Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery

Ian W. Eisenberg, Patrick G. Bissett, A. Zeynep Enkavi, Jamie Li, David Mackinnon, Lisa A. Marsch, Russell A. Poldrack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychological sciences have identified a wealth of cognitive processes and behavioral phenomena, yet struggle to produce cumulative knowledge. Progress is hamstrung by siloed scientific traditions and a focus on explanation over prediction, two issues that are particularly damaging for the study of multifaceted constructs like self-regulation. Here, we derive a psychological ontology from a study of individual differences across a broad range of behavioral tasks, self-report surveys, and self-reported real-world outcomes associated with self-regulation. Though both tasks and surveys putatively measure self-regulation, they show little empirical relationship. Within tasks and surveys, however, the ontology identifies reliable individual traits and reveals opportunities for theoretic synthesis. We then evaluate predictive power of the psychological measurements and find that while surveys modestly and heterogeneously predict real-world outcomes, tasks largely do not. We conclude that self-regulation lacks coherence as a construct, and that data-driven ontologies lay the groundwork for a cumulative psychological science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2319
JournalNature communications
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ontology
Psychology
Individuality
Self Report
Self-Control
Surveys and Questionnaires
synthesis
predictions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Zeynep Enkavi, A., Li, J., Mackinnon, D., Marsch, L. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. Nature communications, 10(1), [2319]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1

Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. / Eisenberg, Ian W.; Bissett, Patrick G.; Zeynep Enkavi, A.; Li, Jamie; Mackinnon, David; Marsch, Lisa A.; Poldrack, Russell A.

In: Nature communications, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2319, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eisenberg, IW, Bissett, PG, Zeynep Enkavi, A, Li, J, Mackinnon, D, Marsch, LA & Poldrack, RA 2019, 'Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery', Nature communications, vol. 10, no. 1, 2319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1
Eisenberg, Ian W. ; Bissett, Patrick G. ; Zeynep Enkavi, A. ; Li, Jamie ; Mackinnon, David ; Marsch, Lisa A. ; Poldrack, Russell A. / Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. In: Nature communications. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 1.
@article{f687eb482078478a8bef1a750c52401c,
title = "Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery",
abstract = "Psychological sciences have identified a wealth of cognitive processes and behavioral phenomena, yet struggle to produce cumulative knowledge. Progress is hamstrung by siloed scientific traditions and a focus on explanation over prediction, two issues that are particularly damaging for the study of multifaceted constructs like self-regulation. Here, we derive a psychological ontology from a study of individual differences across a broad range of behavioral tasks, self-report surveys, and self-reported real-world outcomes associated with self-regulation. Though both tasks and surveys putatively measure self-regulation, they show little empirical relationship. Within tasks and surveys, however, the ontology identifies reliable individual traits and reveals opportunities for theoretic synthesis. We then evaluate predictive power of the psychological measurements and find that while surveys modestly and heterogeneously predict real-world outcomes, tasks largely do not. We conclude that self-regulation lacks coherence as a construct, and that data-driven ontologies lay the groundwork for a cumulative psychological science.",
author = "Eisenberg, {Ian W.} and Bissett, {Patrick G.} and {Zeynep Enkavi}, A. and Jamie Li and David Mackinnon and Marsch, {Lisa A.} and Poldrack, {Russell A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "Nature Communications",
issn = "2041-1723",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery

AU - Eisenberg, Ian W.

AU - Bissett, Patrick G.

AU - Zeynep Enkavi, A.

AU - Li, Jamie

AU - Mackinnon, David

AU - Marsch, Lisa A.

AU - Poldrack, Russell A.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Psychological sciences have identified a wealth of cognitive processes and behavioral phenomena, yet struggle to produce cumulative knowledge. Progress is hamstrung by siloed scientific traditions and a focus on explanation over prediction, two issues that are particularly damaging for the study of multifaceted constructs like self-regulation. Here, we derive a psychological ontology from a study of individual differences across a broad range of behavioral tasks, self-report surveys, and self-reported real-world outcomes associated with self-regulation. Though both tasks and surveys putatively measure self-regulation, they show little empirical relationship. Within tasks and surveys, however, the ontology identifies reliable individual traits and reveals opportunities for theoretic synthesis. We then evaluate predictive power of the psychological measurements and find that while surveys modestly and heterogeneously predict real-world outcomes, tasks largely do not. We conclude that self-regulation lacks coherence as a construct, and that data-driven ontologies lay the groundwork for a cumulative psychological science.

AB - Psychological sciences have identified a wealth of cognitive processes and behavioral phenomena, yet struggle to produce cumulative knowledge. Progress is hamstrung by siloed scientific traditions and a focus on explanation over prediction, two issues that are particularly damaging for the study of multifaceted constructs like self-regulation. Here, we derive a psychological ontology from a study of individual differences across a broad range of behavioral tasks, self-report surveys, and self-reported real-world outcomes associated with self-regulation. Though both tasks and surveys putatively measure self-regulation, they show little empirical relationship. Within tasks and surveys, however, the ontology identifies reliable individual traits and reveals opportunities for theoretic synthesis. We then evaluate predictive power of the psychological measurements and find that while surveys modestly and heterogeneously predict real-world outcomes, tasks largely do not. We conclude that self-regulation lacks coherence as a construct, and that data-driven ontologies lay the groundwork for a cumulative psychological science.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066929199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066929199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1

DO - 10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

SN - 2041-1723

IS - 1

M1 - 2319

ER -