Uncertainty reduction in multi-evaluator decision making

Mounir El Asmar, Wafik Boulos Lotfallah, Wei Yin Loh, Awad S. Hanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When selecting construction design-build teams, subjective multi-evaluator decision making can be controversial and can lead to project delay, loss of public trust, and increased legal fees. This paper introduces a mathematical algorithm that supports multi-evaluator selection decisions by detecting and reducing the effect of possible uncertainty in the scores given by the evaluators. The algorithm was coded and tested using several scenarios. The study results show that the model is robust and capable of extracting the maximum knowledge from the scores given by evaluators with varying degrees of expertise. Simulation results show that the proposed model performed better than the simple averaging method 89% of the time. The outcome of this research provides the decision maker with a justified basis to proceed with the selection decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-112
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision making
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Design/build
  • Mathematical models
  • Uncertainty principles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Uncertainty reduction in multi-evaluator decision making. / El Asmar, Mounir; Lotfallah, Wafik Boulos; Loh, Wei Yin; Hanna, Awad S.

In: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

El Asmar, Mounir ; Lotfallah, Wafik Boulos ; Loh, Wei Yin ; Hanna, Awad S. / Uncertainty reduction in multi-evaluator decision making. In: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 105-112.
@article{b2571394e17e4a6ab0ae3f94c1918e59,
title = "Uncertainty reduction in multi-evaluator decision making",
abstract = "When selecting construction design-build teams, subjective multi-evaluator decision making can be controversial and can lead to project delay, loss of public trust, and increased legal fees. This paper introduces a mathematical algorithm that supports multi-evaluator selection decisions by detecting and reducing the effect of possible uncertainty in the scores given by the evaluators. The algorithm was coded and tested using several scenarios. The study results show that the model is robust and capable of extracting the maximum knowledge from the scores given by evaluators with varying degrees of expertise. Simulation results show that the proposed model performed better than the simple averaging method 89{\%} of the time. The outcome of this research provides the decision maker with a justified basis to proceed with the selection decision.",
keywords = "Decision making, Design/build, Mathematical models, Uncertainty principles",
author = "{El Asmar}, Mounir and Lotfallah, {Wafik Boulos} and Loh, {Wei Yin} and Hanna, {Awad S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "105--112",
journal = "Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering",
issn = "0887-3801",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty reduction in multi-evaluator decision making

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

AU - Lotfallah, Wafik Boulos

AU - Loh, Wei Yin

AU - Hanna, Awad S.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - When selecting construction design-build teams, subjective multi-evaluator decision making can be controversial and can lead to project delay, loss of public trust, and increased legal fees. This paper introduces a mathematical algorithm that supports multi-evaluator selection decisions by detecting and reducing the effect of possible uncertainty in the scores given by the evaluators. The algorithm was coded and tested using several scenarios. The study results show that the model is robust and capable of extracting the maximum knowledge from the scores given by evaluators with varying degrees of expertise. Simulation results show that the proposed model performed better than the simple averaging method 89% of the time. The outcome of this research provides the decision maker with a justified basis to proceed with the selection decision.

AB - When selecting construction design-build teams, subjective multi-evaluator decision making can be controversial and can lead to project delay, loss of public trust, and increased legal fees. This paper introduces a mathematical algorithm that supports multi-evaluator selection decisions by detecting and reducing the effect of possible uncertainty in the scores given by the evaluators. The algorithm was coded and tested using several scenarios. The study results show that the model is robust and capable of extracting the maximum knowledge from the scores given by evaluators with varying degrees of expertise. Simulation results show that the proposed model performed better than the simple averaging method 89% of the time. The outcome of this research provides the decision maker with a justified basis to proceed with the selection decision.

KW - Decision making

KW - Design/build

KW - Mathematical models

KW - Uncertainty principles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860176829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860176829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000119

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000119

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

JF - Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

SN - 0887-3801

IS - 1

ER -