Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving

Nathan J. McNeill, Elliot P. Douglas, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, David J. Therriault, Ilana Krause

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Problem solving is considered to be a central activity of engineering practice. While some studies have shown how various beliefs affect students' abilities to solve problems, studies are needed that explicitly examine the beliefs and assumptions students bring to the problem-solving process. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe students' engineering problem-solving processes and develop a conceptual model that illustrates students' beliefs about problem solving. Our research question was, What beliefs do students have about engineering problem solving?. Design/Method: We analyzed data from retrospective semistructured interviews carried out after a problem-solving session. We interviewed nine engineering students about the processes they used to solve the problems and the assumptions and beliefs that guided their problem solving. We then used grounded theory to identify and analyze statements from the interviews and to develop a conceptual model of student beliefs. Results: The resulting model has five major categories: the problem-solving process itself, the role of classroom problems, the role of workplace problems, personal characteristics that affect problem solving, and resources that assist problem solving. Students identify a sharp distinction between classroom problems and workplace problems. Conclusions: Our conceptual model provides an initial framework for understanding how students' beliefs affect their approaches to engineering problems. In contrast to stage models, our model shows that students' epistemic beliefs about problem solving are contextual. Future work is needed to understand the limits and extend the applicability of our model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)560-584
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Engineering Education
Volume105
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Students
engineering
student
workplace
classroom
interview
grounded theory
qualitative research
ability
resources

Keywords

  • beliefs
  • grounded theory
  • problem solving
  • qualitative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving. / McNeill, Nathan J.; Douglas, Elliot P.; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Therriault, David J.; Krause, Ilana.

In: Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 105, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 560-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McNeill, Nathan J. ; Douglas, Elliot P. ; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka ; Therriault, David J. ; Krause, Ilana. / Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving. In: Journal of Engineering Education. 2016 ; Vol. 105, No. 4. pp. 560-584.
@article{998ed55d7679481da688623a557b0631,
title = "Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving",
abstract = "Background: Problem solving is considered to be a central activity of engineering practice. While some studies have shown how various beliefs affect students' abilities to solve problems, studies are needed that explicitly examine the beliefs and assumptions students bring to the problem-solving process. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe students' engineering problem-solving processes and develop a conceptual model that illustrates students' beliefs about problem solving. Our research question was, What beliefs do students have about engineering problem solving?. Design/Method: We analyzed data from retrospective semistructured interviews carried out after a problem-solving session. We interviewed nine engineering students about the processes they used to solve the problems and the assumptions and beliefs that guided their problem solving. We then used grounded theory to identify and analyze statements from the interviews and to develop a conceptual model of student beliefs. Results: The resulting model has five major categories: the problem-solving process itself, the role of classroom problems, the role of workplace problems, personal characteristics that affect problem solving, and resources that assist problem solving. Students identify a sharp distinction between classroom problems and workplace problems. Conclusions: Our conceptual model provides an initial framework for understanding how students' beliefs affect their approaches to engineering problems. In contrast to stage models, our model shows that students' epistemic beliefs about problem solving are contextual. Future work is needed to understand the limits and extend the applicability of our model.",
keywords = "beliefs, grounded theory, problem solving, qualitative",
author = "McNeill, {Nathan J.} and Douglas, {Elliot P.} and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Therriault, {David J.} and Ilana Krause",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jee.20150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "560--584",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "1069-4730",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving

AU - McNeill, Nathan J.

AU - Douglas, Elliot P.

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Therriault, David J.

AU - Krause, Ilana

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Background: Problem solving is considered to be a central activity of engineering practice. While some studies have shown how various beliefs affect students' abilities to solve problems, studies are needed that explicitly examine the beliefs and assumptions students bring to the problem-solving process. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe students' engineering problem-solving processes and develop a conceptual model that illustrates students' beliefs about problem solving. Our research question was, What beliefs do students have about engineering problem solving?. Design/Method: We analyzed data from retrospective semistructured interviews carried out after a problem-solving session. We interviewed nine engineering students about the processes they used to solve the problems and the assumptions and beliefs that guided their problem solving. We then used grounded theory to identify and analyze statements from the interviews and to develop a conceptual model of student beliefs. Results: The resulting model has five major categories: the problem-solving process itself, the role of classroom problems, the role of workplace problems, personal characteristics that affect problem solving, and resources that assist problem solving. Students identify a sharp distinction between classroom problems and workplace problems. Conclusions: Our conceptual model provides an initial framework for understanding how students' beliefs affect their approaches to engineering problems. In contrast to stage models, our model shows that students' epistemic beliefs about problem solving are contextual. Future work is needed to understand the limits and extend the applicability of our model.

AB - Background: Problem solving is considered to be a central activity of engineering practice. While some studies have shown how various beliefs affect students' abilities to solve problems, studies are needed that explicitly examine the beliefs and assumptions students bring to the problem-solving process. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe students' engineering problem-solving processes and develop a conceptual model that illustrates students' beliefs about problem solving. Our research question was, What beliefs do students have about engineering problem solving?. Design/Method: We analyzed data from retrospective semistructured interviews carried out after a problem-solving session. We interviewed nine engineering students about the processes they used to solve the problems and the assumptions and beliefs that guided their problem solving. We then used grounded theory to identify and analyze statements from the interviews and to develop a conceptual model of student beliefs. Results: The resulting model has five major categories: the problem-solving process itself, the role of classroom problems, the role of workplace problems, personal characteristics that affect problem solving, and resources that assist problem solving. Students identify a sharp distinction between classroom problems and workplace problems. Conclusions: Our conceptual model provides an initial framework for understanding how students' beliefs affect their approaches to engineering problems. In contrast to stage models, our model shows that students' epistemic beliefs about problem solving are contextual. Future work is needed to understand the limits and extend the applicability of our model.

KW - beliefs

KW - grounded theory

KW - problem solving

KW - qualitative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992344925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992344925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jee.20150

DO - 10.1002/jee.20150

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 560

EP - 584

JO - Journal of Engineering Education

JF - Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 1069-4730

IS - 4

ER -