Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering

Results from the project to assess climate in engineering

Elizabeth Litzler, Jacob Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Research on student attrition from engineering has focused on a variety of factors including demographics, campus climate, interactions with faculty and peers, and learning experiences. It remains unclear, however, whether qualitative differences in risk of attrition response patterns exist among students. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS) The following research questions are the basis for this study: (1) What can be learned about the risk of attrition from engineering by grouping students using a novel method and multiple measures? (2) How are individual characteristics, student experiences, and perceptions related to qualitative differences among students in their risk of attrition? DESIGN/METHOD Latent class analysis identifies qualitative differences among engineering students on measures of risk of attrition. A variety of covariates predict membership in each class using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Three latent classes are identified with varying degrees of commitment to degree completion and interest in their engineering major. Individuals who are less confident, experience negative interactions with peers and instructors, and hold negative perceptions of engineering are less likely to be committed to engineering and more likely to be interested in other majors. Student experiences mediate the effects of key individual characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Certain types of student experiences are pivotal for a student's commitment to the major and commitment to degree completion. The risk of attrition is sensitive to a combination of student characteristics, experiences, and perceptions. The mediated relationships between risk of attrition and individual characteristics re-iterate the importance of including student experience variables to control for the context of a college.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-345
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Engineering Education
Volume101
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

climate
Students
engineering
student
experience
commitment
demographic factors
interaction
grouping
Logistics
instructor
logistics
regression
learning

Keywords

  • Persistence
  • Risk of attrition
  • Student experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering : Results from the project to assess climate in engineering. / Litzler, Elizabeth; Young, Jacob.

In: Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 319-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{81a0de4d02084a15851e1c966fcfcd1a,
title = "Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Research on student attrition from engineering has focused on a variety of factors including demographics, campus climate, interactions with faculty and peers, and learning experiences. It remains unclear, however, whether qualitative differences in risk of attrition response patterns exist among students. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS) The following research questions are the basis for this study: (1) What can be learned about the risk of attrition from engineering by grouping students using a novel method and multiple measures? (2) How are individual characteristics, student experiences, and perceptions related to qualitative differences among students in their risk of attrition? DESIGN/METHOD Latent class analysis identifies qualitative differences among engineering students on measures of risk of attrition. A variety of covariates predict membership in each class using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Three latent classes are identified with varying degrees of commitment to degree completion and interest in their engineering major. Individuals who are less confident, experience negative interactions with peers and instructors, and hold negative perceptions of engineering are less likely to be committed to engineering and more likely to be interested in other majors. Student experiences mediate the effects of key individual characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Certain types of student experiences are pivotal for a student's commitment to the major and commitment to degree completion. The risk of attrition is sensitive to a combination of student characteristics, experiences, and perceptions. The mediated relationships between risk of attrition and individual characteristics re-iterate the importance of including student experience variables to control for the context of a college.",
keywords = "Persistence, Risk of attrition, Student experience",
author = "Elizabeth Litzler and Jacob Young",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "319--345",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "1069-4730",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering

T2 - Results from the project to assess climate in engineering

AU - Litzler, Elizabeth

AU - Young, Jacob

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - BACKGROUND Research on student attrition from engineering has focused on a variety of factors including demographics, campus climate, interactions with faculty and peers, and learning experiences. It remains unclear, however, whether qualitative differences in risk of attrition response patterns exist among students. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS) The following research questions are the basis for this study: (1) What can be learned about the risk of attrition from engineering by grouping students using a novel method and multiple measures? (2) How are individual characteristics, student experiences, and perceptions related to qualitative differences among students in their risk of attrition? DESIGN/METHOD Latent class analysis identifies qualitative differences among engineering students on measures of risk of attrition. A variety of covariates predict membership in each class using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Three latent classes are identified with varying degrees of commitment to degree completion and interest in their engineering major. Individuals who are less confident, experience negative interactions with peers and instructors, and hold negative perceptions of engineering are less likely to be committed to engineering and more likely to be interested in other majors. Student experiences mediate the effects of key individual characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Certain types of student experiences are pivotal for a student's commitment to the major and commitment to degree completion. The risk of attrition is sensitive to a combination of student characteristics, experiences, and perceptions. The mediated relationships between risk of attrition and individual characteristics re-iterate the importance of including student experience variables to control for the context of a college.

AB - BACKGROUND Research on student attrition from engineering has focused on a variety of factors including demographics, campus climate, interactions with faculty and peers, and learning experiences. It remains unclear, however, whether qualitative differences in risk of attrition response patterns exist among students. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS) The following research questions are the basis for this study: (1) What can be learned about the risk of attrition from engineering by grouping students using a novel method and multiple measures? (2) How are individual characteristics, student experiences, and perceptions related to qualitative differences among students in their risk of attrition? DESIGN/METHOD Latent class analysis identifies qualitative differences among engineering students on measures of risk of attrition. A variety of covariates predict membership in each class using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Three latent classes are identified with varying degrees of commitment to degree completion and interest in their engineering major. Individuals who are less confident, experience negative interactions with peers and instructors, and hold negative perceptions of engineering are less likely to be committed to engineering and more likely to be interested in other majors. Student experiences mediate the effects of key individual characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Certain types of student experiences are pivotal for a student's commitment to the major and commitment to degree completion. The risk of attrition is sensitive to a combination of student characteristics, experiences, and perceptions. The mediated relationships between risk of attrition and individual characteristics re-iterate the importance of including student experience variables to control for the context of a college.

KW - Persistence

KW - Risk of attrition

KW - Student experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859944535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859944535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 319

EP - 345

JO - Journal of Engineering Education

JF - Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 1069-4730

IS - 2

ER -