University Legitimacy and Student Compliance With Academic Dishonesty Codes

A Partial Test of the Process-Based Model of Self-Regulation

Michael Reisig, Stacy N. Bain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tests whether behavioral intentions to commit two forms of student academic dishonesty (i.e., cheating on exams and plagiarizing a paper) are related to perceived university legitimacy. Cross-sectional data from a university-based sample (N = 502) are used to construct a three-dimensional, second-order confirmatory model of university legitimacy. The results from the ordinal logistic models show that students who perceive university authority as legitimate are less likely to express intentions to cheat on an exam, net of other known correlates of deviance and demographic factors. This finding holds when the Legitimacy Scale is disaggregated. When it comes to plagiarism, the effect of university legitimacy is null. Overall, the findings indicate that the explanatory scope of the process-based model extends rule breaking beyond criminal justice settings and that university authorities can curb student cheating by ensuring that their processes and procedures used to manage students are evenhanded.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-101
Number of pages19
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Illegitimacy
self-regulation
Compliance
legitimacy
Students
university
student
Plagiarism
Criminal Law
deviant behavior
demographic factors
Self-Control
Logistic Models
justice
logistics
Demography

Keywords

  • cheating
  • compliance
  • conduct code
  • legitimacy
  • plagiarism
  • procedural justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Cite this

@article{445ec7aad711416c8114d385f51ad0c4,
title = "University Legitimacy and Student Compliance With Academic Dishonesty Codes: A Partial Test of the Process-Based Model of Self-Regulation",
abstract = "This study tests whether behavioral intentions to commit two forms of student academic dishonesty (i.e., cheating on exams and plagiarizing a paper) are related to perceived university legitimacy. Cross-sectional data from a university-based sample (N = 502) are used to construct a three-dimensional, second-order confirmatory model of university legitimacy. The results from the ordinal logistic models show that students who perceive university authority as legitimate are less likely to express intentions to cheat on an exam, net of other known correlates of deviance and demographic factors. This finding holds when the Legitimacy Scale is disaggregated. When it comes to plagiarism, the effect of university legitimacy is null. Overall, the findings indicate that the explanatory scope of the process-based model extends rule breaking beyond criminal justice settings and that university authorities can curb student cheating by ensuring that their processes and procedures used to manage students are evenhanded.",
keywords = "cheating, compliance, conduct code, legitimacy, plagiarism, procedural justice",
author = "Michael Reisig and Bain, {Stacy N.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093854815611165",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "83--101",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - University Legitimacy and Student Compliance With Academic Dishonesty Codes

T2 - A Partial Test of the Process-Based Model of Self-Regulation

AU - Reisig, Michael

AU - Bain, Stacy N.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This study tests whether behavioral intentions to commit two forms of student academic dishonesty (i.e., cheating on exams and plagiarizing a paper) are related to perceived university legitimacy. Cross-sectional data from a university-based sample (N = 502) are used to construct a three-dimensional, second-order confirmatory model of university legitimacy. The results from the ordinal logistic models show that students who perceive university authority as legitimate are less likely to express intentions to cheat on an exam, net of other known correlates of deviance and demographic factors. This finding holds when the Legitimacy Scale is disaggregated. When it comes to plagiarism, the effect of university legitimacy is null. Overall, the findings indicate that the explanatory scope of the process-based model extends rule breaking beyond criminal justice settings and that university authorities can curb student cheating by ensuring that their processes and procedures used to manage students are evenhanded.

AB - This study tests whether behavioral intentions to commit two forms of student academic dishonesty (i.e., cheating on exams and plagiarizing a paper) are related to perceived university legitimacy. Cross-sectional data from a university-based sample (N = 502) are used to construct a three-dimensional, second-order confirmatory model of university legitimacy. The results from the ordinal logistic models show that students who perceive university authority as legitimate are less likely to express intentions to cheat on an exam, net of other known correlates of deviance and demographic factors. This finding holds when the Legitimacy Scale is disaggregated. When it comes to plagiarism, the effect of university legitimacy is null. Overall, the findings indicate that the explanatory scope of the process-based model extends rule breaking beyond criminal justice settings and that university authorities can curb student cheating by ensuring that their processes and procedures used to manage students are evenhanded.

KW - cheating

KW - compliance

KW - conduct code

KW - legitimacy

KW - plagiarism

KW - procedural justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948446642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948446642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854815611165

DO - 10.1177/0093854815611165

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 83

EP - 101

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 1

ER -