Abstract

Anticipatory governance is 'a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible'. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration - as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This article reviews the early history of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the United States, and it further explicates anticipatory governance through exploring the genealogy of the term and addressing a set of critiques found in the literature. These critiques involve skepticism of three proximities of anticipatory governance: to its object, nanotechnology, which is a relatively indistinct one; to the public, which remains almost utterly naïve toward nanotechnology; and to technoscience itself, which allegedly renders anticipatory governance complicit in its hubris. The article concludes that the changing venues and the amplification within them of the still, small voices of folks previously excluded from offering constructive visions of futures afforded by anticipatory governance may not be complete solutions to our woes in governing technology, but they certainly can contribute to bending the long arc of technoscience more toward humane ends.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-242
Number of pages25
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

governance
nanotechnology
genealogy
engineer
new technology
Governance
history
management
knowledge
Nanotechnology
Technoscience

Keywords

  • anticipatory governance
  • emerging technologies
  • foresight
  • nanotechnology
  • public engagement
  • responsible innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. / Guston, David.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 44, No. 2, 04.2014, p. 218-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b5c8f7bd9623497899d8bba2f3b5ec0c,
title = "Understanding 'anticipatory governance'",
abstract = "Anticipatory governance is 'a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible'. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration - as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This article reviews the early history of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the United States, and it further explicates anticipatory governance through exploring the genealogy of the term and addressing a set of critiques found in the literature. These critiques involve skepticism of three proximities of anticipatory governance: to its object, nanotechnology, which is a relatively indistinct one; to the public, which remains almost utterly na{\"i}ve toward nanotechnology; and to technoscience itself, which allegedly renders anticipatory governance complicit in its hubris. The article concludes that the changing venues and the amplification within them of the still, small voices of folks previously excluded from offering constructive visions of futures afforded by anticipatory governance may not be complete solutions to our woes in governing technology, but they certainly can contribute to bending the long arc of technoscience more toward humane ends.",
keywords = "anticipatory governance, emerging technologies, foresight, nanotechnology, public engagement, responsible innovation",
author = "David Guston",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0306312713508669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "218--242",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding 'anticipatory governance'

AU - Guston, David

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Anticipatory governance is 'a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible'. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration - as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This article reviews the early history of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the United States, and it further explicates anticipatory governance through exploring the genealogy of the term and addressing a set of critiques found in the literature. These critiques involve skepticism of three proximities of anticipatory governance: to its object, nanotechnology, which is a relatively indistinct one; to the public, which remains almost utterly naïve toward nanotechnology; and to technoscience itself, which allegedly renders anticipatory governance complicit in its hubris. The article concludes that the changing venues and the amplification within them of the still, small voices of folks previously excluded from offering constructive visions of futures afforded by anticipatory governance may not be complete solutions to our woes in governing technology, but they certainly can contribute to bending the long arc of technoscience more toward humane ends.

AB - Anticipatory governance is 'a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible'. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration - as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This article reviews the early history of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the United States, and it further explicates anticipatory governance through exploring the genealogy of the term and addressing a set of critiques found in the literature. These critiques involve skepticism of three proximities of anticipatory governance: to its object, nanotechnology, which is a relatively indistinct one; to the public, which remains almost utterly naïve toward nanotechnology; and to technoscience itself, which allegedly renders anticipatory governance complicit in its hubris. The article concludes that the changing venues and the amplification within them of the still, small voices of folks previously excluded from offering constructive visions of futures afforded by anticipatory governance may not be complete solutions to our woes in governing technology, but they certainly can contribute to bending the long arc of technoscience more toward humane ends.

KW - anticipatory governance

KW - emerging technologies

KW - foresight

KW - nanotechnology

KW - public engagement

KW - responsible innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896805158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896805158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312713508669

DO - 10.1177/0306312713508669

M3 - Article

C2 - 24941612

AN - SCOPUS:84896805158

VL - 44

SP - 218

EP - 242

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 2

ER -