@article{078c5f31af4444f2b802fe6774ecd9c1,
title = "Understanding research engagement practices among engineering education stakeholders to promote the impact of research on practice",
abstract = "To improve the impact engineering education research has on practice, there is a need to understand how stakeholders (i.e. researchers, practitioners, administrators) currently engage with research. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the ways that various engineering education stakeholders engage with research and their perceptions of the impact of doing so. Twenty-seven engineering stakeholders located in the United States participated in 30–60 min semi-structured interviews. The interview participants{\textquoteright} responses were analysed using thematic analysis. This analysis resulted in two types of findings–namely seven ways engineering education stakeholders tend to engage with research; and four forms of influence that research has on engineering education practice. Both sets of findings were combined to create the Research Engagement Matrix, which maps characterisations of research activities along a continuum from consumer to producers and scopes of influence along a continuum from local to national level. Although the findings of this study are limited to insights from stakeholders in the United States, many of engagement activities and forms of influence may also describe members of the global engineering education community. This work has implications for bridging connections between research and practice among all engineering education stakeholders.",
keywords = "Impact, bridging research and practice, research engagement",
author = "E. Altamirano and London, {J. S.} and K. Lau and N. Waree and S. Cruz",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [1564509];National Science Foundation [1564629]. Funding Information: This project is supported by National Science Foundation Grants #1564629, 1564509. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Funding Information: Recruiting engineering education practitioners for this study required a mix of sampling strategies. One of the goals of the interviews is to include engineering education practitioners who may not typically attend engineering education conferences. Thus, principal investigators (PIs) on active awards supported by the National Science Foundation{\textquoteright}s Directorate for Engineering (ENG) were invited to participate via email. More specifically, recruitment emails were sent to PIs on projects funded by the following ENG divisions: Civil, Mechanical, and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI), Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transportation Systems (CBET), and Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems (EECS). We used this strategy to recruit specific groups. For example, Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (DIA2, http://www.dia2.org) is a web-based visual analytics platform that allows users to search, visualise, and analyse the NSF{\textquoteright}s portfolio of past and current research awards (Madhavan et al. 2014, 2012). We used DIA2 to identify and target PIs on awards related to engineering student advising and academic support programmes (e.g. WEP, MEP) to increase the likelihood of engaging Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, {\textcopyright} 2019 Engineers Australia.",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/22054952.2018.1556770",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "106--116",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "1324-5821",
publisher = "Engineers Australia",
number = "2",
}