Abstract

The crystal structure of a metal plays an important role in its relationship to its macroscopic properties as well as atomic mechanisms of structural change. As such, students need to have an ability to visualize planar crystal atomic packing features, but often find it difficult. Thus, the research question here is, 'How can a student's baseline knowledge and misconceptions of planar atomic packing features for different metal structures be measured and how well can instruction promote conceptual change and misconception repair.' Answering this question will provide insight for developing more effective pedagogy for crystal structures. A multiple-choice survey with six items was developed using misconceptions from students' pencil and paper sketches of face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) atoms on (100), (110), and (111) planes. Pretests and posttests of the survey were administered to students in a Spring 2012 introductory materials engineering course. Misconceptions that were revealed included: missing atoms, extra atoms, misplaced atoms, 'non-touching atoms where they should touch' and 'touching atoms that should not touch'. Students' difficulty in solving increased from (100) to (110) to (111) planes for both BCC and FCC structures. Details of the survey instrument and results are described in the paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012 - Seattle, WA, United States
Duration: Oct 3 2012Oct 6 2012

Other

Other42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012
CountryUnited States
CitySeattle, WA
Period10/3/1210/6/12

Fingerprint

Crystal structure
engineering
Atoms
Students
student
structural change
Metals
instruction
Repair
ability
Crystals

Keywords

  • assessment
  • conceptual change
  • crystal structure
  • misconceptions
  • visualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Software
  • Education

Cite this

Uncovering and repairing crystal structure misconceptions in an introductory materials engineering class. / Krause, Stephen; Waters, Cindy.

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. 2012. 6462296.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Krause, S & Waters, C 2012, Uncovering and repairing crystal structure misconceptions in an introductory materials engineering class. in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE., 6462296, 42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012, Seattle, WA, United States, 10/3/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462296
Krause, Stephen ; Waters, Cindy. / Uncovering and repairing crystal structure misconceptions in an introductory materials engineering class. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. 2012.
@inproceedings{3e36eb89609447e28ef6e5eecedd7706,
title = "Uncovering and repairing crystal structure misconceptions in an introductory materials engineering class",
abstract = "The crystal structure of a metal plays an important role in its relationship to its macroscopic properties as well as atomic mechanisms of structural change. As such, students need to have an ability to visualize planar crystal atomic packing features, but often find it difficult. Thus, the research question here is, 'How can a student's baseline knowledge and misconceptions of planar atomic packing features for different metal structures be measured and how well can instruction promote conceptual change and misconception repair.' Answering this question will provide insight for developing more effective pedagogy for crystal structures. A multiple-choice survey with six items was developed using misconceptions from students' pencil and paper sketches of face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) atoms on (100), (110), and (111) planes. Pretests and posttests of the survey were administered to students in a Spring 2012 introductory materials engineering course. Misconceptions that were revealed included: missing atoms, extra atoms, misplaced atoms, 'non-touching atoms where they should touch' and 'touching atoms that should not touch'. Students' difficulty in solving increased from (100) to (110) to (111) planes for both BCC and FCC structures. Details of the survey instrument and results are described in the paper.",
keywords = "assessment, conceptual change, crystal structure, misconceptions, visualization",
author = "Stephen Krause and Cindy Waters",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/FIE.2012.6462296",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781467313513",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Uncovering and repairing crystal structure misconceptions in an introductory materials engineering class

AU - Krause, Stephen

AU - Waters, Cindy

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The crystal structure of a metal plays an important role in its relationship to its macroscopic properties as well as atomic mechanisms of structural change. As such, students need to have an ability to visualize planar crystal atomic packing features, but often find it difficult. Thus, the research question here is, 'How can a student's baseline knowledge and misconceptions of planar atomic packing features for different metal structures be measured and how well can instruction promote conceptual change and misconception repair.' Answering this question will provide insight for developing more effective pedagogy for crystal structures. A multiple-choice survey with six items was developed using misconceptions from students' pencil and paper sketches of face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) atoms on (100), (110), and (111) planes. Pretests and posttests of the survey were administered to students in a Spring 2012 introductory materials engineering course. Misconceptions that were revealed included: missing atoms, extra atoms, misplaced atoms, 'non-touching atoms where they should touch' and 'touching atoms that should not touch'. Students' difficulty in solving increased from (100) to (110) to (111) planes for both BCC and FCC structures. Details of the survey instrument and results are described in the paper.

AB - The crystal structure of a metal plays an important role in its relationship to its macroscopic properties as well as atomic mechanisms of structural change. As such, students need to have an ability to visualize planar crystal atomic packing features, but often find it difficult. Thus, the research question here is, 'How can a student's baseline knowledge and misconceptions of planar atomic packing features for different metal structures be measured and how well can instruction promote conceptual change and misconception repair.' Answering this question will provide insight for developing more effective pedagogy for crystal structures. A multiple-choice survey with six items was developed using misconceptions from students' pencil and paper sketches of face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) atoms on (100), (110), and (111) planes. Pretests and posttests of the survey were administered to students in a Spring 2012 introductory materials engineering course. Misconceptions that were revealed included: missing atoms, extra atoms, misplaced atoms, 'non-touching atoms where they should touch' and 'touching atoms that should not touch'. Students' difficulty in solving increased from (100) to (110) to (111) planes for both BCC and FCC structures. Details of the survey instrument and results are described in the paper.

KW - assessment

KW - conceptual change

KW - crystal structure

KW - misconceptions

KW - visualization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874741086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874741086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462296

DO - 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462296

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84874741086

SN - 9781467313513

BT - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

ER -