Understanding Regime Change: Public Opinion, Legitimacy, and Legal Consciousness

Scott Barclay, Susan S. Silbey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By their willingness to revise existing constitutional definitions, courts help political institutions pursue popular policies. The idea of court-assisted regime change resonated within political science because it appeared consistent with contemporary policy controversies. In cases such as desegregation and interracial marriage, the Supreme Court of the United States appeared to be creating openings for state and local, as well as federal, agencies to incorporate popular demands for change. The requirement necessary for constitutional courts to accomplish regime change was clear: a population sufficiently aware of the role of a constitutional court to permit such a court to review and legitimate changes in rules required for new policies. This article argues that contemporary research on legal consciousness offers a means to explain the role of courts in facilitating and legitimating regime changes that keep government policy consonant, to variable degrees, with transformations in material conditions and popular sentiment. It discusses the mechanism of change and the mechanism of legitimation and presents a classic account of the role of the Supreme Court in American politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191576980
ISBN (Print)9780199208425
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 14 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

legal consciousness
public opinion
legitimacy
regime
constitutional court
Supreme Court
legitimation
political institution
political science
government policy
segregation
marriage
politics

Keywords

  • Courts
  • Legal consciousness
  • Legitimation
  • Political science
  • Politics
  • Regime change
  • Supreme court
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Understanding Regime Change : Public Opinion, Legitimacy, and Legal Consciousness. / Barclay, Scott; Silbey, Susan S.

The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2008.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Barclay, Scott ; Silbey, Susan S. / Understanding Regime Change : Public Opinion, Legitimacy, and Legal Consciousness. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2008.
@inbook{d846253b8cea42e28bda0a442f97ce16,
title = "Understanding Regime Change: Public Opinion, Legitimacy, and Legal Consciousness",
abstract = "By their willingness to revise existing constitutional definitions, courts help political institutions pursue popular policies. The idea of court-assisted regime change resonated within political science because it appeared consistent with contemporary policy controversies. In cases such as desegregation and interracial marriage, the Supreme Court of the United States appeared to be creating openings for state and local, as well as federal, agencies to incorporate popular demands for change. The requirement necessary for constitutional courts to accomplish regime change was clear: a population sufficiently aware of the role of a constitutional court to permit such a court to review and legitimate changes in rules required for new policies. This article argues that contemporary research on legal consciousness offers a means to explain the role of courts in facilitating and legitimating regime changes that keep government policy consonant, to variable degrees, with transformations in material conditions and popular sentiment. It discusses the mechanism of change and the mechanism of legitimation and presents a classic account of the role of the Supreme Court in American politics.",
keywords = "Courts, Legal consciousness, Legitimation, Political science, Politics, Regime change, Supreme court, United States",
author = "Scott Barclay and Silbey, {Susan S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0038",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199208425",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Understanding Regime Change

T2 - Public Opinion, Legitimacy, and Legal Consciousness

AU - Barclay, Scott

AU - Silbey, Susan S.

PY - 2008/8/14

Y1 - 2008/8/14

N2 - By their willingness to revise existing constitutional definitions, courts help political institutions pursue popular policies. The idea of court-assisted regime change resonated within political science because it appeared consistent with contemporary policy controversies. In cases such as desegregation and interracial marriage, the Supreme Court of the United States appeared to be creating openings for state and local, as well as federal, agencies to incorporate popular demands for change. The requirement necessary for constitutional courts to accomplish regime change was clear: a population sufficiently aware of the role of a constitutional court to permit such a court to review and legitimate changes in rules required for new policies. This article argues that contemporary research on legal consciousness offers a means to explain the role of courts in facilitating and legitimating regime changes that keep government policy consonant, to variable degrees, with transformations in material conditions and popular sentiment. It discusses the mechanism of change and the mechanism of legitimation and presents a classic account of the role of the Supreme Court in American politics.

AB - By their willingness to revise existing constitutional definitions, courts help political institutions pursue popular policies. The idea of court-assisted regime change resonated within political science because it appeared consistent with contemporary policy controversies. In cases such as desegregation and interracial marriage, the Supreme Court of the United States appeared to be creating openings for state and local, as well as federal, agencies to incorporate popular demands for change. The requirement necessary for constitutional courts to accomplish regime change was clear: a population sufficiently aware of the role of a constitutional court to permit such a court to review and legitimate changes in rules required for new policies. This article argues that contemporary research on legal consciousness offers a means to explain the role of courts in facilitating and legitimating regime changes that keep government policy consonant, to variable degrees, with transformations in material conditions and popular sentiment. It discusses the mechanism of change and the mechanism of legitimation and presents a classic account of the role of the Supreme Court in American politics.

KW - Courts

KW - Legal consciousness

KW - Legitimation

KW - Political science

KW - Politics

KW - Regime change

KW - Supreme court

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923610089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923610089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0038

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0038

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923610089

SN - 9780199208425

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -