Entendiendo la cambiante fuerza de trabajo en la educación superior

Una comparación de las experiencias de facultad con y sin posibilidad de permanencia

Translated title of the contribution: Understanding the changing faculty workforce in higher education: A comparison of full-time non-tenure track and tenure line experiences

Molly Ott, Jesus Cisneros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Non-tenure track faculty are a growing majority in American higher education, but research examining their work lives is limited. Moreover, the theoretical frameworks commonly used by scholars have been critiqued for reliance on ideologically charged assumptions. Using a conceptual model developed from Hackman and Oldham’s (1980) Job Characteristics Model (JCM) and prior research on faculty workplace experiences, this study considers the extent to which full-time non-tenure track and tenure line faculty share a professionalized approach to their jobs, working conditions, and how this is associated with their organizational commitment. Findings demonstrate important consistencies in full-time faculty views of their workplaces and jobs across appointment type. Satisfaction with resources, rewards, autonomy and feedback had a significant positive relationship with odds of organizational commitment for all faculty groups. Overall, the results suggest being removed from the tenure track is not associated with faculty viewing their jobs in a substantially different way than those in tenure line positions, which underscores the importance of conceptualizing full-time faculty work as an integrated whole.

Original languageSpanish
JournalEducation Policy Analysis Archives
Volume23
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 21 2015

Fingerprint

education
experience
workplace
commitment
job characteristics
time
working conditions
reward
autonomy
resources
Group

Keywords

  • Job characteristics
  • Non-tenure track faculty
  • Organizational commitment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{2e66b5aa31534a42ba2c82531fccbdd6,
title = "Entendiendo la cambiante fuerza de trabajo en la educaci{\'o}n superior: Una comparaci{\'o}n de las experiencias de facultad con y sin posibilidad de permanencia",
abstract = "Non-tenure track faculty are a growing majority in American higher education, but research examining their work lives is limited. Moreover, the theoretical frameworks commonly used by scholars have been critiqued for reliance on ideologically charged assumptions. Using a conceptual model developed from Hackman and Oldham’s (1980) Job Characteristics Model (JCM) and prior research on faculty workplace experiences, this study considers the extent to which full-time non-tenure track and tenure line faculty share a professionalized approach to their jobs, working conditions, and how this is associated with their organizational commitment. Findings demonstrate important consistencies in full-time faculty views of their workplaces and jobs across appointment type. Satisfaction with resources, rewards, autonomy and feedback had a significant positive relationship with odds of organizational commitment for all faculty groups. Overall, the results suggest being removed from the tenure track is not associated with faculty viewing their jobs in a substantially different way than those in tenure line positions, which underscores the importance of conceptualizing full-time faculty work as an integrated whole.",
keywords = "Job characteristics, Non-tenure track faculty, Organizational commitment",
author = "Molly Ott and Jesus Cisneros",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "21",
doi = "10.14507/epaa.v23.1934",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "23",
journal = "Education Policy Analysis Archives",
issn = "1068-2341",
publisher = "Arizona State University",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entendiendo la cambiante fuerza de trabajo en la educación superior

T2 - Una comparación de las experiencias de facultad con y sin posibilidad de permanencia

AU - Ott, Molly

AU - Cisneros, Jesus

PY - 2015/9/21

Y1 - 2015/9/21

N2 - Non-tenure track faculty are a growing majority in American higher education, but research examining their work lives is limited. Moreover, the theoretical frameworks commonly used by scholars have been critiqued for reliance on ideologically charged assumptions. Using a conceptual model developed from Hackman and Oldham’s (1980) Job Characteristics Model (JCM) and prior research on faculty workplace experiences, this study considers the extent to which full-time non-tenure track and tenure line faculty share a professionalized approach to their jobs, working conditions, and how this is associated with their organizational commitment. Findings demonstrate important consistencies in full-time faculty views of their workplaces and jobs across appointment type. Satisfaction with resources, rewards, autonomy and feedback had a significant positive relationship with odds of organizational commitment for all faculty groups. Overall, the results suggest being removed from the tenure track is not associated with faculty viewing their jobs in a substantially different way than those in tenure line positions, which underscores the importance of conceptualizing full-time faculty work as an integrated whole.

AB - Non-tenure track faculty are a growing majority in American higher education, but research examining their work lives is limited. Moreover, the theoretical frameworks commonly used by scholars have been critiqued for reliance on ideologically charged assumptions. Using a conceptual model developed from Hackman and Oldham’s (1980) Job Characteristics Model (JCM) and prior research on faculty workplace experiences, this study considers the extent to which full-time non-tenure track and tenure line faculty share a professionalized approach to their jobs, working conditions, and how this is associated with their organizational commitment. Findings demonstrate important consistencies in full-time faculty views of their workplaces and jobs across appointment type. Satisfaction with resources, rewards, autonomy and feedback had a significant positive relationship with odds of organizational commitment for all faculty groups. Overall, the results suggest being removed from the tenure track is not associated with faculty viewing their jobs in a substantially different way than those in tenure line positions, which underscores the importance of conceptualizing full-time faculty work as an integrated whole.

KW - Job characteristics

KW - Non-tenure track faculty

KW - Organizational commitment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941985242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941985242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14507/epaa.v23.1934

DO - 10.14507/epaa.v23.1934

M3 - Article

VL - 23

JO - Education Policy Analysis Archives

JF - Education Policy Analysis Archives

SN - 1068-2341

ER -