, Jacob

AU - Frederickson, H. George

AU - Koppell, Jonathan

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - University ranking has high public visibility, the ranking business has flourished, and institutions of higher education have not been able to ignore it. This study of university ranking presents general considerations of ranking and institutional responses to it, particularly considering reactions to ranking, ranking as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and ranking as a means of transforming qualities into quantities. The authors present a conceptual framework of university ranking based on three propositions and carry out a descriptive statistical analysis of U.S. and international ranking data to evaluate those propositions. The first proposition of university ranking is that ranking systems are demarcated by a high degree of stability, equilibrium, and path dependence. The second proposition links ranking to institutional identity. The third proposition posits that rankings function as a catalyst for institutional isomorphism. The conclusion reviews some important new developments in university ranking.

AB - University ranking has high public visibility, the ranking business has flourished, and institutions of higher education have not been able to ignore it. This study of university ranking presents general considerations of ranking and institutional responses to it, particularly considering reactions to ranking, ranking as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and ranking as a means of transforming qualities into quantities. The authors present a conceptual framework of university ranking based on three propositions and carry out a descriptive statistical analysis of U.S. and international ranking data to evaluate those propositions. The first proposition of university ranking is that ranking systems are demarcated by a high degree of stability, equilibrium, and path dependence. The second proposition links ranking to institutional identity. The third proposition posits that rankings function as a catalyst for institutional isomorphism. The conclusion reviews some important new developments in university ranking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982938657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982938657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/puar.12610

DO - 10.1111/puar.12610

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 790

EP - 803

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 5

ER -